Skip to content

Decision

Bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural products

Effect
Passed
Result
483 for · 102 against · 67 abstained roll call
Date
10 February 2026, 13:02
Kind
New EU law · 1st reading
More facts (9)
Margin
by a large majority
Source
Committee report by Gabriel Mato
Topics
Agriculture, food & fisheriesForeign affairsTrade & customs Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes
30 votes · 22 roll calls
Requested by
The Left (1 roll call) · Members (1 roll call)
Final vote
184191
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 483 for, 102 against, 67 abstained (roll call).

Passed by a large majority.

Parliament adopted its position on the law.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 24 parts of the text voted on separately (24 lapsed).

Backed by Greens, S&D, Renew, EPP, ECR and ESN; opposed by Patriots; The Left mostly abstained.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 3Against 9Abst. 30No vote 4 of 46Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.57
GreensFor 34Against 0Abst. 14No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.56
S&DFor 105Against 3Abst. 13No vote 14 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.80
RenewFor 68Against 1Abst. 0No vote 6 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 170Against 7Abst. 0No vote 10 of 187Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
ECRFor 52Against 21Abst. 0No vote 6 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.57
PatriotsFor 14Against 56Abst. 0No vote 14 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.70
ESNFor 21Against 1Abst. 0No vote 5 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
No groupFor 16Against 4Abst. 10No vote 2 of 32Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 86

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria190011.00
Belgium103450.38
Bulgaria160011.00
Cyprus3111—
Czechia170130.92
Germany7621170.78
Denmark140100.90
Estonia7000—
Spain416850.62
Finland120210.79
France25252470.01
Greece812100.36
Croatia120001.00
Hungary312060.70
Ireland94010.54
Italy48710100.61
Lithuania100011.00
Luxembourg5010—
Latvia6102—
Malta5001—
Netherlands227020.64
Poland2721050.34
Portugal151230.75
Romania300031.00
Sweden210001.00
Slovenia8010—
Slovakia140011.00

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 652 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. Speeches: how many times they took the floor. Final vote: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Gabriel MATO SpainEPPSpeeches310 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Roberta METSOLA MaltaEPPSpeeches216 Dec 2025 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Nicolas BAY FranceECRSpeeches116 Dec 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Gilles PENNELLE FrancePatriotsSpeeches116 Dec 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group Against
Svenja HAHN GermanyRenewSpeeches116 Dec 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Saskia BRICMONT BelgiumGreensSpeeches116 Dec 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group No vote recorded
Show the other 4 speakers
Debate speakers, continued
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Manon AUBRY FranceThe LeftSpeeches116 Dec 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group Abstained
Ivan DAVID CzechiaESNSpeeches116 Dec 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Francesco TORSELLI ItalyECRSpeeches116 Dec 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Francisco ASSIS PortugalS&DSpeeches116 Dec 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For

All votes on this decision, 30

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Proposal to vote on amendments A10-0254/2025 – Gabriel Mato – Proposal to vote on amendments Roll call206 for, 430 against, 12 abstained Rejected
2Final vote on the provisional agreement A10-0254/2025 – Gabriel Mato – Provisional agreement – Am 89 Roll call483 for, 102 against, 67 abstained Adopted
3Commission statement Show of hands Adopted
Show the other 29 votesShow the other 27 votes
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
2Final vote on the provisional agreement A10-0254/2025 – Gabriel Mato – Provisional agreement – Am 89 Roll call483 for, 102 against, 67 abstained Adopted
3Commission statement Show of hands Adopted
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
4Final vote Text as a whole Show of hands Lapsed
5Separate vote on Article 1, paragraph 2 Show of hands Lapsed
6Separate vote on Article 1, paragraph 2 Show of hands Lapsed
7Separate vote on Article 2, paragraph 1, point 5 Roll call0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained Lapsed
8Separate vote on Article 2, paragraph 1, point 10 Roll call0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained Lapsed
9Separate vote on Article 3, paragraph 1, introductory part Roll call0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained Lapsed
10Separate vote on Article 3, paragraph 1, point c Roll call0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained Lapsed
11Separate vote on Article 3, after paragraph 1 Roll call0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained Lapsed
12Separate vote on Article 3, after paragraph 1 Roll call0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained Lapsed
13Separate vote on Article 3, paragraph 2, after point a Roll call0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained Lapsed
14Separate vote on Article 3, paragraph 2, after point c Roll call0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained Lapsed
15Separate vote on Article 3, after paragraph 2 Roll call0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained Lapsed
16Separate vote on Article 4, paragraph 3 Show of hands Lapsed
17Separate vote on Article 6, paragraph 3 Roll call0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained Lapsed
18Separate vote on Article 6, paragraph 3 Show of hands Lapsed
19Separate vote on Article 6, paragraph 4 Roll call0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained Lapsed
20Separate vote on Article 6, paragraph 4 Show of hands Lapsed
21Separate vote on Article 7, paragraph 5 Roll call0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained Lapsed
22Separate vote on Article 9, paragraph 1, after point b Roll call0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained Lapsed
23Separate vote on Article 9, paragraph 1, point c Roll call0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained Lapsed
24Separate vote on Article 9, after paragraph 7 Roll call0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained Lapsed
25Vote on text inserted after Article 9 Roll call0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained Lapsed
26Separate vote on Article 11, paragraph 1 Roll call0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained Lapsed
27Separate vote on Article 11, paragraph 3 Roll call0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained Lapsed
28Vote on text inserted after Article 12 Roll call0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained Lapsed
29Final vote Commission proposal Roll call0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained Lapsed
30Commission statement Show of hands Lapsed

Roll calls requested by The Left, Members.

Text

The text voted on.

Report A-10-2025-0254

AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament adopted its position on a proposed EU law implementing the bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural products.

The law aims to protect sensitive EU agricultural sectors by allowing swift, proportionate safeguard measures when imports from Mercosur countries cause or threaten serious injury to EU producers.

Parliament's position includes amendments to the Commission's proposal, and it calls on the Commission to refer the matter back if it substantially changes the text.

Read the text · Report a problem

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament's amended version of the proposed regulation implementing the bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur agreements for agricultural products tightens monitoring, lowers injury thresholds, shortens deadlines, and adds anti-circumvention rules.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2025/0322(COD) · Ordinary legislative procedure

Implementing the bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural products

Completed: published in the Official Journal on 19 March 2026 and now EU law.

Show the 6 steps of the dossier
  1. Referred to committee · 24 November 2025 (done)
  2. Committee work · Report adopted 8 December 2025 (done)
  3. Tabled for plenary · 9 December 2025 (done)
  4. Negotiations with the Council · Deal approved in committee 27 January 2026 (done)
  5. Plenary vote · Adopted 10 February 2026 (done)
  6. Published as law · 19 March 2026 (done)

Lead committee: INTA · Rapporteur: Gabriel MATO (EPP)

Other decisions on this dossier

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 12 connections: Other decisions on this dossier · Running issue: EU-Mercosur agreement · Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Other decisions on this dossier

See all: Other decisions on this dossier

Running issue: EU-Mercosur agreement

Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural products”. Decision, 10 February 2026. votingId 184191, document A-10-2025-0254, reference 2025/0322(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-02-10/5 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-02-10/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2026-02-10-5,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural products}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-02-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-02-10/5}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-02-10/5},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 184191, document A-10-2025-0254, reference 2025/0322(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}