Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 79, after paragraph 15

The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders

Vote
Amendment 79, after paragraph 15
Decision
No. 9 of the sitting of 17 Sept 2026
Result
448 for · 137 against · 5 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
17 September 2026, 13:52
More facts (6)
Position
vote 91 of 138 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR
Official label
B10-0406/2026 – After § 15 – Am 79
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0411
Dossier
2026/2870(RSP)
Vote id
197166
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 76 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 13Against 20Abst. 1No vote 10 of 44Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.38
GreensFor 44Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 4Against 110Abst. 1No vote 20 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
RenewFor 64Against 1Abst. 0No vote 13 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 146Against 1Abst. 0No vote 37 of 184Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 71Against 0Abst. 0No vote 13 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 67Against 0Abst. 0No vote 17 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 26Against 0Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 13Against 5Abst. 3No vote 7 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ECR members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium100
Bulgaria200
Cyprus100
Czechia200
Denmark100
Estonia100
Spain200
Finland100
France400
Greece200
Croatia100
Italy2000
Lithuania200
Latvia200
Netherlands300
Poland1800
Romania600
Sweden200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 590 members

No vote recorded, 127

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 127 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 71 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European External Action ServiceSeparate vote458 for, 178 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.85 536 voters
18 Jun 2026Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 Recruitment of children by organised crimeAmendment372 for, 139 against, 58 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.81 485 voters
11 Sept 2025Final vote — text as a whole Situation in Colombia after the wave of recent terrorist attacksFinal355 for, 173 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.78 452 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 May 2025Amendment 30, adding text after paragraph 2 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023Amendment397 for, 139 against, 55 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.77 489 voters
6 May 2025Final vote — text as a whole Control of the financial activities of the European Investment Bank – annual report 2023Final340 for, 162 against, 150 abstained Adopted For 52 %r · shared0.76 530 voters
1 Apr 2025Request for urgent procedure Final vote Amending Directives (EU) 2022/2464 and (EU) 2024/1760 as regards the dates from which Member States are to apply certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsProcedural427 for, 221 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 65 %r · shared0.76 542 voters
7 May 2025Final vote Discharge 2023: AgenciesFinal520 for, 126 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 80 %r · shared0.75 529 voters
1 Apr 2025Amendment 7 — part 2 Macro-financial assistance to EgyptAmendment443 for, 226 against, 0 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.74 550 voters
15 Jun 2026Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the Renew Group — Middle East Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the Renew Group – Middle EastOther336 for, 86 against, 11 abstained Adopted For 78 %r · shared0.74 370 voters
17 Sept 2026Final vote — text as a whole Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí NavarroFinal374 for, 198 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.73 565 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197166
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 79, after paragraph 15 — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders”. Vote, 17 September 2026. votingId 197166, reference 2026/2870(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197166 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-17-197166,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 79, after paragraph 15 — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197166}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197166},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 197166, reference 2026/2870(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}