Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Recital F — part 3

The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders

Vote
Recital F — part 3
Decision
No. 9 of the sitting of 17 Sept 2026
Result
381 for · 190 against · 4 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
17 September 2026, 13:57
More facts (6)
Position
vote 119 of 138 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: EPP · split vote: Greens, Renew, S&D
Official label
B10-0406/2026 – Recital F/3
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0411
Dossier
2026/2870(RSP)
Vote id
197190
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 66 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “whereas the letter also called for enhanced Frontex support and effective cooperation with Morocco on returns;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 32Abst. 0No vote 12 of 44Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 2Against 43Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
S&DFor 9Against 102Abst. 0No vote 24 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
RenewFor 56Against 6Abst. 1No vote 15 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.83
EPPFor 143Against 1Abst. 0No vote 40 of 184Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 68Against 0Abst. 0No vote 16 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 65Against 0Abst. 0No vote 19 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 25Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 13Against 6Abst. 3No vote 6 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria500
Belgium300
Bulgaria500
Cyprus200
Czechia500
Germany2410
Denmark200
Estonia200
Spain2100
Finland200
France400
Greece100
Croatia500
Hungary500
Ireland100
Italy800
Lithuania300
Luxembourg200
Latvia200
Malta100
Netherlands300
Poland1900
Portugal700
Romania500
Sweden200
Slovenia300
Slovakia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 575 members

No vote recorded, 142

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 142 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
1 Apr 2025Request for urgent procedure Final vote Amending Directives (EU) 2022/2464 and (EU) 2024/1760 as regards the dates from which Member States are to apply certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsProcedural427 for, 221 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 65 %r · shared0.91 527 voters
6 Jul 2026Monday’s agenda — Request by the ECR Group — Italy and Denmark Final vote Monday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group – Italy and DenmarkOther283 for, 142 against, 11 abstained Adopted For 65 %r · shared0.91 359 voters
1 Apr 2025Amendment 7 — part 2 Macro-financial assistance to EgyptAmendment443 for, 226 against, 0 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.91 536 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Dec 2025Decision to open negotiations with the Council Final vote Establishment of a list of safe countries of origin at Union levelFinal396 for, 202 against, 56 abstained Adopted For 61 %r · shared0.90 523 voters
17 Jun 2026Final vote on the provisional agreement Common system for the return of third-country nationals staying illegally in the Union (Return Regulation)Final418 for, 218 against, 30 abstained Adopted For 63 %r · shared0.90 546 voters
11 Sept 2025Final vote — text as a whole Situation in Colombia after the wave of recent terrorist attacksFinal355 for, 173 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.90 446 voters
17 Sept 2026Final vote — text as a whole Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí NavarroFinal374 for, 198 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.88 551 voters
1 Apr 2025Amendment 7 — part 4 Macro-financial assistance to EgyptAmendment423 for, 232 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.87 539 voters
1 Apr 2025Amendment 17 — part 2 Macro-financial assistance to EgyptAmendment439 for, 232 against, 3 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.87 538 voters
13 Nov 2025Referral back to committee Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsProcedural426 for, 202 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 67 %r · shared0.87 510 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197190
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Recital F — part 3 — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders”. Vote, 17 September 2026. votingId 197190, reference 2026/2870(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197190 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-17-197190,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Recital F — part 3 — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197190}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197190},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 197190, reference 2026/2870(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}