Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 55 to recital C

The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders

Vote
Amendment 55 to recital C
Decision
No. 9 of the sitting of 17 Sept 2026
Result
95 for · 486 against · 11 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
17 September 2026, 13:53
More facts (6)
Position
vote 98 of 138 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
B10-0406/2026 – Recital C – Am 55
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0411
Dossier
2026/2870(RSP)
Vote id
197171
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 16 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 36Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 44Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 46Against 1Abst. 1No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
S&DFor 0Against 108Abst. 5No vote 22 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
RenewFor 1Against 63Abst. 1No vote 13 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.95
EPPFor 1Against 146Abst. 0No vote 37 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 0Against 71Abst. 0No vote 13 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 0Against 65Abst. 0No vote 19 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 2Against 23Abst. 1No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.83
No groupFor 9Against 9Abst. 3No vote 7 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria030
Czechia001
Germany0140
France010
Hungary010
Italy010
Lithuania010
Poland200
Slovakia020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 592 members

No vote recorded, 125

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 125 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 Jul 2026Amendment 35, adding text after paragraph 50 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment94 for, 559 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 14 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.92 549 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 124 to Article 19, After paragraph 1 (corresponds to Article 22 in am 120) Generalised scheme of tariff preferencesAmendment95 for, 551 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.92 542 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 185 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment96 for, 541 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.92 526 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Oct 2025Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 8 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2024Amendment101 for, 501 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.92 508 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 45, adding text after paragraph 1 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section IIIAmendment99 for, 547 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.91 542 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 37 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment107 for, 538 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.91 552 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 46 to paragraph 41 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAmendment99 for, 516 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.91 516 voters
12 Mar 2026Amendment 4 to Annex, point a Calculation of emission credits for heavy-duty vehicles for the reporting periods of the years 2025 to 2029Amendment81 for, 468 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.91 476 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 184 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment99 for, 533 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.91 525 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 26 to paragraph 38 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment100 for, 551 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.91 556 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197171
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 55 to recital C — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders”. Vote, 17 September 2026. votingId 197171, reference 2026/2870(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197171 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-17-197171,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 55 to recital C — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197171}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197171},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 197171, reference 2026/2870(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}