Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 5, after paragraph 7

The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders

Vote
Amendment 5, after paragraph 7
Decision
No. 9 of the sitting of 17 Sept 2026
Result
202 for · 380 against · 18 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
17 September 2026, 13:42
More facts (6)
Position
vote 40 of 138 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
B10-0406/2026 – After § 7 – Am 5
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0411
Dossier
2026/2870(RSP)
Vote id
197117
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 34 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 2Against 32Abst. 1No vote 9 of 44Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.87
GreensFor 0Against 49Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 114Abst. 0No vote 21 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 1Against 57Abst. 7No vote 13 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.82
EPPFor 30Against 121Abst. 1No vote 32 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.69
ECRFor 70Against 0Abst. 3No vote 11 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
PatriotsFor 65Against 0Abst. 4No vote 15 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.91
ESNFor 23Against 1Abst. 0No vote 3 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 11Against 6Abst. 2No vote 9 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium020
Germany010
Denmark001
Spain040
Finland030
France080
Greece010
Ireland020
Italy260
Netherlands010
Portugal020
Sweden020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 600 members

No vote recorded, 117

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 117 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
16 Sept 2026Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 64 Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructureAmendment220 for, 432 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 582 voters
18 Dec 2025Amendment 3 to paragraph 8 Decarbonisation and modernisation of EU fisheries, and the development and deployment of fishing gearAmendment196 for, 367 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.92 497 voters
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 15 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Separate vote210 for, 417 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 33 %r · shared0.92 537 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Sept 2026Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 2 — part 2 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officersAmendment210 for, 396 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by Patriots, EPPr · shared0.92 591 voters
21 Jan 2026Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 10 Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2025Amendment231 for, 410 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 36 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 541 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 2 — part 1 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officersAmendment210 for, 395 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by Patriots, EPPr · shared0.91 590 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 11 to paragraph 9 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAmendment204 for, 423 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 540 voters
9 Oct 2025Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 3 Situation in Afghanistan: supporting women and communities affected by the recent earthquakesAmendment228 for, 367 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 37 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 515 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 55 The European Water Resilience StrategyAmendment211 for, 410 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by Members, Greensr · shared0.90 530 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 48 to paragraph 20, point vii Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAmendment238 for, 409 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 37 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.90 543 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197117
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 5, after paragraph 7 — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders”. Vote, 17 September 2026. votingId 197117, reference 2026/2870(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197117 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-17-197117,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 5, after paragraph 7 — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197117}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197117},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 197117, reference 2026/2870(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}