Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Recital F — part 1

The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders

Vote
Recital F — part 1
Decision
No. 9 of the sitting of 17 Sept 2026
Result
524 for · 48 against · 5 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
17 September 2026, 13:57
More facts (6)
Position
vote 117 of 138 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: EPP · split vote: Greens, Renew, S&D
Official label
B10-0406/2026 – Recital F/1
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0411
Dossier
2026/2870(RSP)
Vote id
197188
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 91 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “whereas on 1 August 2026, 22 heads of state and government signed a joint letter calling for an immediate and coordinated European response;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 33Abst. 1No vote 10 of 44Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 41Against 3Abst. 0No vote 9 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.90
S&DFor 113Against 0Abst. 0No vote 22 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 54Against 6Abst. 1No vote 17 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.83
EPPFor 144Against 0Abst. 0No vote 40 of 184Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 66Against 3Abst. 0No vote 15 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
PatriotsFor 66Against 0Abst. 0No vote 18 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 24Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 16Against 3Abst. 3No vote 6 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium200
Czechia100
Germany1400
Denmark200
Spain030
Finland100
France400
Croatia100
Italy100
Lithuania100
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands500
Romania100
Sweden300
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 577 members

No vote recorded, 140

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 140 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

The minority on this vote was under 10 % of the votes cast — too small to compare how it split the chamber.

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197188
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Recital F — part 1 — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders”. Vote, 17 September 2026. votingId 197188, reference 2026/2870(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197188 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-17-197188,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Recital F — part 1 — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197188}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197188},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 197188, reference 2026/2870(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}