Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Final vote on the whole text

The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report

Vote
Final vote on the whole text
Decision
No. 25 of the sitting of 29 Apr 2026
Result
387 for · 191 against · 46 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
29 April 2026, 14:58
More facts (6)
Effect
Adopted — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 32 of 32 on the decision
Official label
A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Text
Report A-10-2026-0091
Dossier
2025/2239(INI)
Vote id
190564
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 387 for, 191 against, 46 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 62 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Adopted.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 39Against 0Abst. 1No vote 6 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 41Against 0Abst. 3No vote 9 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.90
S&DFor 107Against 0Abst. 13No vote 15 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.84
RenewFor 63Against 0Abst. 0No vote 14 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 132Against 11Abst. 12No vote 30 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.78
ECRFor 0Against 67Abst. 10No vote 4 of 81Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.81
PatriotsFor 0Against 73Abst. 1No vote 11 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
ESNFor 0Against 26Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 5Against 14Abst. 6No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium100
Germany300
Denmark100
Spain300
Finland300
France800
Greece301
Ireland300
Italy1000
Netherlands100
Portugal100
Sweden200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 624 members

No vote recorded, 95

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 95 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
25 Nov 2025Recital BE — part 3 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSplit vote411 for, 207 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.94 556 voters
25 Nov 2025Recital BD — part 2 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSplit vote416 for, 202 against, 12 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.94 555 voters
25 Nov 2025Recital BE — part 2 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSplit vote408 for, 209 against, 11 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.93 553 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
25 Nov 2025Separate vote on recital BK Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSeparate vote418 for, 190 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.93 559 voters
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Final416 for, 190 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 67 %r · shared0.93 609 voters
25 Nov 2025Recital BJ — part 2 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSplit vote410 for, 190 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.93 554 voters
25 Nov 2025Final vote — text as a whole Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedFinal415 for, 193 against, 28 abstained Adopted For 65 %r · shared0.93 559 voters
16 Jun 2026Paragraph 11 — part 2 Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countriesSplit vote455 for, 211 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Members (a)r · shared0.93 588 voters
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 96 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Separate vote413 for, 197 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.93 599 voters
25 Nov 2025Paragraph 27 — part 1 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSplit vote418 for, 183 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.93 558 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/190564
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Final vote on the whole text — The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report”. Vote, 29 April 2026. votingId 190564, reference 2025/2239(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/190564 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-29/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-04-29-190564,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Final vote on the whole text — The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-29},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/190564}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-04-29/190564},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 190564, reference 2025/2239(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29 (CC BY 4.0)}
}