Member

Patryk JAKI

ECR · Poland

Group: ECR
Country: Poland
Roll-call participation: 95.6 %ⓘ of 2 891 roll calls in office · chamber median 91.2 % · 2025, roll calls
With majority line: 91.0 %ⓘ of 2 756 votes where the group had a line · ECR median 91.5 %

More facts (5)

National party: PiS Prawo i Sprawiedliwość
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 90 of 2 418 votesⓘ
Committees: AFCO
Member id: 197516

National party: PiS Prawo i Sprawiedliwość
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 90 of 2 418 votesⓘ
Committees: AFCO
Member id: 197516

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes293 All roll calls2 891

Roll-call participation ⓘ

95.6 %

2 764 of 2 891 roll calls while in office

ECR median: 92.1 % (+3.5 pts)

Chamber median: 91.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

91.0 %

2 507 of 2 756 votes where their group had a line

ECR median: 91.5 % (−0.5 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

3.7 %

90 of 2 418 votes where their group had a clear line

43 opposite (for ↔ against), 36 abstained against the line, 11 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

7.7 %

214 of 2 764 votes cast

Participation 95.6 % — ECR median 92.1 %, 79 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 79 members of the ECR with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Patryk JAKI	95.6 %
ECR median	92.1 %
Lowest in the group	46.1 %
Highest in the group	99.7 %
Members	79

With majority line 91.0 % — ECR median 91.5 %, 79 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 79 members of the ECR with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Patryk JAKI	91.0 %
ECR median	91.5 %
Lowest in the group	67.6 %
Highest in the group	94.4 %
Members	79

2025, 2 891 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of ECR; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H	181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3	381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2	338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1	524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E	84 for, 484 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D	193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C	204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C	215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C	209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C	95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B	345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A	459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5	439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1	392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Abstained
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15	448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2	297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1	304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14	92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13	330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2	351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13	195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12	390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Abstained
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4	441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3	427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12	231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11	208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11	235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10	277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3	353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2	363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1	390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9	203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9	266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8	215 for, 335 against, 54 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8	261 for, 316 against, 27 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7	395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7	177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7	204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7	202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7	253 for, 329 against, 22 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 6 of 51 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
20 Jan 2025	2	2
21 Jan 2025	1	1
22 Jan 2025	2	2
23 Jan 2025	45	45
10 Feb 2025	1	1
11 Feb 2025	32	31
12 Feb 2025	10	10
13 Feb 2025	30	30
10 Mar 2025	2	0
11 Mar 2025	9	9
12 Mar 2025	228	224
13 Mar 2025	24	21
31 Mar 2025	3	3
1 Apr 2025	35	35
2 Apr 2025	251	247
3 Apr 2025	62	52
5 May 2025	5	0
6 May 2025	10	9
7 May 2025	220	208
8 May 2025	103	101
21 May 2025	2	2
22 May 2025	53	51
16 Jun 2025	2	0
17 Jun 2025	41	38
18 Jun 2025	91	90
19 Jun 2025	87	83
7 Jul 2025	1	1
8 Jul 2025	55	55
9 Jul 2025	134	129
10 Jul 2025	36	32
8 Sept 2025	1	1
9 Sept 2025	101	98
10 Sept 2025	34	33
11 Sept 2025	69	67
6 Oct 2025	2	0
7 Oct 2025	5	5
8 Oct 2025	55	49
9 Oct 2025	65	61
20 Oct 2025	3	3
21 Oct 2025	13	13
22 Oct 2025	186	173
23 Oct 2025	55	54
13 Nov 2025	267	265
24 Nov 2025	3	0
25 Nov 2025	75	73
26 Nov 2025	100	95
27 Nov 2025	125	115
15 Dec 2025	4	0
16 Dec 2025	66	66
17 Dec 2025	43	39
18 Dec 2025	42	42

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within ECR

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Małgorzata GOSIEWSKA	Małgorzata GOSIEWSKA	ECR	Poland	97 % of 5 103 shared	81 %
Select Kosma ZŁOTOWSKI	Kosma ZŁOTOWSKI	ECR	Poland	97 % of 5 388 shared	81 %
Select Piotr MÜLLER	Piotr MÜLLER	ECR	Poland	97 % of 4 642 shared	81 %
Select Marlena MALĄG	Marlena MALĄG	ECR	Poland	97 % of 5 312 shared	81 %
Select Anna ZALEWSKA	Anna ZALEWSKA	ECR	Poland	96 % of 5 373 shared	81 %
Select Bogdan RZOŃCA	Bogdan RZOŃCA	ECR	Poland	96 % of 5 399 shared	81 %
Select Beata SZYDŁO	Beata SZYDŁO	ECR	Poland	96 % of 5 098 shared	81 %
Select Daniel OBAJTEK	Daniel OBAJTEK	ECR	Poland	96 % of 4 478 shared	81 %
Select Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA	Jadwiga WIŚNIEWSKA	ECR	Poland	96 % of 5 263 shared	81 %
Select Dominik TARCZYŃSKI	Dominik TARCZYŃSKI	ECR	Poland	96 % of 3 556 shared	81 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Juan Carlos GIRAUTA VIDAL	Juan Carlos GIRAUTA VIDAL	Patriots	Spain	75 % of 4 824 shared	68 %
Select Tiago MOREIRA DE SÁ	Tiago MOREIRA DE SÁ	Patriots	Portugal	75 % of 5 198 shared	68 %
Select Jorge BUXADÉ VILLALBA	Jorge BUXADÉ VILLALBA	Patriots	Spain	74 % of 5 157 shared	68 %
Select Mireia BORRÁS PABÓN	Mireia BORRÁS PABÓN	Patriots	Spain	74 % of 5 070 shared	68 %
Select Margarita DE LA PISA CARRIÓN	Margarita DE LA PISA CARRIÓN	Patriots	Spain	74 % of 5 399 shared	68 %
Select Ondřej KOVAŘÍK	Ondřej KOVAŘÍK Former member	Patriots	Czechia	74 % of 1 138 shared	68 %
Select Hermann TERTSCH	Hermann TERTSCH	Patriots	Spain	74 % of 4 075 shared	68 %
Select Anna BRYŁKA	Anna BRYŁKA changed group	Patriots	Poland	73 % of 4 882 shared	67 %
Select Jorge MARTÍN FRÍAS	Jorge MARTÍN FRÍAS	Patriots	Spain	73 % of 4 183 shared	68 %
Select Nikola BARTŮŠEK	Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group	ECR	Czechia	73 % of 4 400 shared	63 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on Constitutional AffairsAFCO Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Delegation for relations with the United StatesD-US Delegation	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation to the OACPS-EU Joint Parliamentary AssemblyDACP Parliamentary assembly	Substitute	27 Apr 2026	now
Delegation to the Pacific-EU Parliamentary AssemblyDPAC Parliamentary assembly	Substitute	27 Apr 2026	now
Committee on Industry, Research and EnergyITRE Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	14 Jul 2026
Delegation to the OACPS-EU Joint Parliamentary AssemblyDACP Parliamentary assembly	Member	19 Sept 2024	26 Apr 2026
Delegation to the Pacific-EU Parliamentary AssemblyDPAC Parliamentary assembly	Member	19 Sept 2024	26 Apr 2026

Show all 7 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
Permanent system for the allocation of seats in the European Parliament	Shadow rapporteur	AFCO	6 Jul 2026
European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded	Rapporteur	AFCO	5 May 2026
Laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2028 to 2034	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	AFCO	24 Feb 2026
Amendments to Parliament's Rules of Procedure concerning appointments to Union agencies and bodies (Rule 135)	Shadow rapporteur	AFCO	17 Feb 2026
Establishing harmonised requirements in the internal market on transparency of interest representation carried out on behalf of third countries and amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937	Opinion rapporteur	AFCO	5 Jun 2025
Establishing harmonised requirements in the internal market on transparency of interest representation carried out on behalf of third countries and amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	AFCO	5 Jun 2025
Stock-taking of the European elections 2024	Shadow rapporteur	AFCO	2 Jun 2025
Stock-taking of the European elections 2024	Shadow rapporteur	AFCO	13 May 2025
Amendments to Parliament’s Rules of Procedure concerning the declaration of input (Article 8 of Annex I to the Rules of Procedure)	Shadow rapporteur	AFCO	1 Apr 2025
Amendments to Parliament’s Rules of Procedure implementing the Agreement establishing the Ethics Body	Shadow rapporteur	AFCO	17 Mar 2025

Show all 11 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

56 contributions recorded; 16 on behalf of their group; 96 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
16 Sept 2026	State of the Union (debate) on behalf of ECR	Speech · 3 min	Read
6 Jul 2026	Order of business	Speech · 1 min	Read
17 Jun 2026	Preparation of the European Council (joint debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
15 Jun 2026	Order of business	Speech · 1 min	Read
20 May 2026	Reviewing the ETS system to support European competitiveness (topical debate) on behalf of ECR	Speech · 1 min	Read
19 May 2026	Europe's response to reduced US military deployments in Europe, particularly at its Eastern flank in the light of the latest US decisions (debate) on behalf of ECR	Speech · 2 min	Read
29 Apr 2026	Commission interference in democratic process and elections (topical debate) on behalf of ECR	Speech · 2 min	Read
29 Apr 2026	EU strategy in response to the ongoing Middle East crisis, its implications on energy prices and the availability of fertilizers (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
29 Apr 2026	EU strategy in response to the ongoing Middle East crisis, its implications on energy prices and the availability of fertilizers (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
25 Mar 2026	Conclusions of the European Council meeting of 19 March 2026 (debate) on behalf of ECR	Speech · 2 min	Read

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 15

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
16 Jul 2026	Constitutional coup by Péter Magyar’s government E-10-2026-003035	Written questionwith 42 co-authors	11 Sept 2026
6 Jul 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre B-10-2026-0356	Motion for a resolutionwith 29 co-authors	—
16 Apr 2026	Situation of the coking industry in the EU P-10-2026-001571	Priority written question	18 Jun 2026
9 Apr 2026	Repression of human rights advocates and politically motivated prosecutions in Vietnam E-10-2026-001447	Written questionwith 5 co-authors	10 Jul 2026
14 Jan 2026	MOTION OF CENSURE ON THE COMMISSION MOTION OF CENSURE ON THE COMMISSION B-10-2026-0063	Motion for a resolutionwith 109 co-authors	—
14 Jan 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION seeking an opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part, and the proposed Interim Agreement on Trade between the European Union, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part B-10-2026-0061	Motion for a resolutionwith 101 co-authors	—
12 Nov 2025	Nord Stream sabotage: Germany’s European arrest warrant against the suspected Ukrainian combatant E-10-2025-004492	Written questionwith 8 co-authors	26 Jan 2026
2 Jul 2025	MOTION OF CENSURE ON THE COMMISSION B-10-2025-0319	Motion for a resolutionwith 76 co-authors	—
18 Jun 2025	Actions on regulating third-party election campaigning and financing E-10-2025-002462	Written questionwith 22 co-authors	11 Aug 2025
12 Mar 2025	Concerns about the Commission’s neutrality in elections, given past cases of perceived interference amid Commissioner Virkkunen’s recent statement E-10-2025-001060	Written questionwith 25 co-authors	26 Jun 2025
10 Feb 2025	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on safeguarding the right to freedom of speech online B-10-2025-0099	Motion for a resolutionwith 17 co-authors	—
16 Jan 2025	Mediterranean Pact and the situation of Christians in the region P-10-2025-000187	Priority written questionwith 19 co-authors	28 Mar 2025
30 Sept 2024	Communication of flood alerts to Member States under the Copernicus system E-10-2024-001874	Written question	27 Nov 2024
20 Sept 2024	EU funding of physical border protection structures such as walls, fences or other barriers at the external border G-10-2024-001002	Major interpellationwith 29 co-authors	Not yet answered
17 Sept 2024	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the devastating floods in central and eastern Europe, the loss of lives and the EU’s preparedness to act on such disasters exacerbated by climate change B-10-2024-0060	Motion for a resolutionwith 27 co-authors	—

Amendments tabled in committee, 12

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
27 May 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards the extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures ITRE-AM-788838	ITRE	4
18 May 2026	Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards the extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures ITRE-AM-787939	ITRE	1
11 May 2026	Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards the extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures ITRE-AM-787997	ITRE	3
27 Apr 2026	Amending Regulation (EU) 2024/1252 ITRE-AM-787752	ITRE	7
27 Mar 2026	European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded AFCO-AM-786733	AFCO	10
12 Mar 2026	2025 Commission report on Albania AFET-AM-785348	AFET	5
9 Feb 2026	Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034 AFCO-AM-784339	AFCO	4
6 Feb 2026	Framework Agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the European Commission AFCO-AM-784243	AFCO	4
18 Jul 2025	Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiations AFCO-AM-775662	AFCO	33
14 Jul 2025	Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States AFCO-AM-775663	AFCO	4

Show all 12 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political groups this term

Group European Conservatives and Reformists ECR · Right-wing · national conservatism, EU-critical

National delegation

Delegation Poland National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197516?docs=all&period=2025&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Patryk JAKI”. Member record. memberId 197516. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197516?docs=all&period=2025&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197516. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/197516?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-197516,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Patryk JAKI}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197516?docs=all&period=2025&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197516?docs=all&period=2025&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 197516. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197516. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within ECR

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 15

Amendments tabled in committee, 12

Connections

Political groups this term

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928