Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 16, after recital G

The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders

Vote
Amendment 16, after recital G
Decision
No. 9 of the sitting of 17 Sept 2026
Result
252 for · 326 against · 8 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
17 September 2026, 13:58
More facts (6)
Position
vote 122 of 138 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens
Official label
B10-0406/2026 – After recital G – Am 16
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0411
Dossier
2026/2870(RSP)
Vote id
197194
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 43 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 36Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 44Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 45Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 108Against 0Abst. 3No vote 24 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
RenewFor 54Against 7Abst. 3No vote 14 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.77
EPPFor 1Against 146Abst. 0No vote 37 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 1Against 69Abst. 0No vote 14 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 0Against 66Abst. 0No vote 18 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 25Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 7Against 13Abst. 2No vote 6 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria060
Belgium030
Czechia050
Denmark010
Spain060
France0260
Greece010
Hungary050
Italy050
Latvia010
Netherlands040
Poland020
Portugal010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 586 members

No vote recorded, 131

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 131 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Jun 2025Separate vote on paragraph 24 Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in SevilleSeparate vote278 for, 371 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by S&D, Renewr · shared0.97 533 voters
12 Feb 2026Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 46 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategyAmendment251 for, 309 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.97 474 voters
13 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 67 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Separate vote251 for, 349 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 41 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.97 508 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Jul 2025Request for urgent procedure Final vote European Climate LawProcedural300 for, 379 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 44 %r · shared0.96 551 voters
13 Nov 2025Recital G — part 2 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Split vote254 for, 335 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.96 500 voters
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 50 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Separate vote272 for, 348 against, 23 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by Greens, EPPr · shared0.96 528 voters
17 Jun 2025Separate vote on paragraph 69 Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in SevilleSeparate vote291 for, 356 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.96 533 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 13 to paragraph 123 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European ParliamentAmendment275 for, 374 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 536 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point g — part 2 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote255 for, 290 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.96 466 voters
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 48 — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote281 for, 350 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greens, EPPr · shared0.95 527 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197194
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 16, after recital G — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders”. Vote, 17 September 2026. votingId 197194, reference 2026/2870(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197194 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-17-197194,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 16, after recital G — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197194}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197194},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 197194, reference 2026/2870(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}