Skip to content

Member

Tonino PICULA

S&D · Croatia

Group
S&D
Country
Croatia
Roll-call participation
96.0 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
98.0 %ⓘ of 595 votes where the group had a line · S&D median 97.1 %
More facts (5)
National party
SDP Socijaldemokratska partija Hrvatske
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
8 of 588 votesⓘ
Committees
AFET, SEDE (substitute)
Member id
112744
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

96.0 %

595 of 620 final votes while in office

S&D median: 89.5 % (+6.5 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

98.0 %

583 of 595 votes where their group had a line

S&D median: 97.1 % (+0.9 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

1.4 %

8 of 588 votes where their group had a clear line

4 opposite (for ↔ against), 4 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

1.5 %

9 of 595 votes cast

Participation 96.0 % — S&D median 89.5 %, 137 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 137 members of the S&D with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Tonino PICULA96.0 %
S&D median89.5 %
Lowest in the group48.1 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members137
With majority line 98.0 % — S&D median 97.1 %, 137 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 137 members of the S&D with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Tonino PICULA98.0 %
S&D median97.1 %
Lowest in the group86.7 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members137
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of S&D; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Separate vote on citation 47 356 for, 188 against, 57 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 56, adding text after paragraph 57 111 for, 491 against, 18 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 57 — part 2 524 for, 75 against, 13 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 57 — part 1 550 for, 49 against, 20 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 55 to paragraph 57 125 for, 485 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 55 — part 2 432 for, 137 against, 41 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 60 to paragraph 55 99 for, 505 against, 17 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 54 to paragraph 55 150 for, 438 against, 33 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 53 — part 2 480 for, 111 against, 24 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 61 to paragraph 53 281 for, 306 against, 31 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 52 127 for, 472 against, 17 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 87 to paragraph 52 106 for, 489 against, 18 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 106, adding text after paragraph 50 — part 2 323 for, 247 against, 41 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 106, adding text after paragraph 50 — part 1 529 for, 72 against, 19 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 105, adding text after paragraph 49 405 for, 154 against, 62 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 86, adding text after paragraph 48 147 for, 445 against, 23 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 85, adding text after paragraph 48 154 for, 438 against, 25 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 20, adding text after paragraph 48 127 for, 493 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 48 — part 10 474 for, 123 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 48 — part 9 450 for, 138 against, 25 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 48 — part 8 475 for, 134 against, 17 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 48 — part 7 532 for, 60 against, 21 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 48 — part 6 549 for, 35 against, 29 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 48 — part 5 469 for, 129 against, 13 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 48 — part 4 485 for, 106 against, 15 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 48 — part 3 514 for, 84 against, 17 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 48 — part 2 458 for, 140 against, 18 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 48 — part 1 506 for, 106 against, 9 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 51 to paragraph 48 105 for, 494 against, 18 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 47 — part 3 452 for, 151 against, 18 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 46 147 for, 466 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 45 150 for, 446 against, 21 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 45 — part 3 359 for, 230 against, 26 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 49 to paragraph 43 137 for, 458 against, 22 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 84 to paragraph 43 120 for, 480 against, 24 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 42 126 for, 474 against, 22 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 42 71 for, 507 against, 46 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 42 — part 3 454 for, 141 against, 24 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 42 — part 2 447 for, 128 against, 48 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 48, adding text after paragraph 41 115 for, 485 against, 18 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 47, adding text after paragraph 41 114 for, 494 against, 20 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 41 — part 6 480 for, 132 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 41 — part 5 453 for, 147 against, 21 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 46 to paragraph 41 99 for, 516 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 40 — part 4 542 for, 43 against, 36 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 82 to paragraph 40 142 for, 461 against, 24 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 44, adding text after paragraph 39 139 for, 455 against, 27 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 43 to paragraph 39 91 for, 483 against, 48 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 81 to paragraph 39 128 for, 477 against, 20 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 42, adding text after paragraph 37 91 for, 506 against, 23 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 1 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within S&D

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Romana JERKOVIĆ S&DCroatia96 % of 4 616 shared93 %
Biljana BORZAN S&DCroatia96 % of 5 356 shared93 %
Marko VEŠLIGAJ S&DCroatia95 % of 4 450 shared93 %
José CEPEDA S&DSpain94 % of 4 950 shared93 %
Lina GÁLVEZ S&DSpain94 % of 4 793 shared93 %
Alicia HOMS GINEL S&DSpain94 % of 4 942 shared93 %
Laura BALLARÍN CEREZA S&DSpain94 % of 3 987 shared93 %
Sandro RUOTOLO S&DItaly93 % of 4 344 shared93 %
Vilija BLINKEVIČIŪTĖ S&DLithuania93 % of 5 435 shared93 %
Isilda GOMES S&DPortugal93 % of 5 105 shared93 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Jana TOOM RenewEstonia87 % of 4 979 shared86 %
Pascal CANFIN RenewFrance86 % of 5 175 shared86 %
Irena JOVEVA RenewSlovenia86 % of 5 437 shared86 %
Lukas SIEPER changed group RenewGermany86 % of 5 326 shared49 %
Gerben-Jan GERBRANDY RenewNetherlands86 % of 5 679 shared86 %
Ľubica KARVAŠOVÁ RenewSlovakia86 % of 3 804 shared86 %
Raquel GARCÍA HERMIDA-VAN DER WALLE RenewNetherlands86 % of 5 741 shared86 %
Valérie HAYER RenewFrance86 % of 5 490 shared86 %
Brigitte VAN DEN BERG RenewNetherlands86 % of 4 919 shared86 %
Ľudovít ÓDOR RenewSlovakia86 % of 5 423 shared86 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Foreign AffairsAFET CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Security and DefenceSEDE CommitteeSubstitute23 Jan 2025now
Delegation to the EU-Montenegro Stabilisation and Association Parliamentary CommitteeD-ME Joint parliamentary committeeSubstitute3 Apr 2025now
Delegation to the EU-Serbia Stabilisation and Association Parliamentary CommitteeD-RS Joint parliamentary committeeSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation to the EU-Russia Parliamentary Cooperation CommitteeD-RU DelegationSubstitute22 Sept 2026now
Delegation for relations with the United StatesD-US DelegationMember19 Sept 2024now
Intergroup on Seas, Rivers, Islands and Coastal Areas (SEARICA)IG10-20 Intergroup / working groupVice-chair4 Feb 2025now
Intergroup on the Welfare and Conservation of AnimalsIG10-27 Intergroup / working groupMember8 Jan 2025now
Subcommittee on Security and DefenceSEDE SubcommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 202419 Jan 2025

Show all 9 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
92nd EU-US inter-parliamentary meeting of the Transatlantic Legislators’ Dialogue, 25-26 August 2026, San Francisco, USAOfficial delegationD-US14 Jul 2026
Establishing the Programme for agile and rapid defence innovation (AGILE)RapporteurSEDE19 May 2026
No dossier namedOfficial delegationAFET22 Apr 2026
No dossier namedOfficial delegationAFET10 Feb 2026
No dossier namedOfficial delegationAFET28 Jan 2026
No dossier namedOfficial delegationAFET17 Dec 2025
No dossier namedOfficial delegationAFET10 Dec 2025
No dossier namedOfficial delegationSEDE7 Oct 2025
Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025Shadow rapporteurAFET23 Sept 2025
EU enlargement strategyShadow rapporteurAFET23 Sept 2025

Show all 20 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

48 contributions recorded; 7 on behalf of their group; 68 minutes of speaking time.

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 8

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
17 Jun 2026Dynamic pricing for major sporting and cultural events E-10-2026-002518Written questionwith 35 co-authors15 Sept 2026
3 Mar 2026Visa requirement imposed by Nicaragua on certain EU citizens and application of the reciprocity mechanism P-10-2026-000868Priority written questionwith 9 co-authors31 Mar 2026
23 Jan 2026Alleged use of chemical agent on protesters in Georgia in 2024 E-10-2026-000267Written questionwith 19 co-authors1 Apr 2026
17 Oct 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the polarisation and increased repression in Serbia, one year after the Novi Sad tragedy B-10-2025-0459Motion for a resolutionwith 2 co-authors—
10 Dec 2024Rule of law violations in Croatia P-10-2024-002837Priority written questionwith 23 co-authors11 Mar 2025
21 Oct 2024MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the People’s Republic of China’s misinterpretation of the UN resolution 2758 and its continuous military provocations around Taiwan B-10-2024-0137Motion for a resolutionwith 2 co-authors—
17 Sept 2024Recent increase in electricity prices in central and eastern Europe E-10-2024-001736Written questionwith 18 co-authors6 Nov 2024
17 Jul 2024MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the need for the EU’s continuous support for Ukraine B-10-2024-0007Motion for a resolutionwith 50 co-authors—

Show all 8 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 28

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
23 Jun 2026on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790099 CJ711
23 Jun 2026on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790105 CJ711
18 May 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788903 ITRE1
18 May 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788902 ITRE2
18 May 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788900 ITRE2
18 May 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788895 ITRE5
18 May 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788894 ITRE1
18 May 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788892 ITRE1
18 May 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788905 ITRE3
13 May 2026Establishing the Programme for agile and rapid defence innovation (AGILE) CJ55-AM-788873 CJ5522

Show all 28 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Croatia National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
1 October 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Tonino PICULA”. Member record. memberId 112744. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/112744?page=39&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 1 October 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/112744. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/112744?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-112744,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Tonino PICULA}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/112744?page=39&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/112744?page=39&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-10-01},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 112744. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/112744. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}