Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 12 — part 4

The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders

Vote
Paragraph 12 — part 4
Decision
No. 9 of the sitting of 17 Sept 2026
Result
441 for · 147 against · 7 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
17 September 2026, 13:49
More facts (6)
Position
vote 72 of 138 on the decision
Requested by
split vote: Patriots, S&D
Official label
B10-0406/2026 – § 12/4
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0411
Dossier
2026/2870(RSP)
Vote id
197149
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 74 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “asylum”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 17Against 19Abst. 0No vote 8 of 44Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.29
GreensFor 48Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 111Against 1Abst. 0No vote 23 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 64Against 1Abst. 0No vote 13 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 149Against 0Abst. 0No vote 35 of 184Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 46Against 25Abst. 0No vote 13 of 84Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.47
PatriotsFor 0Against 66Abst. 0No vote 18 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 24Abst. 2No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
No groupFor 6Against 11Abst. 5No vote 6 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium200
Germany100
Denmark100
Spain400
Finland300
France090
Greece100
Ireland200
Italy180
Netherlands010
Portugal110
Sweden100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 595 members

No vote recorded, 122

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 122 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
19 Jun 2025Final vote — text as a whole Clean Industrial DealFinal381 for, 173 against, 13 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by EPP, Patriotsr · shared0.85 479 voters
8 May 2025Final vote — text as a whole Competition policy – annual report 2024Final358 for, 124 against, 79 abstained Adopted For 64 %r · shared0.84 473 voters
11 Sept 2025Final vote — text as a whole A new vision for the European Universities alliancesFinal461 for, 100 against, 48 abstained Adopted For 76 %r · shared0.83 504 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
28 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section IIIFinal389 for, 191 against, 75 abstained Adopted For 59 %r · shared0.83 544 voters
18 Jun 2026Paragraph 9 — part 2 Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and FinlandSplit vote357 for, 144 against, 49 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.83 471 voters
16 Jun 2026Final vote — text as a whole Countering transnational repression – towards an EU strategy to protect Europe’s sovereignty and democratic valuesFinal434 for, 128 against, 104 abstained Adopted For 65 %r · shared0.83 557 voters
9 Jul 2025Paragraph 15 — part 2 The human cost of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the urgent need to end Russian aggression: the situation of illegally detained civilians and prisoners of war, and the continued bombing of civiliansSplit vote489 for, 151 against, 32 abstained Adopted For 73 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.83 556 voters
18 Jun 2025Final vote — text as a whole 2023 and 2024 reports on MoldovaFinal456 for, 118 against, 51 abstained Adopted For 73 %r · shared0.82 515 voters
18 Dec 2024Final vote — text as a whole Amendment of Annex VI – Powers and responsibilities of the standing committeesFinal448 for, 161 against, 40 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.82 536 voters
22 Oct 2025Paragraph 53 — part 2 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsSplit vote414 for, 199 against, 35 abstained Adopted For 64 %r · shared0.82 531 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197149
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 12 — part 4 — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders”. Vote, 17 September 2026. votingId 197149, reference 2026/2870(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197149 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-17-197149,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 12 — part 4 — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197149}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197149},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 197149, reference 2026/2870(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}