Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 4, after paragraph 5

The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders

Vote
Amendment 4, after paragraph 5
Decision
No. 9 of the sitting of 17 Sept 2026
Result
280 for · 292 against · 26 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
17 September 2026, 13:40
More facts (6)
Position
vote 27 of 138 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
B10-0406/2026 – After § 5 – Am 4
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0411
Dossier
2026/2870(RSP)
Vote id
197104
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 280 for, 292 against, 26 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 47 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 37Abst. 0No vote 7 of 44Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 48Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 113Abst. 0No vote 22 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 58Abst. 6No vote 14 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.86
EPPFor 101Against 31Abst. 15No vote 37 of 184Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.53
ECRFor 74Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 68Against 0Abst. 0No vote 16 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 25Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 12Against 5Abst. 5No vote 6 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria020
Belgium020
Czechia010
Germany0150
Denmark020
Spain040
Finland010
France040
Croatia010
Italy030
Lithuania010
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Netherlands050
Romania010
Sweden030
Slovenia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 598 members

No vote recorded, 119

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 119 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
2 Apr 2025Amendment 64, adding text after paragraph 52 Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2024Amendment209 for, 287 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 41 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 425 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 64 to paragraph 22 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment337 for, 311 against, 11 abstained Adopted For 51 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 539 voters
3 Apr 2025Amendment 3, adding text after recital B Execution spree in Iran and the confirmation of the death sentences of activists Behrouz Ehsani and Mehdi HassaniAmendment272 for, 264 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 48 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 473 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
2 Apr 2025Amendment 65, adding text after paragraph 22 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment326 for, 315 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 50 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.93 537 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 146 to paragraph 125 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2024Amendment322 for, 305 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 51 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 522 voters
20 Jan 2026Amendment 8 to paragraph 7a Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug traffickingAmendment347 for, 277 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 55 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 526 voters
23 Jan 2025Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1 Situation in Venezuela following the usurpation of the presidency on 10 January 2025Amendment148 for, 285 against, 23 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 388 voters
20 Jan 2026Amendment 12 to paragraph 22 Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug traffickingAmendment349 for, 287 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 54 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 533 voters
13 Feb 2025Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 4 Continuing detention and risk of the death penalty for individuals in Nigeria charged with blasphemy, notably the case of Yahaya Sharif-AminuAmendment246 for, 259 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 47 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 442 voters
20 Jan 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 5 Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug traffickingAmendment350 for, 277 against, 13 abstained Adopted For 55 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 533 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197104
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 4, after paragraph 5 — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders”. Vote, 17 September 2026. votingId 197104, reference 2026/2870(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197104 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-17-197104,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 4, after paragraph 5 — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197104}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197104},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 197104, reference 2026/2870(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}