Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Separate vote: recital A

The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders

Vote
Separate vote: recital A
Decision
No. 9 of the sitting of 17 Sept 2026
Result
459 for · 120 against · 10 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
17 September 2026, 13:53
More facts (6)
Position
vote 95 of 138 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
B10-0406/2026 – Recital A
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0411
Dossier
2026/2870(RSP)
Vote id
197169
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 78 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 35Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 44Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 47Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 114Against 0Abst. 0No vote 21 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 64Against 0Abst. 0No vote 14 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 147Against 0Abst. 0No vote 37 of 184Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 45Against 24Abst. 0No vote 15 of 84Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.48
PatriotsFor 0Against 63Abst. 4No vote 17 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.91
ESNFor 0Against 24Abst. 0No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 7Against 9Abst. 6No vote 6 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria500
Belgium300
Bulgaria500
Cyprus200
Czechia500
Germany2500
Denmark200
Estonia200
Spain2100
Finland200
France400
Greece100
Croatia500
Hungary500
Ireland100
Italy800
Lithuania300
Luxembourg200
Latvia200
Malta200
Netherlands300
Poland2200
Portugal600
Romania500
Sweden200
Slovenia300
Slovakia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 589 members

No vote recorded, 128

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 128 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Jun 2026Final vote on the provisional agreement Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesFinal437 for, 112 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 77 %r · shared0.91 483 voters
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 101 — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote449 for, 141 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.90 527 voters
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2024: AgenciesFinal475 for, 107 against, 71 abstained Adopted For 73 %r · shared0.90 535 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
7 Jul 2026Paragraph 27 — part 2 A new strategy for media literacy and digital learningSplit vote497 for, 138 against, 17 abstained Adopted For 76 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.90 540 voters
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European ParliamentFinal441 for, 131 against, 81 abstained Adopted For 68 %r · shared0.89 533 voters
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European Council and CouncilFinal432 for, 160 against, 65 abstained Adopted For 66 %r · shared0.89 537 voters
7 Jul 2026Separate vote on paragraph 14 A new strategy for media literacy and digital learningSeparate vote455 for, 151 against, 41 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.88 535 voters
7 Jul 2026Final vote — text as a whole A new strategy for media literacy and digital learningFinal447 for, 128 against, 78 abstained Adopted For 68 %r · shared0.88 538 voters
10 Sept 2025Final vote — text as a whole Role of cohesion policy in supporting the just transitionFinal519 for, 99 against, 48 abstained Adopted For 78 %r · shared0.87 539 voters
11 Mar 2026Final vote on the draft Council decision Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of LawFinal455 for, 101 against, 74 abstained Adopted For 72 %r · shared0.87 519 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197169
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Separate vote: recital A — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders”. Vote, 17 September 2026. votingId 197169, reference 2026/2870(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197169 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-17-197169,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Separate vote: recital A — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197169}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197169},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 197169, reference 2026/2870(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}