Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 73, after recital H

The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders

Vote
Amendment 73, after recital H
Decision
No. 9 of the sitting of 17 Sept 2026
Result
181 for · 399 against · 2 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
17 September 2026, 13:58
More facts (6)
Position
vote 125 of 138 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR
Official label
B10-0406/2026 – After recital H – Am 73
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0411
Dossier
2026/2870(RSP)
Vote id
197198
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 31 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 35Abst. 0No vote 9 of 44Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 44Abst. 1No vote 8 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 0Against 112Abst. 0No vote 23 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 7Against 56Abst. 0No vote 15 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.83
EPPFor 3Against 143Abst. 0No vote 38 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
ECRFor 69Against 0Abst. 0No vote 15 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 66Against 0Abst. 0No vote 18 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 24Against 0Abst. 1No vote 2 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 12Against 9Abst. 0No vote 7 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria600
Belgium300
Czechia500
Denmark100
Spain600
France2600
Greece100
Hungary500
Italy500
Latvia100
Netherlands400
Poland200
Portugal100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 582 members

No vote recorded, 135

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 135 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Amendment 29, adding text after paragraph 36 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment202 for, 423 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.97 513 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 32 to paragraph 13 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAmendment204 for, 444 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 530 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 30, adding text after paragraph 3 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAmendment197 for, 465 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 30 %r · shared0.96 561 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 Oct 2025Amendment 485 Draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment191 for, 452 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 29 %r · shared0.96 525 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 72, adding text after paragraph 39 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034Amendment186 for, 446 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 526 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 19 Discharge 2024: AgenciesAmendment200 for, 432 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 519 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 115, adding text after recital 14 Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measuresAmendment189 for, 478 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.95 562 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 29, adding text after paragraph 2 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAmendment192 for, 465 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 29 %r · shared0.95 559 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 23, adding text after paragraph 30 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section IIIAmendment186 for, 443 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.95 521 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 102, adding text after paragraph 53 Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measuresAmendment178 for, 463 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 553 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197198
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 73, after recital H — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders”. Vote, 17 September 2026. votingId 197198, reference 2026/2870(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197198 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-17-197198,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 73, after recital H — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197198}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197198},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 197198, reference 2026/2870(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}