Skip to content

Decision

United Nations Convention on the International Effects of Judicial Sales of Ships

Effect
Consent given
Result
605 for · 3 against · 9 abstained roll call
Date
26 March 2026, 11:38
Kind
International agreement · Consent procedure
More facts (8)
Margin
by an overwhelming majority
Source
Committee report by Ton Diepeveen
Topics
Foreign affairsTransport & tourism Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes
1 vote · 1 roll call
Final vote
189250
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 605 for, 3 against, 9 abstained (roll call).

Consent given by an overwhelming majority.

Parliament gave its consent.

Backed by The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew, EPP, ECR, Patriots and ESN.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 21Against 0Abst. 3No vote 22 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.81
GreensFor 45Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 101Against 0Abst. 1No vote 33 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 68Against 1Abst. 0No vote 8 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 167Against 0Abst. 0No vote 17 of 184Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 74Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 83Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 23Against 0Abst. 4No vote 0 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.78
No groupFor 23Against 2Abst. 1No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 9

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria190011.00
Belgium190031.00
Bulgaria150021.00
Cyprus5001—
Czechia210001.00
Germany851090.98
Denmark150001.00
Estonia7000—
Spain490290.94
Finland130021.00
France5801220.97
Greece151050.91
Croatia100021.00
Hungary1100101.00
Ireland8015—
Italy680081.00
Lithuania9002—
Luxembourg4101—
Latvia8001—
Malta5001—
Netherlands300011.00
Poland460250.94
Portugal190021.00
Romania290130.95
Sweden180031.00
Slovenia8001—
Slovakia110220.77

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 617 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. Speeches: how many times they took the floor. Final vote: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Roberta METSOLA MaltaEPPSpeeches126 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded

All votes on this decision, 1

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Final vote on the draft Council decision A10-0049/2026 – Ton Diepeveen – Draft Council decision Roll call605 for, 3 against, 9 abstained Adopted

Text

The text voted on.

Report A-10-2026-0049

AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament consented to the EU concluding the UN Convention on the International Effects of Judicial Sales of Ships, which harmonises the legal effects of court-ordered ship sales across countries.

The Convention ensures that a judicial sale conferring full title is recognised in all contracting states, requiring deregistration or transfer of the ship's registration and prohibiting seizure for pre-existing claims.

The rapporteur raised concerns about national sovereignty, creditor protection, and potential regulation shopping, suggesting possible safeguards such as exceptions for public interest and review mechanisms.

Read the text · Report a problem

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament gives its consent to the Council decision concluding the United Nations Convention on the International Effects of Judicial Sales of Ships, which harmonizes the international effects of court-ordered ship sales.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2025/0233(NLE) · Non-legislative procedure

Completed: published in the Official Journal on 18 May 2026 and now EU law.

Show the 5 steps of the dossier
  1. Referred to committee · 18 December 2025 (done)
  2. Committee work · Report adopted 24 February 2026 (done)
  3. Tabled for plenary · 10 March 2026 (done)
  4. Plenary vote · Adopted 26 March 2026 (done)
  5. Adopted by the Council · 18 May 2026 (done)

Lead committee: JURI · Rapporteur: Ton DIEPEVEEN (Patriots)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 3 connections: Other decisions of the part-session on JURI dossiers

Other decisions of the part-session on JURI dossiers

See all: Other decisions of the part-session on JURI dossiers

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “United Nations Convention on the International Effects of Judicial Sales of Ships”. Decision, 26 March 2026. votingId 189250, document A-10-2026-0049, reference 2025/0233(NLE). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-03-26/11 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 26 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-26-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 26 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-26-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-26, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-26/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2026-03-26-11,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{United Nations Convention on the International Effects of Judicial Sales of Ships}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-26},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-03-26/11}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-03-26/11},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 189250, document A-10-2026-0049, reference 2025/0233(NLE). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-26-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-26-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-26 (CC BY 4.0)}
}