Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 40, after citation 1

The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders

Vote
Amendment 40, after citation 1
Decision
No. 9 of the sitting of 17 Sept 2026
Result
392 for · 132 against · 62 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
17 September 2026, 13:52
More facts (6)
Position
vote 92 of 138 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D
Official label
B10-0406/2026 – After citation 1 – Am 40
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0411
Dossier
2026/2870(RSP)
Vote id
197167
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 67 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 35Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 44Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 47Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 113Against 0Abst. 0No vote 22 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 64Against 0Abst. 0No vote 14 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 122Against 1Abst. 21No vote 40 of 184Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.77
ECRFor 1Against 32Abst. 37No vote 14 of 84Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.29
PatriotsFor 0Against 63Abst. 3No vote 18 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
ESNFor 0Against 26Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 10Against 10Abst. 1No vote 7 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium200
Germany100
Denmark100
Spain400
Finland300
France900
Greece100
Ireland200
Italy900
Netherlands100
Portugal100
Sweden100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 586 members

No vote recorded, 131

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 131 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 101 — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote449 for, 141 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.95 526 voters
25 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 22 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSeparate vote453 for, 168 against, 22 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.92 521 voters
25 Nov 2025Separate vote on recital BI Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSeparate vote418 for, 160 against, 51 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.92 514 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 Jan 2026Paragraph 11 — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote430 for, 157 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.92 502 voters
7 Jul 2026Final vote — text as a whole A new strategy for media literacy and digital learningFinal447 for, 128 against, 78 abstained Adopted For 68 %r · shared0.91 535 voters
7 Jul 2025Wednesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left GroupOther308 for, 101 against, 0 abstained Adopted For 75 %r · shared0.91 329 voters
25 Nov 2025Separate vote on recital AK Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSeparate vote440 for, 175 against, 22 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.91 518 voters
9 Sept 2025Recital AH — part 2 of 2 Public procurementSplit vote448 for, 186 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.91 515 voters
22 Jan 2026Recital P — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote419 for, 158 against, 25 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.91 499 voters
22 Jan 2026Paragraph 10 — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote427 for, 161 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.91 506 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197167
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 40, after citation 1 — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders”. Vote, 17 September 2026. votingId 197167, reference 2026/2870(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197167 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-17-197167,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 40, after citation 1 — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197167}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197167},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 197167, reference 2026/2870(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}