Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 10 — part 1

The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders

Vote
Paragraph 10 — part 1
Decision
No. 9 of the sitting of 17 Sept 2026
Result
390 for · 205 against · 4 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
17 September 2026, 13:45
More facts (6)
Position
vote 54 of 138 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: EPP · split vote: Renew
Official label
B10-0406/2026 – § 10/1
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0411
Dossier
2026/2870(RSP)
Vote id
197132
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 65 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘illegal’ and ‘recalls, in this regard, that national policies such as mass regularisation cannot be adopted without regard for their impact on other Member States, the Schengen Area and the EU as a whole;’”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 35Abst. 0No vote 9 of 44Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 2Against 46Abst. 1No vote 4 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.91
S&DFor 10Against 103Abst. 1No vote 21 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.86
RenewFor 51Against 12Abst. 0No vote 15 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.71
EPPFor 151Against 1Abst. 0No vote 32 of 184Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 72Against 0Abst. 0No vote 12 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 67Against 0Abst. 0No vote 17 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 26Against 0Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 11Against 8Abst. 2No vote 7 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium020
Germany010
Denmark010
Spain040
Finland030
France090
Ireland020
Italy090
Netherlands010
Portugal020
Sweden010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 599 members

No vote recorded, 118

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 118 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
1 Apr 2025Request for urgent procedure Final vote Amending Directives (EU) 2022/2464 and (EU) 2024/1760 as regards the dates from which Member States are to apply certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsProcedural427 for, 221 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 65 %r · shared0.89 550 voters
6 Jul 2026Monday’s agenda — Request by the ECR Group — Italy and Denmark Final vote Monday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group – Italy and DenmarkOther283 for, 142 against, 11 abstained Adopted For 65 %r · shared0.88 375 voters
17 Jun 2026Final vote on the provisional agreement Common system for the return of third-country nationals staying illegally in the Union (Return Regulation)Final418 for, 218 against, 30 abstained Adopted For 63 %r · shared0.88 569 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
11 Sept 2025Final vote — text as a whole Situation in Colombia after the wave of recent terrorist attacksFinal355 for, 173 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.88 456 voters
1 Apr 2025Amendment 7 — part 2 Macro-financial assistance to EgyptAmendment443 for, 226 against, 0 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.87 560 voters
17 Dec 2025Decision to open negotiations with the Council Final vote Establishment of a list of safe countries of origin at Union levelFinal396 for, 202 against, 56 abstained Adopted For 61 %r · shared0.87 546 voters
17 Sept 2026Final vote — text as a whole Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí NavarroFinal374 for, 198 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.86 573 voters
22 Jan 2025Amendments 4 + 7 (voted as one) to paragraph 19 Need for actions to address the continued oppression and fake elections in BelarusAmendment429 for, 205 against, 23 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.85 544 voters
17 Dec 2025Final vote on the provisional agreement Deforestation Regulation: certain obligations of operators and tradersFinal405 for, 242 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 62 %r · shared0.85 548 voters
13 Nov 2025Referral back to committee Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsProcedural426 for, 202 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 67 %r · shared0.85 530 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197132
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 10 — part 1 — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders”. Vote, 17 September 2026. votingId 197132, reference 2026/2870(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197132 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-17-197132,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 10 — part 1 — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197132}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197132},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 197132, reference 2026/2870(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}