Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 68 to paragraph 11

The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders

Vote
Amendment 68 to paragraph 11
Decision
No. 9 of the sitting of 17 Sept 2026
Result
235 for · 358 against · 9 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
17 September 2026, 13:46
More facts (6)
Position
vote 59 of 138 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
B10-0406/2026 – § 11 – Am 68
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0411
Dossier
2026/2870(RSP)
Vote id
197136
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 39 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 35Against 1Abst. 0No vote 8 of 44Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 47Against 1Abst. 1No vote 4 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
S&DFor 101Against 11Abst. 2No vote 21 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.83
RenewFor 48Against 16Abst. 0No vote 14 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.63
EPPFor 0Against 151Abst. 1No vote 32 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 0Against 73Abst. 0No vote 11 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 0Against 66Abst. 0No vote 18 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 26Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 4Against 13Abst. 5No vote 6 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria030
Czechia010
Germany0140
France010
Hungary010
Italy010
Lithuania010
Poland020
Slovakia020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 602 members

No vote recorded, 115

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 115 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 67 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Separate vote251 for, 349 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 41 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.92 520 voters
17 Jun 2025Separate vote on paragraph 24 Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in SevilleSeparate vote278 for, 371 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by S&D, Renewr · shared0.92 548 voters
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 50 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Separate vote272 for, 348 against, 23 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by Greens, EPPr · shared0.91 542 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendments 207 + 266 + 348 (voted as one) to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment251 for, 378 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by S&D, The Leftr · shared0.91 537 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 13 to paragraph 123 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European ParliamentAmendment275 for, 374 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 551 voters
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 48 — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote281 for, 350 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greens, EPPr · shared0.91 541 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 20 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Council and CouncilAmendment283 for, 358 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.91 549 voters
12 Feb 2026Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 46 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategyAmendment251 for, 309 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.90 490 voters
10 Feb 2026Proposal to reject the text Application of the ‘safe third country’ conceptRejection220 for, 396 against, 37 abstained Rejected For 34 %r · shared0.90 547 voters
17 Jun 2025Amendment 2 to paragraph 40 Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in SevilleAmendment296 for, 339 against, 31 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.90 550 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197136
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 68 to paragraph 11 — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders”. Vote, 17 September 2026. votingId 197136, reference 2026/2870(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197136 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-17-197136,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 68 to paragraph 11 — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197136}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197136},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 197136, reference 2026/2870(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}