Decision

European Union designs (codification)

Effect: Passed
Result: 613 for · 5 against · 29 abstained roll call
Date: 10 February 2026, 13:06
Kind: New EU law · 1st reading

More facts (8)

Margin: by an overwhelming majority
Text: Report A-10-2026-0013
Dossier: 2025/0190(COD)
Source: Committee report by Magdalena Adamowicz
Topics: Economy & single market Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes: 1 vote · 1 roll call
Sitting: Tuesday 10 February 2026
Final vote: 184118

Margin: by an overwhelming majority
Text: Report A-10-2026-0013
Dossier: 2025/0190(COD)
Source: Committee report by Magdalena Adamowicz
Topics: Economy & single market Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes: 1 vote · 1 roll call
Sitting: Tuesday 10 February 2026
Final vote: 184118

Cite this page Roll-call results (EP)

Link to this page

Votes on this decision

Members on the final vote

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Passed by an overwhelming majority.

Parliament adopted its position on the law.

Backed by The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew, EPP, ECR and Patriots; ESN mostly abstained.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. **No vote**: in office that day, no position recorded. **Majority line**: the most common position. **Clear line**: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. **Cohesion**: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
Group	For	Against	Abst.	No vote	Majority line	Clear line	Cohesion
The Left	For 40	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 6 of 46	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
Greens	For 48	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 5 of 53	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
S&D	For 121	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 14 of 135	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
Renew	For 68	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 7 of 75	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
EPP	For 176	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 11 of 187	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
ECR	For 67	Against 0	Abst. 3	No vote 9 of 79	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.94
Patriots	For 65	Against 0	Abst. 6	No vote 13 of 84	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.87
ESN	For 2	Against 3	Abst. 18	No vote 4 of 27	Majority line Abstained	Clear line Abstained	Cohesion 0.67
No group	For 26	Against 2	Abst. 2	No vote 2 of 32	Majority line —	Clear line No line	Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 14

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

ECR line For · 3 abstained of 70 who voted
Abstained (3)
- Beatrice TIMGREN Sweden
- Charlie WEIMERS Sweden
- Dick ERIXON Sweden
Patriots line For · 6 abstained of 71 who voted
Abstained (6)
- Elisabeth DIERINGER Austria
- Georg MAYER Austria
- Gerald HAUSER Austria
- Harald VILIMSKY Austria
- Petra STEGER Austria
- Roman HAIDER Austria
ESN line Abstained · 5 voted for or against of 23 who voted
Voted for or against (5)
- Markus BUCHHEIT Germany
- Petar VOLGIN Bulgaria
- Petras GRAŽULIS Lithuania
- Rada LAYKOVA Bulgaria
- Stanislav STOYANOV Bulgaria

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)

Members' votes by country. **No vote**: in office that day, no position recorded. **Cohesion**: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
Country	For	Against	Abst.	No vote	Cohesion
Austria	13	0	6	1	0.53
Belgium	17	0	0	5	1.00
Bulgaria	12	3	0	2	0.70
Cyprus	5	0	0	1	—
Czechia	17	0	1	3	0.92
Germany	78	0	11	7	0.81
Denmark	15	0	0	0	1.00
Estonia	7	0	0	0	—
Spain	55	0	0	5	1.00
Finland	14	0	0	1	1.00
France	70	0	0	11	1.00
Greece	19	2	0	0	0.86
Croatia	12	0	0	0	1.00
Hungary	15	0	1	5	0.91
Ireland	13	0	0	1	1.00
Italy	64	0	1	10	0.98
Lithuania	10	0	0	1	1.00
Luxembourg	6	0	0	0	—
Latvia	7	0	0	2	—
Malta	5	0	0	1	—
Netherlands	28	0	0	3	1.00
Poland	45	0	3	5	0.91
Portugal	18	0	0	3	1.00
Romania	29	0	1	3	0.95
Sweden	18	0	3	0	0.79
Slovenia	9	0	0	0	—
Slovakia	12	0	2	1	0.79

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 647 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. **Speeches**: how many times they took the floor. **Final vote**: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
Member	Group	Speeches	Spoke	Final vote
Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS Spain	EPP	Speeches1	10 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site)	For

All votes on this decision, 1

In voting order. **Result**: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.	Vote	Recorded	Result	Requested by
1	Final vote A10-0013/2026 – Magdalena Adamowicz – Commission proposal	Roll call	613 for, 5 against, 29 abstained Adopted

Text

The text voted on.

Report A-10-2026-0013

What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

The proposal codifies existing EU rules on designs into a single regulation, without changing their substance.

Parliament adopted its position at first reading, taking over the Commission proposal as adapted to the recommendations of the legal services.

Parliament instructed its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission, and national parliaments.

Read the text · Report a problem

The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament adopts its first-reading position on the codified regulation on European Union designs, taking over the Commission proposal as adapted to the recommendations of the legal services.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2025/0190(COD) · Ordinary legislative procedure

Completed: published in the Official Journal on 30 March 2026 and now EU law.

Show the 6 steps of the dossier

Referred to committee · 8 September 2025 (done)
Committee work · Report adopted 28 January 2026 (done)
Tabled for plenary · 4 February 2026 (done)
Plenary vote · Adopted 10 February 2026 (done)
Negotiations with the Council (done)
Published as law · 30 March 2026 (done)

Lead committee: JURI · Rapporteur: Magdalena ADAMOWICZ (EPP)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 3 connections: Other decisions of the part-session on JURI dossiers

Other decisions of the part-session on JURI dossiers

Decision Request for the waiver of the immunity of Petr Bystron Immunity decision · committee report 10 Feb 2026 Immunity waived
Decision Accession of the Republic of Albania to the Convention of 2 July 2019 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters Resolution · motion for a resolution 12 Feb 2026 Adopted
Decision Accession of Montenegro to the Convention of 2 July 2019 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters Resolution · motion for a resolution 12 Feb 2026 Adopted

See all

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-02-10/7
Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 February 2026 (European Parliament)
Results of votes, sitting of 10 February 2026 (European Parliament)
Data source: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-10
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “European Union designs (codification)”. Decision, 10 February 2026. votingId 184118, document A-10-2026-0013, reference 2025/0190(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-02-10/7 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-02-10/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).

BibTeX

@misc{epw-decision-2026-02-10-7,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{European Union designs (codification)}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-02-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-02-10/7}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-02-10/7},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 184118, document A-10-2026-0013, reference 2025/0190(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}