Skip to content

Decision

Establishing an EU talent pool

Effect
Passed
Result
414 for · 182 against · 21 abstained roll call
Date
10 March 2026, 13:14
Kind
New EU law · 1st reading
More facts (9)
Margin
by a large majority
Source
Committee report by Abir Al-Sahlani
Topics
Migration & asylumJobs, social affairs & equality Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes
56 votes · 8 roll calls
Requested by
ECR (1 roll call) · Patriots (1 roll call) · ESN (1 roll call)
Final vote
186921
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 414 for, 182 against, 21 abstained (roll call).

Passed by a large majority.

Parliament adopted its position on the law.

A proposal to reject the whole text was defeated first. Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 50 parts of the text voted on separately (50 lapsed).

Backed by Greens, S&D, Renew and EPP; opposed by ECR, Patriots and ESN; The Left split.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 10Against 14Abst. 14No vote 8 of 46Majority line TieClear line Divided Cohesion 0.05
GreensFor 45Against 0Abst. 1No vote 7 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 107Against 11Abst. 2No vote 15 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.84
RenewFor 62Against 4Abst. 0No vote 10 of 76Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.91
EPPFor 148Against 9Abst. 3No vote 26 of 186Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.89
ECRFor 31Against 41Abst. 0No vote 7 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.35
PatriotsFor 7Against 57Abst. 0No vote 20 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.84
ESNFor 0Against 25Abst. 0No vote 3 of 28Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 4Against 21Abst. 1No vote 5 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 37

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria146000.55
Belgium155110.57
Bulgaria115010.53
Cyprus2121—
Czechia173010.78
Germany61203110.59
Denmark66120.19
Estonia5002—
Spain3860160.80
Finland92400.40
France28341180.31
Greece98130.25
Croatia4107—
Hungary280110.70
Ireland81320.50
Italy657040.85
Lithuania73010.55
Luxembourg4101—
Latvia5301—
Malta5001—
Netherlands1710310.35
Poland2325050.28
Portugal173100.71
Romania216060.67
Sweden109020.29
Slovenia7101—
Slovakia48120.42

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 617 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. Speeches: how many times they took the floor. Final vote: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Abir AL-SAHLANI SwedenRenewSpeeches110 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Katarina BARLEY GermanyS&DSpeeches110 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Christel SCHALDEMOSE DenmarkS&DSpeeches13 Apr 2025 (verbatim report, official site) Against

All votes on this decision, 56

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Proposal to reject the text A10-0045/2025 – Abir Al-Sahlani – Proposal for rejection – Am 164= 165= 166= Roll call156 for, 462 against, 8 abstained Rejected
2Proposal to vote on amendments A10-0045/2025 – Abir Al-Sahlani – Proposal to vote on amendments Roll call160 for, 462 against, 2 abstained Rejected
3Final vote on the provisional agreement A10-0045/2025 – Abir Al-Sahlani – Provisional agreement – Am 163 Roll call414 for, 182 against, 21 abstained Adopted
Show the other 55 votesShow the other 53 votes
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
2Proposal to vote on amendments A10-0045/2025 – Abir Al-Sahlani – Proposal to vote on amendments Roll call160 for, 462 against, 2 abstained Rejected
3Final vote on the provisional agreement A10-0045/2025 – Abir Al-Sahlani – Provisional agreement – Am 163 Roll call414 for, 182 against, 21 abstained Adopted
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
4Final vote Text as a whole Show of hands Lapsed
5Amendments by the PfE Group — put to the vote collectively Amendments by the PfE Group – put to the vote collectively Show of hands Lapsed
6Separate vote on Article 1, paragraph 1 Show of hands Lapsed
7Separate vote on Article 1, paragraph 1 Show of hands Lapsed
8Separate vote on Article 3, after paragraph 1 Show of hands Lapsed
9Separate vote on Article 3, after paragraph 1 Show of hands Lapsed
10Separate vote on Article 9, paragraph 1, point d Show of hands Lapsed
11Separate vote on Article 9, paragraph 1, point d Show of hands Lapsed
12Separate vote on Article 9, paragraph 4 Show of hands Lapsed
13Separate vote on Article 10, paragraph 2, point c Show of hands Lapsed
14Separate vote on Article 10, paragraph 2, point c Show of hands Lapsed
15Separate vote on Article 12, paragraph 6 Show of hands Lapsed
16Separate vote on Article 12, paragraph 6 Show of hands Lapsed
17Separate vote on Article 14 Show of hands Lapsed
18Separate vote on Article 14 Show of hands Lapsed
19Separate vote on Article 14 Roll call0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained Lapsed
20Separate vote on Article 15 Show of hands Lapsed
21Separate vote on Article 15 Show of hands Lapsed
22Separate vote on Article 17 Article 17 – § 2 – point b Show of hands Lapsed
23Separate vote on Article 17 Article 17 – § 2 – point b Show of hands Lapsed
24Separate vote on Article 19 Show of hands Lapsed
25Separate vote on Article 19 Show of hands Lapsed
26Separate vote on Article 23, paragraph 1 Show of hands Lapsed
27Separate vote on Article 23, paragraph 1 Show of hands Lapsed
28Separate vote on Article 23, after paragraph 1 Roll call0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained Lapsed
29Separate vote on Article 23, after paragraph 1 Show of hands Lapsed
30Separate vote on recital 1 Roll call0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained Lapsed
31Separate vote on recital 1 Show of hands Lapsed
32Separate vote on recital 1 Show of hands Lapsed
33Separate vote on recital 2 Show of hands Lapsed
34Separate vote on recital 2 Show of hands Lapsed
35Separate vote on recital 3 Show of hands Lapsed
36Separate vote on recital 3 Show of hands Lapsed
37Separate vote on recital 4 Show of hands Lapsed
38Separate vote on recital 4 Show of hands Lapsed
39Separate vote on recital 20 Show of hands Lapsed
40Separate vote on recital 20 Show of hands Lapsed
41Separate vote on recital 21 Show of hands Lapsed
42Separate vote on recital 21 Show of hands Lapsed
43Vote on text inserted after recital 21 Roll call0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained Lapsed
44Separate vote on recital 22 Show of hands Lapsed
45Separate vote on recital 22 Show of hands Lapsed
46Separate vote on recital 25 Show of hands Lapsed
47Separate vote on recital 25 Show of hands Lapsed
48Separate vote on recital 27 Show of hands Lapsed
49Separate vote on recital 27 Show of hands Lapsed
50Separate vote on recital 30 Show of hands Lapsed
51Separate vote on recital 30 Show of hands Lapsed
52Separate vote on recital 31 Show of hands Lapsed
53Separate vote on recital 31 Show of hands Lapsed
54Separate vote on recital 33 Show of hands Lapsed
55Separate vote on recital 33 Show of hands Lapsed
56Final vote Commission proposal Roll call0 for, 0 against, 0 abstained Lapsed

Roll calls requested by ECR, Patriots, ESN.

Text

The text voted on.

Report A-10-2025-0045

AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

The EU talent pool is a proposed EU-wide platform to match jobseekers from non-EU countries with employers in the Union.

Parliament adopted its position on the law, backing the proposal with amendments.

The position calls on the Commission to refer the matter back if it substantially amends the proposal.

Read the text · Report a problem

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament's amended version of the proposed regulation establishing an EU talent pool to match jobseekers from third countries with employers in all member states.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2023/0404(COD) · Ordinary legislative procedure

Establishing an EU talent pool

Completed: published in the Official Journal on 12 May 2026 and now EU law.

Show the 6 steps of the dossier
  1. Referred to committee · 8 February 2024 (done)
  2. Committee work · Report adopted 19 March 2025 (done)
  3. Tabled for plenary · 26 March 2025 (done)
  4. Negotiations with the Council · Deal approved in committee 3 December 2025 (done)
  5. Plenary vote · Adopted 10 March 2026 (done)
  6. Published as law · 12 May 2026 (done)

Lead committee: LIBE · Rapporteur: Abir AL-SAHLANI (Renew)

Other decisions on this dossier

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 16 connections: Other decisions on this dossier · Running issue: EU competitiveness · Other decisions of the part-session on LIBE dossiers · Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Other decisions on this dossier

See all: Other decisions on this dossier

Running issue: EU competitiveness

Other decisions of the part-session on LIBE dossiers

See all: Other decisions of the part-session on LIBE dossiers

Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Establishing an EU talent pool”. Decision, 10 March 2026. votingId 186921, document A-10-2025-0045, reference 2023/0404(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-03-10/2 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-10/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2026-03-10-2,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Establishing an EU talent pool}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-03-10/2}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-03-10/2},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 186921, document A-10-2025-0045, reference 2023/0404(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}