Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 10 to paragraph 11

The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders

Vote
Amendment 10 to paragraph 11
Decision
No. 9 of the sitting of 17 Sept 2026
Result
208 for · 382 against · 5 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
17 September 2026, 13:46
More facts (6)
Position
vote 60 of 138 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN
Official label
B10-0406/2026 – § 11 – Am 10
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0411
Dossier
2026/2870(RSP)
Vote id
197137
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 35 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 35Abst. 0No vote 9 of 44Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 49Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 114Abst. 1No vote 20 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 4Against 58Abst. 2No vote 14 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.86
EPPFor 27Against 117Abst. 2No vote 38 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.70
ECRFor 73Against 0Abst. 0No vote 11 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 67Against 0Abst. 0No vote 17 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 25Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 12Against 9Abst. 0No vote 7 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria600
Belgium300
Czechia500
Denmark100
Spain600
France2600
Greece100
Hungary500
Italy500
Latvia100
Netherlands500
Poland200
Portugal100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 595 members

No vote recorded, 122

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 122 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Sept 2026Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 2 — part 2 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officersAmendment210 for, 396 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by Patriots, EPPr · shared0.95 587 voters
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 15 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Separate vote210 for, 417 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 33 %r · shared0.95 536 voters
16 Sept 2026Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 64 Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructureAmendment220 for, 432 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 577 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Dec 2025Amendment 3 to paragraph 8 Decarbonisation and modernisation of EU fisheries, and the development and deployment of fishing gearAmendment196 for, 367 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.93 494 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 48 to paragraph 20, point vii Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAmendment238 for, 409 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 37 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.93 541 voters
21 Jan 2026Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 10 Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2025Amendment231 for, 410 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 36 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 539 voters
9 Jul 2026Amendment 5 to recital E Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacreAmendment195 for, 391 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 511 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 11 to paragraph 9 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAmendment204 for, 423 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 539 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 5 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officersAmendment207 for, 397 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 592 voters
18 Dec 2025Amendment 1 to paragraph 1 Decarbonisation and modernisation of EU fisheries, and the development and deployment of fishing gearAmendment217 for, 365 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 37 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.92 493 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197137
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 10 to paragraph 11 — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders”. Vote, 17 September 2026. votingId 197137, reference 2026/2870(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197137 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-17-197137,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 10 to paragraph 11 — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197137}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197137},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 197137, reference 2026/2870(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}