Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 53, after paragraph 12

The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders

Vote
Amendment 53, after paragraph 12
Decision
No. 9 of the sitting of 17 Sept 2026
Result
390 for · 143 against · 64 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
17 September 2026, 13:49
More facts (6)
Position
vote 73 of 138 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D
Official label
B10-0406/2026 – After § 12 – Am 53
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0411
Dossier
2026/2870(RSP)
Vote id
197150
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 65 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 36Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 44Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 48Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 114Against 0Abst. 0No vote 21 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 58Against 7Abst. 0No vote 13 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.84
EPPFor 124Against 1Abst. 22No vote 37 of 184Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.77
ECRFor 0Against 31Abst. 41No vote 12 of 84Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.35
PatriotsFor 0Against 67Abst. 0No vote 17 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 25Abst. 1No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 10Against 12Abst. 0No vote 6 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria400
Belgium300
Bulgaria410
Cyprus200
Czechia400
Germany2400
Denmark101
Estonia200
Spain0020
Finland200
France400
Greece100
Croatia600
Hungary500
Ireland100
Italy800
Lithuania300
Luxembourg200
Latvia200
Malta200
Netherlands300
Poland2200
Portugal700
Romania600
Sweden300
Slovenia201
Slovakia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 597 members

No vote recorded, 120

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 120 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 101 — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote449 for, 141 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.92 537 voters
7 Jul 2026Separate vote on paragraph 14 A new strategy for media literacy and digital learningSeparate vote455 for, 151 against, 41 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.90 542 voters
22 Jan 2026Paragraph 11 — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote430 for, 157 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.89 512 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
25 Nov 2025Separate vote on recital AK Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSeparate vote440 for, 175 against, 22 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.89 527 voters
25 Nov 2025Separate vote on recital BI Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSeparate vote418 for, 160 against, 51 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.89 524 voters
7 Jul 2026Final vote — text as a whole A new strategy for media literacy and digital learningFinal447 for, 128 against, 78 abstained Adopted For 68 %r · shared0.89 545 voters
25 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 22 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSeparate vote453 for, 168 against, 22 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.89 532 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 1 Market stability reserve for the buildings, road transport and additional sectorAmendment428 for, 186 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.89 536 voters
22 Jan 2026Recital P — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote419 for, 158 against, 25 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.89 509 voters
9 Sept 2025Recital AH — part 2 of 2 Public procurementSplit vote448 for, 186 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.89 523 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197150
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 53, after paragraph 12 — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders”. Vote, 17 September 2026. votingId 197150, reference 2026/2870(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197150 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-17-197150,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 53, after paragraph 12 — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197150}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197150},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 197150, reference 2026/2870(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}