Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 42, after citation 5

The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders

Vote
Amendment 42, after citation 5
Result
439 for · 128 against · 30 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
17 September 2026, 13:52
More facts (6)
Position
vote 94 of 138 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D
Official label
B10-0406/2026 – After citation 5 – Am 42
Vote id
197168
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 74 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 36Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 44Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 48Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 115Against 0Abst. 0No vote 20 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 65Against 0Abst. 0No vote 13 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 125Against 1Abst. 22No vote 36 of 184Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.77
ECRFor 42Against 27Abst. 2No vote 13 of 84Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.39
PatriotsFor 0Against 62Abst. 4No vote 18 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.91
ESNFor 0Against 26Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 8Against 12Abst. 2No vote 6 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria060
Belgium030
Czechia014
Denmark010
Spain060
France0260
Greece010
Hungary050
Italy050
Latvia010
Netherlands050
Poland010
Portugal010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 597 members

No vote recorded, 120

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 120 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 101 — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote449 for, 141 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.90 535 voters
18 Jun 2026Final vote on the provisional agreement Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesFinal437 for, 112 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 77 %r · shared0.89 490 voters
7 Jul 2026Paragraph 27 — part 2 A new strategy for media literacy and digital learningSplit vote497 for, 138 against, 17 abstained Adopted For 76 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.89 546 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Sept 2025Final vote — text as a whole Role of cohesion policy in supporting the just transitionFinal519 for, 99 against, 48 abstained Adopted For 78 %r · shared0.88 546 voters
19 Jun 2025Final vote — text as a whole Electricity grids: the backbone of the EU energy systemFinal418 for, 112 against, 45 abstained Adopted For 73 %r · shared0.87 484 voters
7 Jul 2026Final vote — text as a whole A new strategy for media literacy and digital learningFinal447 for, 128 against, 78 abstained Adopted For 68 %r · shared0.86 545 voters
7 May 2025Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2023: AgenciesFinal503 for, 121 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 77 %r · shared0.86 535 voters
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2024: AgenciesFinal475 for, 107 against, 71 abstained Adopted For 73 %r · shared0.86 543 voters
11 Mar 2026Final vote on the draft Council decision Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of LawFinal455 for, 101 against, 74 abstained Adopted For 72 %r · shared0.86 526 voters
7 Jul 2026Separate vote on paragraph 14 A new strategy for media literacy and digital learningSeparate vote455 for, 151 against, 41 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.85 542 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 42, after citation 5 — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders”. Vote, 17 September 2026. votingId 197168, reference 2026/2870(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197168 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-17-197168,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 42, after citation 5 — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197168}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197168},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 197168, reference 2026/2870(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}