Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 36 to paragraph 12

The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders

Vote
Amendment 36 to paragraph 12
Decision
No. 9 of the sitting of 17 Sept 2026
Result
231 for · 355 against · 12 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
17 September 2026, 13:48
More facts (6)
Position
vote 68 of 138 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens
Official label
B10-0406/2026 – § 12 – Am 36
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0411
Dossier
2026/2870(RSP)
Vote id
197144
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 39 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 10Against 19Abst. 5No vote 10 of 44Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.34
GreensFor 48Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 113Against 1Abst. 0No vote 21 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 56Against 6Abst. 2No vote 14 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.81
EPPFor 1Against 150Abst. 0No vote 33 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 1Against 70Abst. 1No vote 12 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 0Against 67Abst. 0No vote 17 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 26Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 2Against 16Abst. 4No vote 6 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria030
Czechia010
Germany0140
France010
Hungary010
Italy010
Lithuania010
Poland020
Slovakia020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 598 members

No vote recorded, 119

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 119 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
28 Apr 2026Amendment 18 to paragraph 53 Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2024Amendment272 for, 357 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.92 539 voters
27 Nov 2025Amendment 1 Application of the Treaty provisions related to the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality and the role of national parliaments in the EU legislative processAmendment262 for, 327 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.91 510 voters
9 Jul 2025Request for urgent procedure Final vote European Climate LawProcedural300 for, 379 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 44 %r · shared0.91 563 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
28 Apr 2026Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 25 Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2024Amendment277 for, 349 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.91 537 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 22 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Council and CouncilAmendment246 for, 383 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 38 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.91 538 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 13 to paragraph 123 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European ParliamentAmendment275 for, 374 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 547 voters
17 Jun 2025Separate vote on paragraph 69 Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in SevilleSeparate vote291 for, 356 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.90 544 voters
17 Jun 2025Separate vote on paragraph 24 Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in SevilleSeparate vote278 for, 371 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by S&D, Renewr · shared0.90 544 voters
7 Jul 2026Amendment 3 to paragraph 27 A coherent tax framework for the EU’s financial sectorAmendment283 for, 341 against, 34 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.90 552 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 115 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment238 for, 395 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 37 %Requested by The Left, Patriotsr · shared0.90 534 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197144
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 36 to paragraph 12 — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders”. Vote, 17 September 2026. votingId 197144, reference 2026/2870(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197144 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-17-197144,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 36 to paragraph 12 — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197144}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197144},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 197144, reference 2026/2870(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}