Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 12 — part 3

The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders

Vote
Paragraph 12 — part 3
Decision
No. 9 of the sitting of 17 Sept 2026
Result
427 for · 166 against · 7 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
17 September 2026, 13:48
More facts (6)
Position
vote 71 of 138 on the decision
Requested by
split vote: Patriots, S&D
Official label
B10-0406/2026 – § 12/3
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0411
Dossier
2026/2870(RSP)
Vote id
197148
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 71 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “full and”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 36Abst. 0No vote 8 of 44Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 45Against 3Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.91
S&DFor 113Against 2Abst. 0No vote 20 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
RenewFor 65Against 0Abst. 0No vote 13 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 151Against 1Abst. 0No vote 32 of 184Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 47Against 24Abst. 0No vote 13 of 84Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.49
PatriotsFor 1Against 65Abst. 0No vote 18 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
ESNFor 0Against 25Abst. 1No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 5Against 10Abst. 6No vote 7 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium200
Czechia100
Germany1500
Denmark200
Spain130
Finland100
France400
Croatia100
Italy300
Lithuania100
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands500
Romania100
Sweden300
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 600 members

No vote recorded, 117

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 117 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
19 Jun 2025Final vote — text as a whole Clean Industrial DealFinal381 for, 173 against, 13 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by EPP, Patriotsr · shared0.90 482 voters
18 Dec 2024Final vote — text as a whole Amendment of Annex VI – Powers and responsibilities of the standing committeesFinal448 for, 161 against, 40 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.88 541 voters
12 Mar 2025Final vote — text as a whole European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025Final469 for, 162 against, 54 abstained Adopted For 68 %r · shared0.88 560 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 Oct 2025Paragraph 53 — part 2 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsSplit vote414 for, 199 against, 35 abstained Adopted For 64 %r · shared0.85 535 voters
28 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section IIIFinal389 for, 191 against, 75 abstained Adopted For 59 %r · shared0.85 549 voters
10 Sept 2025Final vote — text as a whole Investments and reforms for European competitiveness and the creation of a Capital Markets UnionFinal407 for, 161 against, 97 abstained Adopted For 61 %r · shared0.84 546 voters
7 May 2025Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European External Action ServiceFinal475 for, 136 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 72 %r · shared0.84 548 voters
28 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 17 The role of ocean diplomacy for the competitiveness of EU fisheries and aquacultureSeparate vote484 for, 140 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 76 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.84 533 voters
21 Jan 2026Final vote — text as a whole Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025Final392 for, 179 against, 83 abstained Adopted For 60 %r · shared0.84 547 voters
18 Jun 2026Paragraph 9 — part 1 Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and FinlandSplit vote319 for, 190 against, 38 abstained Adopted For 58 %Requested by Patriots, ECRr · shared0.83 474 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197148
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 12 — part 3 — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders”. Vote, 17 September 2026. votingId 197148, reference 2026/2870(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197148 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-17-197148,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 12 — part 3 — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197148}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197148},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 197148, reference 2026/2870(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}