Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Final vote

European Union designs (codification)

Vote
Final vote
Decision
No. 7 of the sitting of 10 Feb 2026
Result
613 for · 5 against · 29 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
10 February 2026, 13:06
More facts (6)
Effect
Passed — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 1 of 1 on the decision
Official label
A10-0013/2026 – Magdalena Adamowicz – Commission proposal
Text
Report A-10-2026-0013
Dossier
2025/0190(COD)
Vote id
184118
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 613 for, 5 against, 29 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 95 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Passed.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 40Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 48Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 121Against 0Abst. 0No vote 14 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 68Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 176Against 0Abst. 0No vote 11 of 187Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 67Against 0Abst. 3No vote 9 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
PatriotsFor 65Against 0Abst. 6No vote 13 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.87
ESNFor 2Against 3Abst. 18No vote 4 of 27Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.67
No groupFor 26Against 2Abst. 2No vote 2 of 32Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium200
Cyprus100
Germany400
Denmark100
Spain300
Finland300
France700
Greece400
Ireland300
Italy700
Netherlands100
Portugal200
Sweden200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 647 members

No vote recorded, 71

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 71 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

The minority on this vote was under 10 % of the votes cast — too small to compare how it split the chamber.

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 1 connection: The decision

The decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-10/184118
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Final vote — European Union designs (codification)”. Vote, 10 February 2026. votingId 184118, reference 2025/0190(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-10/184118 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-02-10/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-02-10-184118,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Final vote — European Union designs (codification)}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-02-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-10/184118}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-10/184118},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 184118, reference 2025/0190(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}