Skip to content

Member

Ioan-Rareş BOGDAN

EPP · Romania

Group
EPP PPE
Country
Romania
Roll-call participation
81.3 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
97.6 %ⓘ of 504 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 95.6 %
More facts (5)
National party
PNL Partidul Naţional Liberal
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
5 of 478 votesⓘ
Committees
AFET (vice-chair), CULT (substitute), ENVI, LIBE, PETI (substitute)
Member id
197636
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

81.3 %

504 of 620 final votes while in office

EPP median: 90.6 % (−9.3 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

97.6 %

492 of 504 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 95.6 % (+2.1 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

1.0 %

5 of 478 votes where their group had a clear line

3 opposite (for ↔ against), 2 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

0.4 %

2 of 504 votes cast

Participation 81.3 % — EPP median 90.6 %, 192 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 192 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Ioan-Rareş BOGDAN81.3 %
EPP median90.6 %
Lowest in the group18.4 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members192
With majority line 97.6 % — EPP median 95.6 %, 192 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 192 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Ioan-Rareş BOGDAN97.6 %
EPP median95.6 %
Lowest in the group67.8 %
Highest in the group99.0 %
Members192
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
30 Apr 2026Shortcomings and deficiencies of the ‘Amnesty Law’ in Venezuela Amendment 2 to paragraph 5 157 for, 329 against, 69 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
30 Apr 2026Shortcomings and deficiencies of the ‘Amnesty Law’ in Venezuela Amendment 8 to paragraph 4 83 for, 465 against, 24 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
30 Apr 2026Shortcomings and deficiencies of the ‘Amnesty Law’ in Venezuela Amendment 6 to paragraph 2 49 for, 504 against, 20 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
30 Apr 2026New Chinese law on ‘ethnic unity and progress’ and the intensified suppression of ethnic identities Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 439 for, 52 against, 71 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
30 Apr 2026New Chinese law on ‘ethnic unity and progress’ and the intensified suppression of ethnic identities Amendment 1 to paragraph 4 104 for, 377 against, 86 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
30 Apr 2026Escalating trafficking and exploitation by criminal groups in Haiti Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 511 for, 21 against, 42 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
30 Apr 2026Escalating trafficking and exploitation by criminal groups in Haiti Amendment 4, adding text after recital B 86 for, 415 against, 66 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
30 Apr 2026Escalating trafficking and exploitation by criminal groups in Haiti Paragraph 6 — part 2 370 for, 180 against, 19 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
30 Apr 2026Escalating trafficking and exploitation by criminal groups in Haiti Amendment 3 to paragraph 6 99 for, 427 against, 40 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
30 Apr 2026Escalating trafficking and exploitation by criminal groups in Haiti Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 5 84 for, 464 against, 11 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026Genetically modified soybean MON 94637 Final vote on the motion for a resolutionObjection passed 412 for, 145 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 416 for, 190 against, 15 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
29 Apr 2026Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 Amendment 6, adding text after recital D 187 for, 419 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 48 195 for, 419 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 Amendment 29, adding text after paragraph 36 202 for, 423 against, 1 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 Amendment 28, adding text after paragraph 36 205 for, 403 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 Amendment 14 to paragraph 36 202 for, 424 against, 1 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 31 193 for, 421 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 22 195 for, 420 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 Amendment 24 to paragraph 19 189 for, 425 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 17 197 for, 421 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 Amendment 22 to paragraph 17 198 for, 417 against, 1 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 12 193 for, 428 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 6 212 for, 406 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 Paragraph 2 — part 2 407 for, 190 against, 25 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 387 for, 191 against, 46 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 14 to recital R 220 for, 399 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 12 to paragraph 185 185 for, 426 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 11 to paragraph 168 201 for, 419 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 155 282 for, 334 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 10 to paragraph 126 192 for, 418 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 20, adding text after paragraph 118 197 for, 416 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Separate vote on paragraph 117 336 for, 261 against, 29 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 9 to paragraph 116 188 for, 422 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 113 218 for, 401 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Paragraph 112 — part 3 284 for, 335 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Paragraph 112 — part 2 408 for, 192 against, 22 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Paragraph 112 — part 1 498 for, 80 against, 57 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 7 to paragraph 112 207 for, 410 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 6 to paragraph 103 205 for, 419 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Separate vote on paragraph 102 291 for, 240 against, 74 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Abstained
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Separate vote on paragraph 101 365 for, 168 against, 78 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Separate vote on paragraph 100 357 for, 203 against, 45 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: For
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 5 to paragraph 91 207 for, 406 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 86 200 for, 411 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 3 to paragraph 77 196 for, 422 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 65 194 for, 417 against, 15 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 17 to paragraph 55 200 for, 419 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 16 to paragraph 44 181 for, 419 against, 22 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
29 Apr 2026The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report Amendment 15 to paragraph 38 206 for, 408 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 18 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Manfred WEBER EPPGermany97 % of 4 023 shared89 %
Virgil-Daniel POPESCU EPPRomania96 % of 4 500 shared89 %
Pekka TOVERI EPPFinland96 % of 4 477 shared89 %
Daniel BUDA EPPRomania96 % of 4 879 shared89 %
Mircea-Gheorghe HAVA EPPRomania96 % of 3 994 shared89 %
Sven SIMON EPPGermany96 % of 4 040 shared89 %
Siegfried MUREŞAN EPPRomania96 % of 4 859 shared89 %
Rasa JUKNEVIČIENĖ EPPLithuania95 % of 4 276 shared89 %
Gheorghe FALCĂ EPPRomania95 % of 4 449 shared89 %
Mika AALTOLA EPPFinland95 % of 4 271 shared89 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Urmas PAET RenewEstonia87 % of 4 683 shared82 %
Eugen TOMAC RenewRomania87 % of 3 689 shared82 %
Dan BARNA RenewRomania87 % of 4 436 shared82 %
Hilde VAUTMANS RenewBelgium86 % of 4 818 shared82 %
Ivars IJABS RenewLatvia86 % of 3 908 shared82 %
Jérémy DECERLE RenewFrance86 % of 2 405 shared82 %
Olivier CHASTEL RenewBelgium86 % of 4 694 shared82 %
Katri KULMUNI RenewFinland85 % of 3 964 shared82 %
Elsi KATAINEN RenewFinland85 % of 4 886 shared82 %
Moritz KÖRNER RenewGermany85 % of 4 886 shared82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Foreign AffairsAFET CommitteeVice-chair23 Jul 2024now
Committee on Culture and EducationCULT CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Committee on the Environment, Climate and Food SafetyENVI CommitteeMember27 Apr 2026now
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on PetitionsPETI CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldEUDS Special committeeMember23 Jan 2025now
Delegation for relations with BelarusD-BY DelegationMember19 Sept 2024now
Delegation for relations with IsraelD-IL DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation for relations with Iraq, including the EU-Iraq Parliamentary Cooperation CommitteeD-IQ DelegationChair16 Oct 2024now
Delegation to the EU-Moldova Parliamentary Association CommitteeD-MD DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now

Show all 15 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
No dossier namedOfficial delegationEUDS29 Apr 2025
No dossier namedDelegation chairD-IQ30 Sept 2024
No dossier namedCommittee vice-chairAFET22 Jul 2024

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

22 contributions recorded, 7 written statements; 25 minutes of speaking time.

Show all 22 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 63

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
9 Sept 2026Public procurement reform: Higher bills for councils and backroom negotiations? E-10-2026-003593Written questionNot yet answered
9 Sept 2026Why is Brussels funding projects in the North Pole, when Romania has the available graphite and infrastructure? E-10-2026-003584Written questionNot yet answered
13 Aug 2026Impact of AI on reading and interest in books in Europe E-10-2026-003275Written questionNot yet answered
11 Aug 2026Shortcomings in the application of the Digital Services Act in cases where disinformation goes viral pose a risk to citizens’ safety E-10-2026-003251Written questionNot yet answered
24 Jul 2026Risks of new electrification targets on infrastructure and citizens E-10-2026-003117Written questionNot yet answered
15 Jul 2026German Ambassador to Moldova offends Romanians P-10-2026-002929Priority written question10 Aug 2026
3 Jul 2026Mandatory ceilings for data centre water consumption and impact of AI infrastructure E-10-2026-002764Written question26 Aug 2026
3 Jul 2026Safeguards for operational neutrality and protection of Romania’s strategic economic interests E-10-2026-002763Written questionNot yet answered
3 Jul 2026Will the Commission’s new omnibus proposals simplify rules for Romanian businesses or saddle them with hidden costs? E-10-2026-002762Written question21 Sept 2026
16 Jun 2026Impact of the ban on exports of sheep from Romania E-10-2026-002482Written question21 Aug 2026

Show all 63 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 65

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
12 Jun 2026Establishing the Erasmus+ programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/817 and (EU) 2021/878988 CULT-AM-789899 CULT6
12 Jun 2026Establishing the Erasmus+ programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/817 and (EU) 2021/878988 CULT-AM-789968 CULT1
12 Jun 2026Establishing the Erasmus+ programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/817 and (EU) 2021/878988 CULT-AM-789967 CULT1
5 Jun 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788898 ITRE5
19 May 2026Guidelines for trans-European energy infrastructure, amending Regulations (EU) 2019/942, (EU) 2019/943 and (EU) 2024/1789 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2022/869 ITRE-AM-788939 ITRE37
19 May 2026Guidelines for trans-European energy infrastructure, amending Regulations (EU) 2019/942, (EU) 2019/943 and (EU) 2024/1789 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2022/869 ITRE-AM-788924 ITRE28
19 May 2026Establishing the Temporary Decarbonisation Fund ENVI-AM-788820 ENVI2
19 May 2026Guidelines for trans-European energy infrastructure, amending Regulations (EU) 2019/942, (EU) 2019/943 and (EU) 2024/1789 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2022/869 ITRE-AM-788941 ITRE16
19 May 2026Guidelines for trans-European energy infrastructure, amending Regulations (EU) 2019/942, (EU) 2019/943 and (EU) 2024/1789 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2022/869 ITRE-AM-788940 ITRE45
19 May 2026Guidelines for trans-European energy infrastructure, amending Regulations (EU) 2019/942, (EU) 2019/943 and (EU) 2024/1789 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2022/869 ITRE-AM-788922 ITRE36

Show all 65 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Romania National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
30 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Ioan-Rareş BOGDAN”. Member record. memberId 197636. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197636?page=24&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 30 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197636. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/197636?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-197636,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Ioan-Rareş BOGDAN}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197636?page=24&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197636?page=24&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-30},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 197636. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197636. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}