Skip to content

Member

Daniel BUDA

EPP · Romania

Group
EPP PPE
Country
Romania
Roll-call participation
93.5 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
98.4 %ⓘ of 580 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 95.6 %
More facts (5)
National party
PNL Partidul Naţional Liberal
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
2 of 545 votesⓘ
Committees
AGRI (vice-chair), ENVI (substitute), JURI (substitute), REGI
Member id
125012
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

93.5 %

580 of 620 final votes while in office

EPP median: 90.6 % (+3.0 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

98.4 %

571 of 580 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 95.6 % (+2.9 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

0.4 %

2 of 545 votes where their group had a clear line

2 opposite (for ↔ against), 0 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

0.5 %

3 of 580 votes cast

Participation 93.5 % — EPP median 90.6 %, 192 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 192 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Daniel BUDA93.5 %
EPP median90.6 %
Lowest in the group18.4 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members192
With majority line 98.4 % — EPP median 95.6 %, 192 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 192 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Daniel BUDA98.4 %
EPP median95.6 %
Lowest in the group67.8 %
Highest in the group99.0 %
Members192
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
16 Jun 2026Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Amendment 8 to recital AJ 221 for, 426 against, 21 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Amendment 7, adding text after recital AI 218 for, 419 against, 30 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Recital AC — part 2 442 for, 178 against, 46 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Separate vote on recital U 419 for, 226 against, 20 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Amendment 6 to recital Q 236 for, 425 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Recital G — part 2 438 for, 182 against, 50 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 33 244 for, 410 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 25 222 for, 429 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 18 431 for, 223 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Paragraph 15 — part 2 253 for, 165 against, 214 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
16 Jun 2026Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Amendment 10 to paragraph 15 234 for, 423 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Paragraph 11 — part 2 455 for, 211 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 1 224 for, 404 against, 31 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countries Amendment 1 150 for, 474 against, 47 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026Role of trade in strengthening the EU’s economic security Final vote on the motion for a resolutionAdopted 415 for, 105 against, 142 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026Countering transnational repression – towards an EU strategy to protect Europe’s sovereignty and democratic values Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 434 for, 128 against, 104 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026Countering transnational repression – towards an EU strategy to protect Europe’s sovereignty and democratic values Separate vote on paragraph 41 336 for, 288 against, 43 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026Countering transnational repression – towards an EU strategy to protect Europe’s sovereignty and democratic values Amendment 2 to paragraph 7 201 for, 462 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 426 for, 140 against, 107 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded Amendment 3, adding text after recital A 202 for, 461 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded Amendment 2 to recital A 191 for, 467 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded Separate vote on paragraph 22 462 for, 128 against, 82 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded Amendment 8 to paragraph 22 160 for, 464 against, 46 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded Separate vote on paragraph 21 510 for, 148 against, 13 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 20 202 for, 463 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 20 202 for, 465 against, 2 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded Separate vote on paragraph 20 480 for, 152 against, 34 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded Amendment 14 to paragraph 20 145 for, 519 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 5 79 for, 557 against, 26 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 4 211 for, 453 against, 2 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 4 211 for, 440 against, 2 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers following an application from Belgium – EGF/2025/009 BE/Soliver Final vote — text as a wholePassed 602 for, 47 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026Measures necessary for the implementation of the Protocol, annexed to the TEU and to the TFEU, on the financial consequences of the expiry of the ECSC Treaty and on the Research Fund for Coal and Steel Final vote on the draft Council decisionConsent given 563 for, 44 against, 56 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 560 for, 75 against, 25 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 423 for, 57 against, 174 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Proposal to vote on amendments 135 for, 468 against, 51 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Jun 2026Non-application of customs duties on imports of certain goods Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 444 for, 152 against, 54 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 440 for, 151 against, 50 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Jun 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Proposal to vote on amendments 120 for, 509 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
15 Jun 2026Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the Renew Group – Middle East Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the Renew Group — Middle East 336 for, 86 against, 11 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
15 Jun 2026Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the S&D Group – AI Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the S&D Group — AI 244 for, 179 against, 15 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
21 May 2026The need to reduce work-related fatalities Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 395 for, 12 against, 41 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
21 May 2026The need to reduce work-related fatalities Amendments 1 + 2 (voted as one) to recital F 243 for, 211 against, 19 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
21 May 2026The need to reduce work-related fatalities Amendment 10, adding text after recital E 87 for, 353 against, 32 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
21 May 2026The need to reduce work-related fatalities Amendment 4, adding text after recital B 164 for, 288 against, 19 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
21 May 2026The need to reduce work-related fatalities Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 21 160 for, 300 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
21 May 2026The need to reduce work-related fatalities Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 21 167 for, 294 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
21 May 2026The need to reduce work-related fatalities Paragraph 18 — part 3 313 for, 94 against, 58 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
21 May 2026The need to reduce work-related fatalities Paragraph 18 — part 2 303 for, 165 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
21 May 2026The need to reduce work-related fatalities Paragraph 18 — part 1 323 for, 97 against, 55 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 8 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Manfred WEBER EPPGermany98 % of 4 319 shared89 %
Gheorghe FALCĂ EPPRomania97 % of 4 796 shared89 %
Mircea-Gheorghe HAVA EPPRomania97 % of 4 271 shared89 %
Siegfried MUREŞAN EPPRomania97 % of 5 286 shared89 %
Virgil-Daniel POPESCU EPPRomania97 % of 4 982 shared89 %
Sven SIMON EPPGermany97 % of 4 421 shared89 %
Pekka TOVERI EPPFinland97 % of 4 869 shared89 %
Rasa JUKNEVIČIENĖ EPPLithuania97 % of 4 487 shared89 %
Alexandra MEHNERT EPPGermany97 % of 4 934 shared89 %
Sandra KALNIETE EPPLatvia97 % of 5 058 shared89 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Urmas PAET RenewEstonia88 % of 4 914 shared82 %
Dan BARNA RenewRomania88 % of 4 799 shared82 %
Eugen TOMAC RenewRomania87 % of 3 981 shared82 %
Hilde VAUTMANS RenewBelgium87 % of 5 353 shared82 %
Ivars IJABS RenewLatvia87 % of 4 174 shared82 %
Olivier CHASTEL RenewBelgium86 % of 4 952 shared82 %
Katri KULMUNI RenewFinland86 % of 4 372 shared82 %
Elsi KATAINEN RenewFinland86 % of 5 380 shared82 %
Sophie WILMÈS RenewBelgium86 % of 3 847 shared82 %
Jeannette BALJEU RenewNetherlands86 % of 4 790 shared82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Agriculture and Rural DevelopmentAGRI CommitteeVice-chair23 Jul 2024now
Committee on the Environment, Climate and Food SafetyENVI CommitteeSubstitute20 Jan 2025now
Committee on Legal AffairsJURI CommitteeSubstitute25 Nov 2024now
Committee on Regional DevelopmentREGI CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Special Committee on the Housing Crisis in the European UnionHOUS Special committeeSubstitute23 Jan 2025now
Delegation to the EU-Türkiye Joint Parliamentary CommitteeD-TR Joint parliamentary committeeMember24 Oct 2024now
Delegation for relations with IsraelD-IL DelegationSubstitute24 Oct 2024now
Delegation to the OACPS-EU Joint Parliamentary AssemblyDACP Parliamentary assemblyMember19 Sept 2024now
Delegation to the Pacific-EU Parliamentary AssemblyDPAC Parliamentary assemblyMember19 Sept 2024now
Intergroup on Biodiversity, Hunting and CountrysideIG10-04 Intergroup / working groupMember4 Feb 2025now

Show all 15 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
No dossier namedOfficial delegationAGRI8 Jun 2026
Conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Council of Europe Convention on the protection of the environment through criminal lawShadow rapporteurJURI25 Apr 2026
No dossier namedOfficial delegationHOUS6 Mar 2026
No dossier namedShadow rapporteur for an opinionAGRI17 Jan 2026
Amending Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 as regards the school fruit, vegetables and milk scheme (‘EU school scheme’), sectoral interventions, the creation of a protein sector, requirements for hemp, the possibility for marketing standards for cheese, protein crops and meat, application of additional import duties, rules on the availability of supplies in time of emergencies and severe crisis and securitiesShadow rapporteurAGRI15 Jan 2026
Establishing the European Fund for Regional Development including for European Territorial Cooperation (Interreg) and the Cohesion Fund as part of the Fund set out in Regulation (EU) […]  [NRP] and establishing conditions for the implementation of the Union support to regional development from 2028 to 2034Shadow rapporteur for an opinionENVI5 Jan 2026
No dossier namedShadow rapporteur for an opinionREGI2 Dec 2025
Establishing the European Fund for Regional Development including for European Territorial Cooperation (Interreg) and the Cohesion Fund as part of the Fund set out in Regulation (EU) […]  [NRP] and establishing conditions for the implementation of the Union support to regional development from 2028 to 2034Shadow rapporteur for an opinionENVI2 Dec 2025
No dossier namedOfficial delegationREGI20 Oct 2025
No dossier namedOfficial delegationAGRI20 Aug 2025

Show all 17 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

59 contributions recorded, 12 written statements; 1 on behalf of their group; 63 minutes of speaking time.

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 99

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
14 Sept 2026Circular Economy Act: regulatory barriers to secondary raw materials E-10-2026-003654Written questionwith 29 co-authorsNot yet answered
1 Jul 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Commission delegated regulation (EU) of 27 March 2026 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/688 as regards infection with bluetongue virus (serotypes 1-24) and infection with epizootic haemorrhagic disease virus and introducing a derogation for movements of registered equine animals B-10-2026-0342Motion for a resolutionwith 40 co-authors—
29 Jun 2026An updated regulatory framework for wool O-10-2026-000030Oral questionwith 2 co-authorsNot yet answered
15 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland B-10-2026-0304Motion for a resolutionwith 32 co-authors—
14 Jun 2026Compensation for additional costs resulting from new animal transport rules E-10-2026-002447Written question21 Aug 2026
14 Jun 2026An integrated European approach to water security in agriculture E-10-2026-002444Written question24 Jul 2026
14 Jun 2026Creation of a European rapid response mechanism to restore productive capacity following natural disasters E-10-2026-002446Written question5 Aug 2026
14 Jun 2026Supporting European production of essential agricultural inputs and reducing external dependencies E-10-2026-002441Written question6 Aug 2026
14 Jun 2026Rebuilding local agri-food processing capacities in vulnerable regions E-10-2026-002443Written question5 Aug 2026
14 Jun 2026European framework for payments to farmers who provide measurable ecosystem services E-10-2026-002445Written questionwith 1 co-author28 Aug 2026

Show all 99 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 225

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
16 Sept 2026Establishing the European Fund for Regional Development including for European Territorial Cooperation (Interreg) and the Cohesion Fund as part of the Fund set out in Regulation (EU) […] [NRP] and establishing conditions for the implementation of the Union support to regional development from 2028 to 2034 REGI-AM-792057 REGI12
11 Sept 2026Amendments to the Decision of the European Parliament of 28 September 2005 adopting the Statute for Members of the European Parliament, regarding proxy voting JURI-AM-792153 JURI12
7 Sept 2026Establishing the European Fund for Regional Development including for European Territorial Cooperation (Interreg) and the Cohesion Fund as part of the Fund set out in Regulation (EU) […] [NRP] and establishing conditions for the implementation of the Union support to regional development from 2028 to 2034 REGI-AM-792058 REGI21
27 Aug 2026Cohesion policy in the EU’s eastern border regions: strengthening territorial resilience and cross-border cooperation REGI-AM-791869 REGI34
28 Jul 2026Amending Directives 2008/98/EC, 2010/75/EU, (EU) 2015/2193 and (EU) 2024/1785 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards simplification of some requirements and reduction of administrative burden ENVI-AM-791123 ENVI13
23 Jul 2026Cohesion policy – the driving force in implementing the EU agenda for cities REGI-AM-791875 REGI23
23 Jul 2026Cohesion policy – the driving force in implementing the EU agenda for cities REGI-AM-791872 REGI20
23 Jul 2026Cohesion policy in the EU’s eastern border regions: strengthening territorial resilienceand cross-border cooperation REGI-AM-791870 REGI5
22 Jul 2026The 28th regime corporate legal framework – 'EU Inc.' JURI-AM-791128 JURI19
22 Jul 2026The 28th regime corporate legal framework – 'EU Inc.' JURI-AM-791130 JURI42

Show all 225 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Romania National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
26 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Daniel BUDA”. Member record. memberId 125012. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/125012?page=18&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 26 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/125012. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/125012?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-125012,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Daniel BUDA}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/125012?page=18&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/125012?page=18&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 125012. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/125012. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}