Skip to content

Decision

Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law

Effect
Consent given
Result
455 for · 101 against · 74 abstained roll call
Date
11 March 2026, 12:49
Kind
International agreement · Consent procedure
More facts (8)
Margin
by a large majority
Source
Committee report by José Cepeda, Paulo Cunha
Topics
Justice, rule of law & rightsDigital, AI & data Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes
1 vote · 1 roll call
Final vote
186516
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 455 for, 101 against, 74 abstained (roll call).

Consent given by a large majority.

Parliament gave its consent.

Backed by The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew and EPP; opposed by Patriots and ESN; ECR mostly abstained.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 42Against 0Abst. 1No vote 3 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
GreensFor 47Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 116Against 0Abst. 0No vote 19 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 69Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 76Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 164Against 0Abst. 0No vote 20 of 184Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 3Against 11Abst. 63No vote 4 of 81Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.73
PatriotsFor 0Against 56Abst. 7No vote 21 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.83
ESNFor 0Against 25Abst. 0No vote 3 of 28Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 14Against 9Abst. 3No vote 5 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 22

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria146000.55
Belgium163210.64
Bulgaria113120.60
Cyprus4011—
Czechia721020.29
Germany7613150.77
Denmark132000.80
Estonia5101—
Spain4142130.81
Finland141000.90
France36211230.43
Greece134220.53
Croatia100021.00
Hungary27012—
Ireland120021.00
Italy3992260.34
Lithuania91100.73
Luxembourg6000—
Latvia5130—
Malta5001—
Netherlands245110.70
Poland2461940.23
Portugal182100.79
Romania220650.68
Sweden163020.76
Slovenia8001—
Slovakia57120.31

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 630 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

No plenary speech is linked to this dossier.

All votes on this decision, 1

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Final vote on the draft Council decision A10-0007/2026 – José Cepeda, Paulo Cunha – Draft Council decision Roll call455 for, 101 against, 74 abstained Adopted

Text

The text voted on.

Report A-10-2026-0007

AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

The Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law is the first international legally binding treaty on AI governance, covering the entire AI lifecycle.

Parliament gave its consent to the EU concluding this Convention, meaning the EU can now ratify it.

The Convention requires parties to ensure AI systems respect human rights, democracy, and the rule of law, with measures like risk assessments and transparency.

Read the text · Report a problem

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament gives its consent to the conclusion of the Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law, which is the first international legally binding treaty on AI governance.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2025/0136(NLE) · Non-legislative procedure

Conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law

Completed: published in the Official Journal on 13 May 2026 and now EU law.

Show the 5 steps of the dossier
  1. Referred to committee · 6 October 2025 (done)
  2. Committee work · Report adopted 27 January 2026 (done)
  3. Tabled for plenary · 2 February 2026 (done)
  4. Plenary vote · Adopted 11 March 2026 (done)
  5. Adopted by the Council · 13 May 2026 (done)

Lead committee: LIBE · Rapporteurs: José CEPEDA (S&D), Paulo CUNHA (EPP)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 15 connections: Running issue: EU fundamental rights · Other decisions of the part-session on LIBE dossiers · Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Running issue: EU fundamental rights

Other decisions of the part-session on LIBE dossiers

See all: Other decisions of the part-session on LIBE dossiers

Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law”. Decision, 11 March 2026. votingId 186516, document A-10-2026-0007, reference 2025/0136(NLE). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-03-11/2 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 11 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 11 March 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-11, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-03-11/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2026-03-11-2,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-03-11},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-03-11/2}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-03-11/2},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 186516, document A-10-2026-0007, reference 2025/0136(NLE). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-03-11-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-03-11 (CC BY 4.0)}
}