Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 6, after paragraph 9

The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders

Vote
Amendment 6, after paragraph 9
Decision
No. 9 of the sitting of 17 Sept 2026
Result
266 for · 295 against · 37 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
17 September 2026, 13:44
More facts (6)
Position
vote 51 of 138 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
B10-0406/2026 – After § 9 – Am 6
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0411
Dossier
2026/2870(RSP)
Vote id
197129
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 44 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 35Abst. 0No vote 9 of 44Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 49Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 1Against 113Abst. 0No vote 21 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 0Against 63Abst. 2No vote 13 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.95
EPPFor 86Against 30Abst. 30No vote 38 of 184Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.38
ECRFor 73Against 0Abst. 0No vote 11 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 68Against 0Abst. 0No vote 16 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 26Against 0Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 12Against 5Abst. 5No vote 6 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ECR members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium100
Bulgaria200
Cyprus100
Czechia200
Denmark100
Estonia100
Spain200
Finland100
France400
Greece200
Croatia100
Italy2100
Lithuania200
Latvia200
Netherlands300
Poland1800
Romania600
Sweden300

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 598 members

No vote recorded, 119

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 119 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
2 Apr 2025Amendment 64, adding text after paragraph 52 Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2024Amendment209 for, 287 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 41 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 427 voters
23 Jan 2025Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1 Situation in Venezuela following the usurpation of the presidency on 10 January 2025Amendment148 for, 285 against, 23 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 390 voters
3 Apr 2025Amendment 3, adding text after recital B Execution spree in Iran and the confirmation of the death sentences of activists Behrouz Ehsani and Mehdi HassaniAmendment272 for, 264 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 48 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 474 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
2 Apr 2025Amendment 146 to paragraph 125 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2024Amendment322 for, 305 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 51 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 525 voters
13 Feb 2025Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 4 Continuing detention and risk of the death penalty for individuals in Nigeria charged with blasphemy, notably the case of Yahaya Sharif-AminuAmendment246 for, 259 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 47 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 443 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 65, adding text after paragraph 22 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment326 for, 315 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 50 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.91 538 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 64 to paragraph 22 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment337 for, 311 against, 11 abstained Adopted For 51 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 542 voters
9 Jul 2026Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 3 The abduction, forced conversion and child marriage of Maria Shahbaz and the protection of girls in PakistanAmendment301 for, 281 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 51 %Requested by Greens, Patriotsr · shared0.91 516 voters
22 May 2025Amendment 42 to paragraph 33 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023Amendment309 for, 263 against, 13 abstained Adopted For 53 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 490 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 56, adding text after paragraph 11 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment321 for, 318 against, 11 abstained Adopted For 49 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.90 534 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197129
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 6, after paragraph 9 — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders”. Vote, 17 September 2026. votingId 197129, reference 2026/2870(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197129 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-17-197129,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 6, after paragraph 9 — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197129}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197129},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 197129, reference 2026/2870(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}