Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Member · Former member

Anders VISTISEN

Patriots · Denmark · left on 13 April 2026

Group
Patriots PfE
Country
Denmark
Roll-call participation
85.5 %ⓘ of 4 245 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.2 % · whole term, roll calls
With majority line
84.2 %ⓘ of 3 621 votes where the group had a line · Patriots median 82.7 %
More facts (4)
National party
O Dansk Folkeparti
In office
16 Jul 2024 – 13 Apr 2026 (left on 13 April 2026)
Against clear line
263 of 2 867 votesⓘ
Member id
124875
More
Cite this page EP profile (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term2024 (from July)20252026
Custom dates
Votes Final votes620All roll calls5 928

Roll-call participation ⓘ

85.5 %

3 631 of 4 245 roll calls while in office

Patriots median: 91.1 % (−5.6 pts)

Chamber median: 90.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

84.2 %

3 048 of 3 621 votes where their group had a line

Patriots median: 82.7 % (+1.5 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

9.2 %

263 of 2 867 votes where their group had a clear line

115 opposite (for ↔ against), 128 abstained against the line, 20 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

11.8 %

428 of 3 631 votes cast

Participation 85.5 % — Patriots median 91.1 %, 89 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 89 members of the Patriots with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Anders VISTISEN85.5 %
Patriots median91.1 %
Lowest in the group44.5 %
Highest in the group99.9 %
Members89
With majority line 84.2 % — Patriots median 82.7 %, 89 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 89 members of the Patriots with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Anders VISTISEN84.2 %
Patriots median82.7 %
Lowest in the group72.5 %
Highest in the group92.9 %
Members89
  • Whole term, 5 928 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of Patriots; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 4 245

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votesAll roll calls
Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
26 Mar 2026Global Gateway – past impacts and future orientation Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 371 for, 146 against, 80 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers: application EGF/2025/007 BE/Casa - Belgium Final vote on the motion for a resolutionPassed 575 for, 48 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against ≠ groupMajority line: For
26 Mar 2026Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers: application EGF/2025/005 AT/KTM - Austria Final vote on the motion for a resolutionPassed 584 for, 39 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against ≠ groupMajority line: For
26 Mar 2026EU-China Agreement: modification of concessions on all the tariff rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV Final vote on the draft Council decisionConsent given 603 for, 3 against, 33 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026United Nations Convention on the International Effects of Judicial Sales of Ships Final vote on the draft Council decisionConsent given 605 for, 3 against, 9 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026EU-Lebanon Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation setting, participation of Lebanon in the Partnership for Research and Innovation in the Mediterranean Area (PRIMA) Final vote on the draft Council decisionConsent given 618 for, 6 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Final votePassed 569 for, 45 against, 23 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 89 to Article 1 189 for, 438 against, 6 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 102 to Article 1 195 for, 439 against, 1 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 107 to Article 1 66 for, 552 against, 18 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 101 to Article 1 196 for, 431 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 106 to Article 1 67 for, 540 against, 33 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 108 to Article 1 195 for, 433 against, 9 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 105 to Article 1 76 for, 542 against, 15 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 100 to Article 1 196 for, 433 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 99 to Article 1 203 for, 426 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 98 to Article 1 199 for, 436 against, 2 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 97 to Article 1 197 for, 433 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 60 to Article 1 — part 4 464 for, 161 against, 13 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 96 to Article 1 189 for, 443 against, 6 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 88 to Article 1 195 for, 443 against, 0 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 95 to Article 1 216 for, 412 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 87 to Article 1 — part 2 112 for, 479 against, 38 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 87 to Article 1 — part 1 206 for, 427 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 94 to Article 1 195 for, 430 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 36 to Article 1 444 for, 176 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 32 to Article 1 518 for, 97 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against ≠ groupMajority line: For
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 103 to Article 1 90 for, 522 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 31 to Article 1 544 for, 75 against, 20 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 92 to Article 1 220 for, 406 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 84 to Article 1 199 for, 431 against, 3 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 91 to Article 1 214 for, 408 against, 13 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 90 to Article 1 162 for, 406 against, 57 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: Abstained
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 82 541 for, 81 against, 15 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 81 548 for, 74 against, 13 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) Amendment 11 471 for, 161 against, 2 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Non-application of customs duties on imports of certain goods Final votePassed 437 for, 144 against, 60 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Non-application of customs duties on imports of certain goods Proposal to reject the text 159 for, 458 against, 23 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Non-application of customs duties on imports of certain goods Motion for adjournment of vote 174 for, 450 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Final votePassed 417 for, 154 against, 71 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Amendment 60, adding text after recital 9 118 for, 422 against, 88 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Amendment 59, adding text after recital 9 117 for, 414 against, 97 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Amendment 58, adding text after recital 4 117 for, 414 against, 101 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Amendment 57, adding text after recital 4 158 for, 401 against, 75 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Amendment 56, adding text after recital 3 132 for, 434 against, 73 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Amendment 55, adding text after recital 2 142 for, 427 against, 55 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Amendment 54, adding text after recital 2 104 for, 456 against, 67 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Amendment 53, adding text after recital 2 62 for, 536 against, 41 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Amendment 52, adding text after recital 2 56 for, 530 against, 52 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
26 Mar 2026Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America Amendment 51, adding text after recital 2 110 for, 466 against, 58 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 9 of 87 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table
Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
SittingRoll callsVoted in
17 Jul 20242320
18 Jul 202411
16 Sept 202422
18 Sept 202422
19 Sept 20249291
7 Oct 202421
8 Oct 202411
9 Oct 20241818
10 Oct 202444
21 Oct 202422
22 Oct 20241010
23 Oct 20241290
24 Oct 2024130
13 Nov 202422
14 Nov 20243636
25 Nov 202422
26 Nov 20241818
27 Nov 20241111
28 Nov 20245755
17 Dec 20241313
18 Dec 20243333
19 Dec 20244544
20 Jan 202520
21 Jan 202511
22 Jan 202522
23 Jan 20254545
10 Feb 202511
11 Feb 20253232
12 Feb 20251010
13 Feb 20253030
10 Mar 202522
11 Mar 202599
12 Mar 2025228225
13 Mar 20252424
31 Mar 202533
1 Apr 20253535
2 Apr 2025251251
3 Apr 20256260
5 May 202555
6 May 20251010
7 May 2025220218
8 May 2025103103
21 May 202522
22 May 20255352
16 Jun 202522
17 Jun 20254141
18 Jun 20259190
19 Jun 20258787
7 Jul 202510
8 Jul 20255554
9 Jul 202513418
10 Jul 2025360
8 Sept 202511
9 Sept 2025101101
10 Sept 20253434
11 Sept 20256969
6 Oct 202522
7 Oct 202555
8 Oct 20255555
9 Oct 20256565
20 Oct 202533
21 Oct 20251313
22 Oct 20251860
23 Oct 2025550
13 Nov 2025267267
24 Nov 202533
25 Nov 20257575
26 Nov 202510098
27 Nov 2025125125
15 Dec 202544
16 Dec 20256666
17 Dec 20254343
18 Dec 20254242
20 Jan 20266767
21 Jan 2026112112
22 Jan 20265858
9 Feb 202622
10 Feb 20263838
11 Feb 20261313
12 Feb 2026141138
24 Feb 20264342
9 Mar 202610
10 Mar 2026197195
11 Mar 20266046
12 Mar 2026340
25 Mar 202633
26 Mar 20266968

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Patriots

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
António TÂNGER CORRÊA PatriotsPortugal89 % of 3 112 shared74 %
Vilis KRIŠTOPANS PatriotsLatvia87 % of 3 293 shared74 %
Tiago MOREIRA DE SÁ PatriotsPortugal86 % of 3 445 shared74 %
Afroditi LATINOPOULOU PatriotsGreece86 % of 2 832 shared74 %
Anna BRYŁKA changed group PatriotsPoland84 % of 3 155 shared74 %
Tomasz BUCZEK changed group PatriotsPoland84 % of 3 173 shared74 %
Antonín STANĚK PatriotsCzechia82 % of 1 510 shared74 %
Tom VANDENDRIESSCHE PatriotsBelgium80 % of 3 568 shared74 %
Hermann TERTSCH PatriotsSpain80 % of 2 813 shared74 %
Marie DAUCHY PatriotsFrance80 % of 2 581 shared74 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Guillaume PELTIER ECRFrance77 % of 3 106 shared68 %
Laurence TROCHU ECRFrance76 % of 3 429 shared68 %
Marion MARÉCHAL ECRFrance76 % of 2 954 shared68 %
Sarah KNAFO ESNFrance75 % of 2 592 shared70 %
Nicolas BAY ECRFrance75 % of 3 276 shared68 %
Volker SCHNURRBUSCH changed group ESNGermany74 % of 2 500 shared68 %
Marc JONGEN ESNGermany73 % of 3 026 shared70 %
René AUST ESNGermany73 % of 3 259 shared70 %
Anja ARNDT ESNGermany72 % of 3 007 shared70 %
Alexander JUNGBLUTH ESNGermany72 % of 3 589 shared70 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Dossiers

No rapporteur, shadow or negotiator role recorded this term.

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

45 contributions recorded; 5 on behalf of their group; 60 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
25 Mar 2026Energy security, independence and supply in the geopolitical context - ensuring market stability and affordable energy for industry and citizens (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
25 Mar 2026Energy security, independence and supply in the geopolitical context - ensuring market stability and affordable energy for industry and citizens (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
10 Mar 2026EU enlargement strategy (debate) Speech · 2 minRead
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
22 Jan 2026Drones and new systems of warfare – the EU’s need to adapt to be fit for today’s security challenges (debate) Speech · 2 minRead
21 Jan 2026Restoring control of migration: returns, visa policy and third-country cooperation (topical debate) Speech · 2 minRead
20 Jan 2026Territorial integrity and sovereignty of Greenland and the Kingdom of Denmark: the need for a united EU response to US blackmail attempts (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
20 Jan 2026Territorial integrity and sovereignty of Greenland and the Kingdom of Denmark: the need for a united EU response to US blackmail attempts (debate) Speech · 1 minRead

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 26

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
3 Mar 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on halting the expansion of mosques and Islamic centres in the EU B-10-2026-0154Motion for a resolutionwith 37 co-authors—
23 Feb 2026Peter Mandelson and Jeffrey Epstein E-10-2026-000742Written question10 Jun 2026
14 Jan 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION seeking an opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part, and the proposed Interim Agreement on Trade between the European Union, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part B-10-2026-0061Motion for a resolutionwith 101 co-authors—
14 Jan 2026MOTION OF CENSURE ON THE COMMISSION MOTION OF CENSURE ON THE COMMISSION B-10-2026-0063Motion for a resolutionwith 109 co-authors—
19 Nov 2025Protecting citizens’ right to make cash payments and ensuring financial inclusion O-10-2025-000042Oral questionwith 40 co-authorsNot yet answered
12 Nov 2025Upholding the EU institutions’ integrity in the face of networks with links to Hamas E-10-2025-004481Written questionwith 20 co-authors18 Mar 2026
14 Oct 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on declaring Antifa a terrorist organisation B-10-2025-0447Motion for a resolutionwith 79 co-authors—
12 Sept 2025MOTION OF CENSURE ON THE COMMISSION MOTION OF CENSURE ON THE COMMISSION B-10-2025-0400Motion for a resolutionwith 84 co-authors—
4 Sept 2025Transparency of the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority E-10-2025-003426Written question17 Nov 2025
1 Sept 2025Grooming expenses for European Commissioners E-10-2025-003348Written question27 Nov 2025
10 Jul 2025Requiring taxi drivers to take breaks despite proven periods of downtime without customers E-10-2025-002813Written question5 Sept 2025
7 Jul 2025The common agricultural policy enables animal cruelty E-10-2025-002757Written question18 Sept 2025
25 Jun 2025The Commission’s role in ensuring legal certainty, consistency and balance between security and investment in Member States’ FDI screening E-10-2025-002558Written question18 Aug 2025
12 Feb 2025Adoption of the ReFuelEU Aviation Act and the economic impact of mandatory minimum sustainable aviation fuel quotas in the air transport sector E-10-2025-000653Written questionwith 41 co-authors1 Apr 2025
11 Feb 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on implementing a mass return strategy to expel illegal migrants B-10-2025-0137Motion for a resolutionwith 36 co-authors—
6 Feb 2025Unknown chemical status E-10-2025-000558Written question2 Apr 2025
29 Jan 2025The Commission’s response to the United States’ withdrawal from the Paris Agreement E-10-2025-000403Written questionwith 36 co-authors24 Mar 2025
29 Jan 2025Lack of transparency, misuse of public funds and assurance of sound management in European institutions E-10-2025-000405Written questionwith 38 co-authors25 Mar 2025
2 Dec 2024VAT on artists’ rights and the EU’s requirements for Denmark E-10-2024-002722Written question28 Feb 2025
30 Nov 2024EU state aid rules and applying them to tax exemptions for non-profit bingo games E-10-2024-002706Written question10 Mar 2025
29 Nov 2024Failure to acknowledge vaccine-related harm is creating stigmatisation – urgent need for EU action to ensure research and support for those affected E-10-2024-002698Written questionNot yet answered
22 Nov 2024MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the victory of president-elect Donald Trump B-10-2024-0185Motion for a resolutionwith 44 co-authors—
12 Nov 2024The Commission’s plans to include the revision of the outstanding proposals on animal welfare in its work plan for 2025 O-10-2024-000014Oral questionwith 37 co-authorsNot yet answered
10 Oct 2024MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on enabling Member States to opt-out of EU migration policy B-10-2024-0119Motion for a resolutionwith 56 co-authors—
16 Sept 2024MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Venezuela B-10-2024-0027Motion for a resolutionwith 9 co-authors—
17 Jul 2024MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the need for the EU’s continuous support for Ukraine B-10-2024-0008Motion for a resolutionwith 2 co-authors—

Amendments tabled in committee, 1

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
5 Feb 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions FEMM-AM-782486 FEMM32

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Denmark National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/124875?docs=all&vscope=all
Official source
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Anders VISTISEN”. Member record. memberId 124875. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/124875?docs=all&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/124875. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/124875?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-member-124875,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Anders VISTISEN}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/124875?docs=all&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/124875?docs=all&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 124875. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/124875. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}