Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 13 — part 2

The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders

Vote
Paragraph 13 — part 2
Decision
No. 9 of the sitting of 17 Sept 2026
Result
351 for · 232 against · 3 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
17 September 2026, 13:50
More facts (6)
Position
vote 78 of 138 on the decision
Requested by
split vote: Renew, S&D
Official label
B10-0406/2026 – § 13/2
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0411
Dossier
2026/2870(RSP)
Vote id
197154
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 60 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “those words”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 35Abst. 0No vote 9 of 44Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 47Abst. 1No vote 5 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 1Against 110Abst. 0No vote 24 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 28Against 34Abst. 0No vote 16 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.32
EPPFor 144Against 0Abst. 1No vote 39 of 184Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 70Against 0Abst. 1No vote 13 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 67Against 0Abst. 0No vote 17 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 26Against 0Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 15Against 6Abst. 0No vote 7 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria020
Belgium020
Czechia010
Germany0150
Denmark020
Spain040
Finland010
France040
Croatia010
Italy030
Lithuania001
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Netherlands050
Romania010
Sweden030
Slovenia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 586 members

No vote recorded, 131

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 131 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendments 252 + 314 (voted as one) to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment364 for, 270 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by ESN, ECRr · shared0.92 521 voters
14 Nov 2024Final vote Deforestation Regulation: provisions relating to the date of applicationFinal371 for, 240 against, 30 abstained Adopted For 58 %r · shared0.92 515 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 227 + 285 (voted as one) to recital 19 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment364 for, 269 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.92 521 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendments 254 + 316 + 2 (voted as one) to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment368 for, 271 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by ESN, ECRr · shared0.92 525 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 224 + 282 (voted as one) to recital 12 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment364 for, 266 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.91 518 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 235 + 294 (voted as one) to Article 2 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment367 for, 274 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ESN, ECRr · shared0.91 525 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 233 + 292 (voted as one) to Article 2 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment367 for, 274 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ESN, ECRr · shared0.91 525 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 234 + 293 (voted as one) to Article 2 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment364 for, 275 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by S&D, ESN, ECRr · shared0.91 524 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 232 + 291 (voted as one) to Article 2 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment366 for, 273 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ESN, ECRr · shared0.91 523 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 238 + 298 (voted as one) to Article 3 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment367 for, 272 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.91 524 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197154
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 13 — part 2 — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders”. Vote, 17 September 2026. votingId 197154, reference 2026/2870(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197154 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-17-197154,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 13 — part 2 — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197154}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197154},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 197154, reference 2026/2870(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}