Skip to content

Decision

EU-Ecuador Agreement: cooperation between Europol and the Ecuadorian authorities competent for combating serious crime and terrorism

Effect
Consent given
Result
586 for · 21 against · 11 abstained roll call
Date
11 March 2026, 12:52
Kind
International agreement · Consent procedure
More facts (8)
Margin
by an overwhelming majority
Source
Committee report by Matthieu Valet
Topics
Digital, AI & dataForeign affairsJustice, rule of law & rights Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes
1 vote · 1 roll call
Final vote
186376
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 586 for, 21 against, 11 abstained (roll call).

Consent given by an overwhelming majority.

Parliament gave its consent.

Backed by The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew, EPP, ECR, Patriots and ESN.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 19Against 18Abst. 4No vote 5 of 46Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.20
GreensFor 44Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 107Against 0Abst. 1No vote 27 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 65Against 0Abst. 3No vote 8 of 76Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
EPPFor 165Against 0Abst. 0No vote 19 of 184Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 77Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 63Against 0Abst. 0No vote 21 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 25Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 28Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 21Against 3Abst. 3No vote 4 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 4

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria200001.00
Belgium180220.85
Bulgaria150021.00
Cyprus4101—
Czechia190021.00
Germany863240.92
Denmark150001.00
Estonia6001—
Spain4221150.90
Finland140100.90
France3574350.64
Greece143130.67
Croatia110011.00
Hungary90012—
Ireland120021.00
Italy692050.96
Lithuania110001.00
Luxembourg6000—
Latvia9000—
Malta5001—
Netherlands300011.00
Poland481040.97
Portugal192000.86
Romania290041.00
Sweden190021.00
Slovenia8001—
Slovakia130021.00

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 618 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. Speeches: how many times they took the floor. Final vote: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Roberta METSOLA MaltaEPPSpeeches111 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Matthieu VALET FrancePatriotsSpeeches111 Mar 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For

All votes on this decision, 1

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Final vote on the draft Council decision A10-0028/2026 – Matthieu Valet – Draft Council decision Roll call586 for, 21 against, 11 abstained Adopted

Text

The text voted on.

Report A-10-2026-0028

AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

The agreement allows Europol and Ecuadorian authorities to exchange personal data to fight serious crime and terrorism, with safeguards for privacy and fundamental rights.

Parliament gave its consent, so the European Union can conclude the agreement with Ecuador.

Parliament asks its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission, and the governments and parliaments of the member states and Ecuador.

Read the text · Report a problem

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament gives its consent to the EU-Ecuador agreement allowing Europol to exchange personal data with Ecuadorian authorities to fight serious crime and terrorism.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2025/0120(NLE) · Non-legislative procedure

Conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement between the European Union, of the one part, and the Republic of Ecuador, of the other part, on cooperation between the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) and the Ecuadorian authorities competent for combatting serious crime and terrorism

Completed: published in the Official Journal on 15 April 2026 and now EU law.

Show the 5 steps of the dossier
  1. Referred to committee · 20 October 2025 (done)
  2. Committee work · Report adopted 23 February 2026 (done)
  3. Tabled for plenary · 25 February 2026 (done)
  4. Plenary vote · Adopted 11 March 2026 (done)
  5. Adopted by the Council · 15 April 2026 (done)

Lead committee: LIBE · Rapporteur: Matthieu VALET (Patriots)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 4 connections: Other decisions of the part-session on LIBE dossiers

Other decisions of the part-session on LIBE dossiers

See all: Other decisions of the part-session on LIBE dossiers

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “EU-Ecuador Agreement: cooperation between Europol and the Ecuadorian authorities competent for combating serious crime and terrorism”. Decision, 11 March 2026. votingId 186376, document A-10-2026-0028, reference 2025/0120(NLE). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-03-11/3 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 11 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 11 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-11, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-11/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2026-03-11-3,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{EU-Ecuador Agreement: cooperation between Europol and the Ecuadorian authorities competent for combating serious crime and terrorism}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-11},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-03-11/3}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-03-11/3},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 186376, document A-10-2026-0028, reference 2025/0120(NLE). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-11 (CC BY 4.0)}
}