Member

Markus FERBER

EPP · Germany

Group: EPP PPE
Country: Germany
Roll-call participation: 96.6 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line: 93.2 %ⓘ of 599 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 95.6 %

More facts (5)

National party: CSU Christlich-Soziale Union in Bayern e.V.
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 15 of 559 votesⓘ
Committees: ECON, TRAN (substitute)
Member id: 1917

National party: CSU Christlich-Soziale Union in Bayern e.V.
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 15 of 559 votesⓘ
Committees: ECON, TRAN (substitute)
Member id: 1917

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes620 All roll calls5 928

Roll-call participation ⓘ

96.6 %

599 of 620 final votes while in office

EPP median: 90.6 % (+6.0 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

93.2 %

558 of 599 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 95.6 % (−2.4 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

2.7 %

15 of 559 votes where their group had a clear line

9 opposite (for ↔ against), 6 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

1.0 %

6 of 599 votes cast

Participation 96.6 % — EPP median 90.6 %, 192 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 192 members of the EPP with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Markus FERBER	96.6 %
EPP median	90.6 %
Lowest in the group	18.4 %
Highest in the group	99.8 %
Members	192

With majority line 93.2 % — EPP median 95.6 %, 192 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 192 members of the EPP with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Markus FERBER	93.2 %
EPP median	95.6 %
Lowest in the group	67.8 %
Highest in the group	99.0 %
Members	192

Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H	181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3	381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2	338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1	524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E	84 for, 484 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D	193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C	204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C	215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C	209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C	95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B	345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A	459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5	439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1	392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15	448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2	297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1	304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14	92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13	330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2	351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13	195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12	390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4	441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3	427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12	231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11	208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11	235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10	277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3	353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2	363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1	390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9	203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9	266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8	215 for, 335 against, 54 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8	261 for, 316 against, 27 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7	395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7	177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7	204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7	202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7	253 for, 329 against, 22 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 2 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
17 Jul 2024	1	1
18 Sept 2024	2	2
19 Sept 2024	6	6
8 Oct 2024	1	1
9 Oct 2024	2	2
10 Oct 2024	1	1
22 Oct 2024	5	4
23 Oct 2024	2	2
24 Oct 2024	2	2
14 Nov 2024	5	5
26 Nov 2024	8	8
27 Nov 2024	7	7
28 Nov 2024	6	6
17 Dec 2024	6	6
18 Dec 2024	7	7
19 Dec 2024	5	4
21 Jan 2025	1	1
22 Jan 2025	1	1
23 Jan 2025	4	3
11 Feb 2025	4	4
12 Feb 2025	4	4
13 Feb 2025	2	0
11 Mar 2025	4	4
12 Mar 2025	7	7
13 Mar 2025	3	3
1 Apr 2025	7	7
2 Apr 2025	9	9
3 Apr 2025	5	5
6 May 2025	4	4
7 May 2025	20	20
8 May 2025	12	11
22 May 2025	6	6
17 Jun 2025	8	8
18 Jun 2025	7	6
19 Jun 2025	6	6
8 Jul 2025	8	8
9 Jul 2025	14	13
10 Jul 2025	7	7
9 Sept 2025	6	6
10 Sept 2025	15	15
11 Sept 2025	8	8
7 Oct 2025	4	4
8 Oct 2025	10	8
9 Oct 2025	10	10
21 Oct 2025	8	8
22 Oct 2025	6	6
23 Oct 2025	5	5
13 Nov 2025	16	16
25 Nov 2025	13	12
26 Nov 2025	10	10
27 Nov 2025	11	11
16 Dec 2025	11	11
17 Dec 2025	11	11
18 Dec 2025	6	6
20 Jan 2026	6	6
21 Jan 2026	8	8
22 Jan 2026	8	8
10 Feb 2026	8	8
11 Feb 2026	10	10
12 Feb 2026	8	0
24 Feb 2026	1	1
10 Mar 2026	9	9
11 Mar 2026	12	12
12 Mar 2026	6	6
26 Mar 2026	13	12
28 Apr 2026	14	14
29 Apr 2026	17	16
30 Apr 2026	11	11
19 May 2026	3	3
20 May 2026	12	12
21 May 2026	10	10
16 Jun 2026	10	10
17 Jun 2026	16	16
18 Jun 2026	7	7
7 Jul 2026	15	15
8 Jul 2026	15	15
9 Jul 2026	4	4
15 Sept 2026	12	12
16 Sept 2026	16	16
17 Sept 2026	10	10

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Manfred WEBER	Manfred WEBER	EPP	Germany	98 % of 4 538 shared	89 %
Select Axel VOSS	Axel VOSS	EPP	Germany	98 % of 4 420 shared	89 %
Select Alexandra MEHNERT	Alexandra MEHNERT	EPP	Germany	98 % of 4 928 shared	89 %
Select Christine SCHNEIDER	Christine SCHNEIDER Former member	EPP	Germany	98 % of 3 505 shared	89 %
Select Lena DÜPONT	Lena DÜPONT	EPP	Germany	98 % of 4 616 shared	89 %
Select Stefan KÖHLER	Stefan KÖHLER	EPP	Germany	98 % of 5 152 shared	89 %
Select Ralf SEEKATZ	Ralf SEEKATZ	EPP	Germany	98 % of 5 012 shared	89 %
Select Verena MERTENS	Verena MERTENS	EPP	Germany	98 % of 5 072 shared	89 %
Select Oliver SCHENK	Oliver SCHENK	EPP	Germany	97 % of 5 564 shared	89 %
Select Marion WALSMANN	Marion WALSMANN	EPP	Germany	97 % of 5 501 shared	89 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Urmas PAET	Urmas PAET	Renew	Estonia	88 % of 5 054 shared	82 %
Select Dan BARNA	Dan BARNA	Renew	Romania	87 % of 4 969 shared	82 %
Select Eugen TOMAC	Eugen TOMAC	Renew	Romania	87 % of 4 051 shared	82 %
Select Jan-Christoph OETJEN	Jan-Christoph OETJEN	Renew	Germany	86 % of 5 467 shared	82 %
Select Hilde VAUTMANS	Hilde VAUTMANS	Renew	Belgium	86 % of 5 466 shared	82 %
Select Katri KULMUNI	Katri KULMUNI	Renew	Finland	86 % of 4 432 shared	82 %
Select Moritz KÖRNER	Moritz KÖRNER	Renew	Germany	86 % of 5 519 shared	82 %
Select Anna STÜRGKH	Anna STÜRGKH	Renew	Austria	86 % of 4 188 shared	82 %
Select Bart GROOTHUIS	Bart GROOTHUIS	Renew	Netherlands	86 % of 4 275 shared	82 %
Select Olivier CHASTEL	Olivier CHASTEL	Renew	Belgium	86 % of 5 082 shared	82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on Economic and Monetary AffairsECON Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Transport and TourismTRAN Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Subcommittee on Tax MattersFISC Subcommittee	Vice-chair	23 Jul 2024	now
Special Committee on the Housing Crisis in the European UnionHOUS Special committee	Member	23 Jan 2025	now
Delegation to the EU-Chile Joint Parliamentary CommitteeD-CL Joint parliamentary committee	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation for relations with the countries of the Andean CommunityDAND Delegation	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary AssemblyDLAT Parliamentary assembly	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Intergroup on Sky and SpaceIG10-21 Intergroup / working group	Member	27 Feb 2025	now
Subcommittee on Tax MattersFISC Subcommittee	Member	19 Jul 2024	22 Jul 2024

Show all 9 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
17th Ordinary Plenary Session of the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly. Mr Ferber will take part in the Committee on Economic, Financial and Commercial Affairs.	Official delegation	DLAT	15 Sept 2026
No dossier named	Official delegation	ECON	21 May 2026
EP Delegation to the Conciliation Committee on Air Passenger Rights 2013/0072(COD)	Trilogue negotiator		5 Feb 2026
Amending Regulations (EU) No 1095/2010, No 648/2012, No 600/2014, No 909/2014, 2015/2365, 2019/1156, 2021/23, 2022/858, 2023/1114, No 1060/2009, 2016/1011, 2017/2402, 2023/2631 and 2024/3005 as regards the further development of capital market integration and supervision within the Union	Rapporteur	ECON	20 Jan 2026
Settlement finality and repealing Directive 98/26/EC and amending Directive 2002/47/EC on financial collateral arrangements	Shadow rapporteur	ECON	20 Jan 2026
Amending Directives 2009/65/EC, 2011/61/EU and 2014/65/EU as regards the further development of capital market integration and supervision within the Union	Shadow rapporteur	ECON	20 Jan 2026
Amending Regulations (EU) No 1173/2011 and (EU) No 473/2013 as regards alignment with the EU economic governance framework and further simplification of that framework	Rapporteur	ECON	15 Dec 2025
Amending Regulation (EU) No 472/2013 as regards the economic and budgetary surveillance of Member States in the euro area experiencing or threatened with serious difficulties with respect to their financial stability	Rapporteur	ECON	15 Dec 2025
Amending Council Regulation (EC) No 332/2002 as regards funding arrangements and the use of a diversified funding strategy	Rapporteur	ECON	15 Dec 2025
Tackling barriers to the single market for defence	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	ECON	26 Nov 2025

Show all 26 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

33 contributions recorded; 14 on behalf of their group; 60 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
16 Sept 2026	Stop gold-plating, relieve SMEs: Member States must implement EU legislation without adding extra bureaucracy (topical debate)	Speech · 4 min	Read
15 Jun 2026	Time for European economic independence (debate) on behalf of EPP	Speech · 2 min	Read
20 May 2026	Reviewing the ETS system to support European competitiveness (topical debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
11 Mar 2026	Savings and Investments Union: time to accelerate the process to deepen market integration (debate) on behalf of EPP	Speech · 2 min	Read
10 Mar 2026	European Semester (joint debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
10 Mar 2026	Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
9 Feb 2026	European Central Bank – annual report 2025 (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
16 Dec 2025	Presentation of the European Affordable Housing Plan (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
16 Dec 2025	Presentation of the European Affordable Housing Plan (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
26 Nov 2025	Protecting citizens' right to make cash payments and ensuring financial inclusion (debate) on behalf of EPP	Speech · 2 min	Read
25 Nov 2025	Increasing the efficiency of the EU guarantee under the InvestEU Regulation and simplifying reporting requirements (debate) on behalf of EPP	Speech · 2 min	Read
21 Oct 2025	Stepping up funding for Ukraine’s reconstruction and defence: the use of Russian frozen assets (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
8 Sept 2025	Investments and reforms for European competitiveness and the creation of a Capital Markets Union (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
7 Jul 2025	Financial activities of the European Investment Bank – annual report 2024 (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
17 Jun 2025	Latest developments on the revision of the air passenger rights and airline liability regulations (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
17 Jun 2025	Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility (debate) on behalf of EPP	Speech · 2 min	Read
7 May 2025	Competition policy – annual report 2024 (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
31 Mar 2025	Savings and Investments Union (debate) on behalf of EPP	Speech · 2 min	Read
12 Mar 2025	Frozen Russian assets (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
12 Mar 2025	European Semester (joint debate) on behalf of EPP	Speech · 2 min	Read
10 Mar 2025	Cutting red tape and simplifying business in the EU: the first Omnibus proposals (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
12 Feb 2025	Competitiveness Compass (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
10 Feb 2025	European Central Bank – annual report 2024 (debate) on behalf of EPP	Speech · 2 min	Read
23 Jan 2025	Cryptocurrencies - need for global standards (debate) on behalf of EPP	Speech · 2 min	Read
21 Jan 2025	Geopolitical and economic implications for the transatlantic relations under the new Trump administration (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
21 Jan 2025	Geopolitical and economic implications for the transatlantic relations under the new Trump administration (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
18 Dec 2024	Restoring the EU’s competitive edge – the need for an impact assessment on the Green Deal policies (topical debate) on behalf of EPP	Speech · 2 min	Read
26 Nov 2024	The Autumn 2024 Economic Forecast: a gradual rebound in an adverse environment (debate) on behalf of EPP	Speech · 2 min	Read
13 Nov 2024	Fight against money laundering and terrorist financing: listing Russia as a high-risk third country in the EU (debate) on behalf of EPP	Speech · 2 min	Read
23 Oct 2024	U-turn on EU bureaucracy: the need to axe unnecessary burdens and reporting to unleash competitiveness and innovation (topical debate) on behalf of EPP	Speech · 2 min	Read
9 Oct 2024	Ensuring sustainable, decent and affordable housing in Europe - encouraging investment, private property and public housing programmes (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
19 Sept 2024	The historic CJEU ruling on the Apple state aid case and its consequences (debate) on behalf of EPP	Speech · 2 min	Read
17 Sept 2024	The future of European competitiveness (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read

Questions and motions, 9

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
10 Sept 2026	Potential market disruption linked to the European Positive List process under Directive (EU) 2020/2184 E-10-2026-003614	Written questionwith 9 co-authors	Not yet answered
23 Jul 2026	Energy Performance of Buildings Directive E-10-2026-003113	Written questionwith 17 co-authors	Not yet answered
16 Jul 2026	Preventing the unwarranted classification of linear and logistic regression models as AI systems E-10-2026-003010	Written questionwith 2 co-authors	17 Sept 2026
6 May 2026	Practical feasibility of labelling requirements for secondary and tertiary reusable packaging under Articles 12 and 15(8) PPWR E-10-2026-001856	Written questionwith 12 co-authors	10 Jul 2026
15 Dec 2025	Procedural gaps and the agricultural and supply-chain impact of the proposed REACH restriction on calcium cyanamide E-10-2025-004943	Written questionwith 7 co-authors	11 Feb 2026
20 Nov 2025	Authorisation of cross-border rolling stock E-10-2025-004640	Written question	13 Feb 2026
17 Nov 2025	Ensuring that prudential requirements under the Capital Requirements Regulation/Capital Requirements Directive do not undermine the omnibus package’s efforts to simplify reporting for SMEs E-10-2025-004575	Written questionwith 4 co-authors	5 Mar 2026
8 May 2025	Importance of regional airport infrastructure E-10-2025-001864	Written questionwith 3 co-authors	30 Jul 2025
19 Sept 2024	Impact of climate policy on the employment rate in the mobility sector E-10-2024-001770	Written questionwith 20 co-authors	17 Dec 2024

Show all 9 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 103

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
31 Jul 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) No 1095/2010, No 648/2012, No 600/2014, No 909/2014, 2015/2365, 2019/1156, 2021/23, 2022/858, 2023/1114, No 1060/2009, 2016/1011, 2017/2402, 2023/2631 and 2024/3005 as regards the further development of capital market integration and supervision within the Union ECON-AM-791103	ECON	6
31 Jul 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) No 1095/2010, No 648/2012, No 600/2014, No 909/2014, 2015/2365, 2019/1156, 2021/23, 2022/858, 2023/1114, No 1060/2009, 2016/1011, 2017/2402, 2023/2631 and 2024/3005 as regards the further development of capital market integration and supervision within the Union ECON-AM-791134	ECON	7
31 Jul 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) No 1095/2010, No 648/2012, No 600/2014, No 909/2014, 2015/2365, 2019/1156, 2021/23, 2022/858, 2023/1114, No 1060/2009, 2016/1011, 2017/2402, 2023/2631 and 2024/3005 as regards the further development of capital market integration and supervision within the Union ECON-AM-791137	ECON	9
31 Jul 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) No 1095/2010, No 648/2012, No 600/2014, No 909/2014, 2015/2365, 2019/1156, 2021/23, 2022/858, 2023/1114, No 1060/2009, 2016/1011, 2017/2402, 2023/2631 and 2024/3005 as regards the further development of capital market integration and supervision within the Union ECON-AM-791136	ECON	5
31 Jul 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) No 1095/2010, No 648/2012, No 600/2014, No 909/2014, 2015/2365, 2019/1156, 2021/23, 2022/858, 2023/1114, No 1060/2009, 2016/1011, 2017/2402, 2023/2631 and 2024/3005 as regards the further development of capital market integration and supervision within the Union ECON-AM-791135	ECON	8
27 Jul 2026	on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 2009/65/EC, 2011/61/EU and 2014/65/EU as regards the further development of capital market integration and supervision within the Union ECON-AM-791083	ECON	24
27 Jul 2026	on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 2009/65/EC, 2011/61/EU and 2014/65/EU as regards the further development of capital market integration and supervision within the Union ECON-AM-791126	ECON	8
20 Jul 2026	Settlement finality and repealing Directive 98/26/EC and amending Directive 2002/47/EC on financial collateral arrangements ECON-AM-791082	ECON	25
9 Jul 2026	VAT reverse-charge mechanism ECON-AM-790253	ECON	16
7 Jul 2026	Amending Directives (EU) 2016/2341 and 2016/97 as regards the strengthening of the framework for occupational retirement provision ECON-AM-790235	ECON	18

Show all 103 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group European People’s Party EPP · Centre-right · Christian democracy, conservatism

National delegation

Delegation Germany National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/1917?scope=final&speeches=all&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 26 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Markus FERBER”. Member record. memberId 1917. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/1917?scope=final&speeches=all&vscope=all (retrieved 26 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/1917. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/1917?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-1917,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Markus FERBER}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/1917?scope=final&speeches=all&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/1917?scope=final&speeches=all&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 1917. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/1917. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within EPP

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 9

Amendments tabled in committee, 103

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928