Skip to content

Decision · Objection under Rule 115(2) and (3) · implementing measure

Genetically modified soybean MON 94637

Effect
Objection passed
Result
412 for · 145 against · 11 abstained roll call
Date
29 April 2026, 15:03
Kind
Objection to a Commission measure
More facts (10)
Margin
by a large majority
Counts are for
the objection
Source
Motion for a resolution
Topics
Agriculture, food & fisheries Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes
1 vote · 1 roll call
Requested by
The Left (1 roll call) · Greens (1 roll call)
Final vote
191320
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 412 for, 145 against, 11 abstained (roll call).

Objection passed by a large majority.

The objection passed. For an implementing measure it is not legally binding: the Commission is asked to withdraw the measure but can still adopt it.

Backed by The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew, ECR, Patriots and ESN; opposed by EPP.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 37Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 39Against 3Abst. 0No vote 11 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.89
S&DFor 102Against 1Abst. 5No vote 27 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.92
RenewFor 30Against 29Abst. 1No vote 17 of 77Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.25
EPPFor 50Against 87Abst. 4No vote 44 of 185Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.43
ECRFor 55Against 13Abst. 0No vote 13 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.71
PatriotsFor 55Against 10Abst. 0No vote 20 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.77
ESNFor 22Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 22Against 2Abst. 1No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 32

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria161030.91
Belgium146020.55
Bulgaria102050.75
Cyprus4002—
Czechia414030.67
Germany46300200.41
Denmark56310.14
Estonia3301—
Spain29180130.43
Finland76020.31
France6311160.95
Greece160051.00
Croatia7005—
Hungary130170.89
Ireland38120.50
Italy5550160.88
Lithuania63110.40
Luxembourg5100—
Latvia5103—
Malta0105—
Netherlands1410070.38
Poland3052160.72
Portugal108120.29
Romania167190.50
Sweden99030.25
Slovenia8001—
Slovakia140011.00

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 568 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. Speeches: how many times they took the floor. Final vote: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Roberta METSOLA MaltaEPPSpeeches129 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded

All votes on this decision, 1

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Final vote on the motion for a resolution B10-0186/2026 – Motion for a resolution Roll call412 for, 145 against, 11 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: The Left, Greens

Roll calls requested by The Left, Greens.

Text

The text voted on.

Motion B-10-2026-0186

AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

The European Parliament adopted a resolution objecting to the Commission's draft decision authorising the placing on the market of products containing genetically modified soybean MON 94637.

The objection blocks the Commission measure, meaning the GM soybean cannot be authorised for sale in the EU.

Parliament calls on the Commission to withdraw its draft decision and to reform the GMO authorisation procedure.

Read the text · Report a problem

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament objects to the Commission's draft decision authorising genetically modified soybean MON 94637, considering it exceeds implementing powers and is inconsistent with EU law.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2026/2651(RSP) · Resolution on a topical subject

Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3) authorising the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of or produced from genetically modified soybean MON 94637 pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council

Parliament adopted the text on 29 April 2026. This is its final position on the matter.

Show the 3 steps of the dossier
  1. Tabled for plenary (done)
  2. Plenary vote · Adopted 29 April 2026 (done)
  3. Parliament’s position · Final (done)

Lead committee: ENVI · Authors: Sirpa PIETIKÄINEN (EPP), Biljana BORZAN (S&D), Martin HÄUSLING (Greens), Anja HAZEKAMP (The Left)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 10 connections: Other decisions of the part-session on ENVI dossiers · Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Other decisions of the part-session on ENVI dossiers

See all: Other decisions of the part-session on ENVI dossiers

Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Genetically modified soybean MON 94637”. Decision, 29 April 2026. votingId 191320, document B-10-2026-0186, reference 2026/2651(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-04-29/23 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-29/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2026-04-29-23,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Genetically modified soybean MON 94637}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-29},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-04-29/23}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-04-29/23},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 191320, document B-10-2026-0186, reference 2026/2651(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29 (CC BY 4.0)}
}