Skip to content

Member

Jérémy DECERLE

Renew · France

Group
Renew
Country
France
Roll-call participation
85.7 %ⓘ of 3 503 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.2 % · whole term, roll calls
With majority line
95.2 %ⓘ of 2 999 votes where the group had a line · Renew median 95.5 %
More facts (5)
National party
Ren Renaissance
In office
Since 12 Oct 2025
Against clear line
101 of 2 912 votesⓘ
Committees
AGRI, SANT
Member id
197504
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

85.7 %

3 001 of 3 503 roll calls while in office

Renew median: 90.4 % (−4.8 pts)

Chamber median: 90.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

95.2 %

2 856 of 2 999 votes where their group had a line

Renew median: 95.5 % (−0.3 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

3.5 %

101 of 2 912 votes where their group had a clear line

68 opposite (for ↔ against), 31 abstained against the line, 2 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

1.6 %

47 of 3 001 votes cast

Participation 85.7 % — Renew median 90.4 %, 76 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 76 members of the Renew with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Jérémy DECERLE85.7 %
Renew median90.4 %
Lowest in the group65.3 %
Highest in the group99.7 %
Members76
With majority line 95.2 % — Renew median 95.5 %, 76 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 76 members of the Renew with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Jérémy DECERLE95.2 %
Renew median95.5 %
Lowest in the group77.5 %
Highest in the group98.3 %
Members76
  • Whole term, 5 928 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of Renew; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 3 503

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 28 503 for, 56 against, 90 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 38, adding text after paragraph 27 139 for, 491 against, 17 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 4 to paragraph 27 59 for, 561 against, 28 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 25 626 for, 18 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 41 to paragraph 23 438 for, 158 against, 44 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 40, adding text after paragraph 22 420 for, 158 against, 64 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 37, adding text after paragraph 20 211 for, 434 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 32, adding text after paragraph 18 88 for, 508 against, 53 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 12 499 for, 96 against, 56 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 30 to paragraph 12 98 for, 538 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 29, adding text after paragraph 10 96 for, 498 against, 58 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 10 617 for, 15 against, 21 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 9 127 for, 473 against, 53 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 9 328 for, 281 against, 40 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 28 to paragraph 9 106 for, 524 against, 19 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 8 116 for, 501 against, 27 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 24, adding text after paragraph 6 96 for, 510 against, 45 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 23, adding text after paragraph 6 125 for, 510 against, 19 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 6 482 for, 70 against, 103 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 22 to paragraph 6 113 for, 524 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 5 621 for, 20 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 19 to paragraph 2 107 for, 510 against, 33 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026Framework for achieving climate neutrality Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 413 for, 226 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Feb 2026European Union designs (codification) Final votePassed 613 for, 5 against, 29 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Feb 2026Framework for achieving climate neutrality Proposal to reject the text 224 for, 396 against, 27 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026Bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural products Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 483 for, 102 against, 67 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Feb 2026Bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural products Proposal to vote on amendments 206 for, 430 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026Amending the Measuring Instruments Directive Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 594 for, 25 against, 23 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Feb 2026Amending regulations on agricultural products as regards market rules and sectoral support measures in the wine sector and for aromatised wine products Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 625 for, 15 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Feb 2026Application of the ‘safe third country’ concept Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 396 for, 226 against, 30 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026Application of the ‘safe third country’ concept Proposal to reject the text 220 for, 396 against, 37 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Feb 2026Establishment of a list of safe countries of origin at Union level Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 408 for, 184 against, 60 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Abstained
9 Feb 2026Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group – Israel Wednesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group — Israel 171 for, 217 against, 34 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Feb 2026Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the Renew Group – Ukraine Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the Renew Group — Ukraine 278 for, 121 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 385 for, 165 against, 35 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Separate vote on recital T 429 for, 153 against, 26 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Recital Q — part 2 405 for, 155 against, 41 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Recital Q — part 1 421 for, 150 against, 35 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Recital P — part 2 426 for, 141 against, 42 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Recital P — part 1 419 for, 158 against, 25 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Recital O — part 2 398 for, 164 against, 40 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Recital O — part 1 426 for, 151 against, 31 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Recital L — part 2 328 for, 237 against, 33 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Recital L — part 1 425 for, 147 against, 37 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Separate vote on recital K 406 for, 149 against, 50 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Recital J — part 2 327 for, 235 against, 42 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Recital J — part 1 422 for, 107 against, 73 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Paragraph 11 — part 2 412 for, 171 against, 28 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Paragraph 11 — part 1 430 for, 157 against, 20 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Paragraph 10 — part 2 334 for, 259 against, 18 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 6 of 47 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Renew

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Valérie DEVAUX RenewFrance97 % of 2 969 shared92 %
Grégory ALLIONE RenewFrance97 % of 2 412 shared92 %
Fabienne KELLER RenewFrance97 % of 2 958 shared92 %
Bernard GUETTA RenewFrance97 % of 2 843 shared92 %
Gilles BOYER RenewFrance97 % of 2 992 shared92 %
Sandro GOZI RenewFrance97 % of 2 800 shared92 %
Stéphanie YON-COURTIN RenewFrance97 % of 2 278 shared92 %
Pascal CANFIN RenewFrance97 % of 2 514 shared92 %
Nathalie LOISEAU RenewFrance97 % of 2 761 shared92 %
Valérie HAYER RenewFrance96 % of 2 870 shared92 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Dan NICA S&DRomania90 % of 1 771 shared86 %
Carla TAVARES S&DPortugal90 % of 2 718 shared86 %
Dragoş BENEA S&DRomania90 % of 1 676 shared86 %
Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ S&DSpain90 % of 2 721 shared86 %
Vilija BLINKEVIČIŪTĖ S&DLithuania90 % of 2 743 shared86 %
Isilda GOMES S&DPortugal89 % of 2 701 shared86 %
Lina GÁLVEZ S&DSpain89 % of 2 491 shared86 %
Sérgio GONÇALVES S&DPortugal89 % of 2 950 shared86 %
Aodhán Ó RÍORDÁIN S&DIreland89 % of 2 108 shared86 %
Francisco ASSIS S&DPortugal89 % of 2 444 shared86 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Agriculture and Rural DevelopmentAGRI CommitteeMember23 Oct 2025now
Committee on Public HealthSANT CommitteeMember10 Mar 2026now
Intergroup on Sustainable LivestockIG10-15 Intergroup / working groupMember20 Mar 2026now
Committee on International TradeINTA CommitteeMember23 Oct 20259 Mar 2026

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
No dossier namedOfficial delegationAGRI17 Sept 2026
Generational renewal in agricultureShadow rapporteurAGRI30 Apr 2026
Amending Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 as regards the school fruit, vegetables and milk scheme (‘EU school scheme’), sectoral interventions, the creation of a protein sector, requirements for hemp, the possibility for marketing standards for cheese, protein crops and meat, application of additional import duties, rules on the availability of supplies in time of emergencies and severe crisis and securitiesShadow rapporteurAGRI30 Apr 2026
Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the People`s Republic of China pursuant to Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions on all the tariff rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV as a consequence of the United Kingdom's withdrawal from the European UnionRapporteurINTA30 Jan 2026
Amending Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 as regards the school fruit, vegetables and milk scheme (‘EU school scheme’), sectoral interventions, the creation of a protein sector, requirements for hemp, the possibility for marketing standards for cheese, protein crops and meat, application of additional import duties, rules on the availability of supplies in time of emergencies and severe crisis and securitiesShadow rapporteurAGRI30 Jan 2026

Show all 5 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

2 contributions recorded; 1 on behalf of their group; 2 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
30 Apr 2026How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers’ resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases? (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
12 Feb 2026Cooperation among enforcement authorities regarding unfair trading practices in the agri-food supply chain (debate) on behalf of RenewSpeech · 1 minRead

Questions and motions, 1

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Amendments tabled in committee, 48

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
17 Jul 2026Strengthening competitiveness, resilience and fairness in EU agriculture AGRI-AM-791100 AGRI23
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790957 AGRI21
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790958 AGRI7
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790964 AGRI6
13 Jul 2026Establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Union’s biotechnology and biomanufacturing sectors particularly in the area of health and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1394/2007, (EU) No 536/2014, (EU) 2019/6, (EU) 2024/795 and (EU) 2024/1938 (European Biotech Act) CJ53-AM-790934 CJ535
13 Jul 2026Establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Union’s biotechnology and biomanufacturing sectors particularly in the area of health and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1394/2007, (EU) No 536/2014, (EU) 2019/6, (EU) 2024/795 and (EU) 2024/1938 (European Biotech Act) CJ53-AM-790935 CJ531
13 Jul 2026Establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Union’s biotechnology and biomanufacturing sectors particularly in the area of health and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1394/2007, (EU) No 536/2014, (EU) 2019/6, (EU) 2024/795 and (EU) 2024/1938 (European Biotech Act) CJ53-AM-790953 CJ531
13 Jul 2026Establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Union’s biotechnology and biomanufacturing sectors particularly in the area of health and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1394/2007, (EU) No 536/2014, (EU) 2019/6, (EU) 2024/795 and (EU) 2024/1938 (European Biotech Act) CJ53-AM-790938 CJ533
13 Jul 2026Establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Union’s biotechnology and biomanufacturing sectors particularly in the area of health and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1394/2007, (EU) No 536/2014, (EU) 2019/6, (EU) 2024/795 and (EU) 2024/1938 (European Biotech Act) CJ53-AM-790936 CJ534
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790899 AGRI12

Show all 48 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

  • Group Renew Europe Renew · Centre · liberalism, pro-Europeanism

National delegation

  • Delegation France National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
29 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Jérémy DECERLE”. Member record. memberId 197504. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197504?page=46&seats=all&vscope=all (retrieved 29 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197504. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/197504?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-197504,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Jérémy DECERLE}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197504?page=46&seats=all&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197504?page=46&seats=all&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-29},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 197504. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197504. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}