Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 72, after recital B

The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders

Vote
Amendment 72, after recital B
Decision
No. 9 of the sitting of 17 Sept 2026
Result
345 for · 242 against · 5 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
17 September 2026, 13:53
More facts (6)
Position
vote 97 of 138 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR
Official label
B10-0406/2026 – After recital B – Am 72
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0411
Dossier
2026/2870(RSP)
Vote id
197170
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 58 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 35Abst. 0No vote 9 of 44Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 2Against 45Abst. 1No vote 5 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.91
S&DFor 7Against 105Abst. 1No vote 22 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.89
RenewFor 15Against 49Abst. 0No vote 14 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.65
EPPFor 147Against 0Abst. 1No vote 36 of 184Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 71Against 0Abst. 0No vote 13 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 67Against 0Abst. 0No vote 17 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 24Against 0Abst. 1No vote 2 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 12Against 8Abst. 1No vote 7 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria300
Czechia001
Germany1300
France100
Hungary100
Italy100
Lithuania100
Poland200
Slovakia200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 592 members

No vote recorded, 125

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 125 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
28 Apr 2026Amendment 5 to paragraph 40 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section IIIAmendment370 for, 266 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.95 534 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 228 + 287 (voted as one) to recital 26 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment360 for, 277 against, 4 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.94 529 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 227 + 285 (voted as one) to recital 19 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment364 for, 269 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.94 528 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendments 235 + 294 (voted as one) to Article 2 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment367 for, 274 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ESN, ECRr · shared0.94 532 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 233 + 292 (voted as one) to Article 2 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment367 for, 274 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ESN, ECRr · shared0.94 532 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 225 + 283 (voted as one) to recital 14 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment365 for, 271 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.94 532 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 234 + 293 (voted as one) to Article 2 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment364 for, 275 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by S&D, ESN, ECRr · shared0.94 531 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 238 + 298 (voted as one) to Article 3 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment367 for, 272 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.94 531 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 232 + 291 (voted as one) to Article 2 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment366 for, 273 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ESN, ECRr · shared0.94 530 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 241 + 301 (voted as one) to Article 3 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment364 for, 273 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ESN, ECRr · shared0.94 530 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197170
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 72, after recital B — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders”. Vote, 17 September 2026. votingId 197170, reference 2026/2870(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197170 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-17-197170,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 72, after recital B — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197170}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197170},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 197170, reference 2026/2870(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}