Skip to content

Member

Bert-Jan RUISSEN

ECR · Netherlands

Group
ECR
Country
Netherlands
Roll-call participation
99.8 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
80.5 %ⓘ of 615 votes where the group had a line · ECR median 87.7 %
More facts (5)
National party
SGP Staatkundig Gereformeerde Partij
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
71 of 511 votesⓘ
Committees
AGRI, CONT (substitute), PECH
Member id
197773
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

99.8 %

619 of 620 final votes while in office

ECR median: 91.9 % (+7.9 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

80.5 %

495 of 615 votes where their group had a line

ECR median: 87.7 % (−7.2 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

13.9 %

71 of 511 votes where their group had a clear line

30 opposite (for ↔ against), 27 abstained against the line, 14 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

13.9 %

86 of 619 votes cast

Participation 99.8 % — ECR median 91.9 %, 79 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 79 members of the ECR with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Bert-Jan RUISSEN99.8 %
ECR median91.9 %
Lowest in the group51.0 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members79
With majority line 80.5 % — ECR median 87.7 %, 79 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 79 members of the ECR with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Bert-Jan RUISSEN80.5 %
ECR median87.7 %
Lowest in the group46.1 %
Highest in the group94.6 %
Members79
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of ECR; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 41, adding text after paragraph 37 119 for, 484 against, 26 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 37 — part 2 469 for, 130 against, 22 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 40 to paragraph 36 279 for, 305 against, 43 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 39 to paragraph 35 123 for, 476 against, 2 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 34 — part 2 449 for, 163 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 33 — part 6 428 for, 151 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 33 — part 5 443 for, 153 against, 23 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 33 — part 4 451 for, 165 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Separate vote on paragraph 32 483 for, 106 against, 32 abstainedPosition: Against ≠ groupMajority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 31 — part 2 440 for, 157 against, 24 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 30 — part 2 452 for, 86 against, 81 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 30 — part 1 565 for, 46 against, 15 abstainedPosition: Against ≠ groupMajority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 38, adding text after paragraph 29 107 for, 488 against, 24 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 37, adding text after paragraph 29 105 for, 501 against, 20 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 36, adding text after paragraph 29 120 for, 459 against, 40 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 35, adding text after paragraph 29 102 for, 497 against, 18 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 29 108 for, 484 against, 32 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 29 — part 3 498 for, 97 against, 22 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 29 — part 2 506 for, 88 against, 27 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 29 — part 1 558 for, 47 against, 18 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 33 to paragraph 29 127 for, 487 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 80, adding text after paragraph 28 153 for, 432 against, 27 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 28 137 for, 478 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Separate vote on paragraph 28 449 for, 129 against, 40 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 32 to paragraph 28 91 for, 506 against, 23 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 27 106 for, 486 against, 27 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 27 135 for, 479 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 26 114 for, 482 against, 21 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 75, adding text after paragraph 25 139 for, 448 against, 36 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 31, adding text after paragraph 24 98 for, 513 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 23 — part 3 444 for, 164 against, 18 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 23 — part 1 558 for, 40 against, 22 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 30 to paragraph 23 120 for, 472 against, 26 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 29, adding text after paragraph 22 77 for, 523 against, 24 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 22 — part 6 441 for, 166 against, 17 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 22 — part 4 461 for, 127 against, 33 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 22 — part 2 489 for, 122 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 28 to paragraph 22 121 for, 476 against, 24 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 21 — part 4 487 for, 125 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 21 — part 2 493 for, 114 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 21 — part 1 499 for, 105 against, 19 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 59 to paragraph 21 — part 2 189 for, 400 against, 23 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 59 to paragraph 21 — part 1 189 for, 405 against, 28 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 74, adding text after paragraph 20 103 for, 488 against, 28 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 73, adding text after paragraph 20 119 for, 485 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 72, adding text after paragraph 20 111 for, 494 against, 18 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 71, adding text after paragraph 20 117 for, 498 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 20 118 for, 492 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 58, adding text after paragraph 20 — part 2 193 for, 404 against, 24 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 58, adding text after paragraph 20 — part 1 199 for, 402 against, 20 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 0 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within ECR

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Ivaylo VALCHEV ECRBulgaria84 % of 5 765 shared81 %
Stephen Nikola BARTULICA ECRCroatia84 % of 4 960 shared81 %
Aurelijus VERYGA ECRLithuania84 % of 5 361 shared81 %
Diego SOLIER changed group ECRSpain83 % of 5 281 shared81 %
Nora JUNCO GARCÍA changed group ECRSpain83 % of 5 083 shared81 %
Adam BIELAN ECRPoland82 % of 5 468 shared81 %
Waldemar TOMASZEWSKI ECRLithuania82 % of 4 186 shared81 %
Mario MANTOVANI ECRItaly82 % of 4 214 shared81 %
Mariusz KAMIŃSKI ECRPoland82 % of 5 808 shared81 %
Beata SZYDŁO ECRPoland82 % of 5 523 shared81 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Tiago MOREIRA DE SÁ PatriotsPortugal70 % of 5 634 shared68 %
Juan Carlos GIRAUTA VIDAL PatriotsSpain70 % of 5 242 shared68 %
Jorge BUXADÉ VILLALBA PatriotsSpain70 % of 5 603 shared68 %
Mireia BORRÁS PABÓN PatriotsSpain70 % of 5 508 shared68 %
Margarita DE LA PISA CARRIÓN PatriotsSpain69 % of 5 862 shared68 %
Sander SMIT changed group ECRNetherlands69 % of 3 596 shared50 %
Branko GRIMS changed group No groupSlovenia69 % of 5 418 shared50 %
Hermann TERTSCH PatriotsSpain69 % of 4 425 shared68 %
Ondřej KOVAŘÍK Former memberPatriotsCzechia69 % of 1 183 shared68 %
Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group ECRNetherlands69 % of 3 978 shared50 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Agriculture and Rural DevelopmentAGRI CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Budgetary ControlCONT CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Committee on FisheriesPECH CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Subcommittee on Human RightsDROI SubcommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Delegation for relations with IsraelD-IL DelegationVice-chair4 Feb 2025now
Delegation to the EU-Armenia Parliamentary Partnership Committee, the EU-Azerbaijan Parliamentary Cooperation Committee and the EU-Georgia Parliamentary Association CommitteeDSCA DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Intergroup on Biodiversity, Hunting and CountrysideIG10-04 Intergroup / working groupMember4 Feb 2025now
Intergroup on Freedom of Religion, Belief and ConscienceIG10-13 Intergroup / working groupChair co27 Jan 2025now
Delegation for relations with IsraelD-IL DelegationMember19 Sept 20243 Feb 2025

Show all 9 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
Discharge 2025: General budget of the EU - European ParliamentShadow rapporteurCONT28 Sept 2026
General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2027 - all sectionsShadow rapporteur for an opinionPECH14 Jul 2026
Establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034Shadow rapporteur for an opinionPECH4 May 2026
Establishing a budget expenditure tracking and performance framework and other horizontal rules for the Union programmes and activitiesShadow rapporteurCONT2 Feb 2026
Establishing Global EuropeShadow rapporteur for an opinionCONT2 Feb 2026
Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2024Shadow rapporteurCONT26 Jan 2026
Establishing Horizon Europe, the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation, for the period 2028-2034 laying down its rules for participation and dissemination, and repealing Regulation (EU) 2021/695Opinion rapporteurAGRI13 Jan 2026
Establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034Shadow rapporteurAGRI13 Jan 2026
Establishing a budget expenditure tracking and performance framework and other horizontal rules for the Union programmes and activitiesShadow rapporteurCONT13 Jan 2026
Establishing Global EuropeShadow rapporteur for an opinionCONT13 Jan 2026

Show all 33 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

90 contributions recorded; 25 on behalf of their group; 115 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
16 Sept 2026Stop gold-plating, relieve SMEs: Member States must implement EU legislation without adding extra bureaucracy (topical debate) on behalf of ECRSpeech · 1 minRead
9 Jul 2026Evaluation of the common fisheries policy and follow-up (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
9 Jul 2026Evaluation of the common fisheries policy and follow-up (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
8 Jul 2026The abduction, forced conversion and child marriage of Maria Shahbaz and the protection of girls in Pakistan Speech · 1 minRead
8 Jul 2026Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre Speech · 1 minRead
8 Jul 2026The EU’s role in the reconstruction of the Gaza Strip and the accountability of Israel under international law (topical debate) Speech · 1 minRead
17 Jun 2026Preparation of the European Council (joint debate) Speech · 1 minRead
19 May 2026Presentation of the Fertilisers Action Plan (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
18 May 2026The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basins (debate) on behalf of ECRSpeech · 1 minRead
30 Apr 2026How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers’ resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases? (debate) Speech · 1 minRead

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 100

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
14 Sept 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Deteriorating situation of media freedom and freedom of expression in Hong-Kong, amid the recent arrest of bookseller Leticia Wong and the convictions of Lee Cheuk-yan and Chow Hang-tung B-10-2026-0407Motion for a resolutionwith 23 co-authors—
9 Sept 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up B-10-2026-0386Motion for a resolutionwith 6 co-authors—
1 Sept 2026Dutch penalties for the unintended EU ban on catching poultry by the legs E-10-2026-003421Written questionNot yet answered
1 Sept 2026Dutch trade measures concerning goods originating from the West Bank P-10-2026-003417Priority written questionNot yet answered
17 Jul 2026Solidarity between Member States during periods of low water levels E-10-2026-003052Written question25 Aug 2026
11 Jul 2026Belgian road tax disc and compensation P-10-2026-002867Priority written question31 Aug 2026
8 Jul 2026Expert sub-group on eel E-10-2026-002829Written questionwith 1 co-author24 Aug 2026
6 Jul 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre B-10-2026-0356Motion for a resolutionwith 29 co-authors—
6 Jul 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the abduction, forced conversion and child marriage of Maria Shahbaz and the protection of girls in Pakistan B-10-2026-0351Motion for a resolutionwith 26 co-authors—
1 Jul 2026Engine damage caused by biofuel in inland shipping E-10-2026-002738Written questionNot yet answered

Show all 100 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 106

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
17 Jul 2026Strengthening competitiveness, resilience and fairness in EU agriculture AGRI-AM-791100 AGRI27
17 Jul 2026on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790898 AGRI2
16 Jul 2026General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2027 - all sections PECH-AM-791014 PECH10
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790954 AGRI7
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790919 AGRI1
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790918 AGRI8
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790917 AGRI8
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790916 AGRI6
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790915 AGRI2
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790899 AGRI3

Show all 106 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
1 October 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Bert-Jan RUISSEN”. Member record. memberId 197773. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197773?page=40&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 1 October 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197773. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/197773?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-197773,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Bert-Jan RUISSEN}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197773?page=40&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197773?page=40&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-10-01},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 197773. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197773. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}