Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 47, after paragraph 4

The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders

Vote
Amendment 47, after paragraph 4
Decision
No. 9 of the sitting of 17 Sept 2026
Result
437 for · 82 against · 82 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
17 September 2026, 13:39
More facts (6)
Position
vote 24 of 138 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D
Official label
B10-0406/2026 – After § 4 – Am 47
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0411
Dossier
2026/2870(RSP)
Vote id
197102
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 437 for, 82 against, 82 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 73 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 35Against 0Abst. 1No vote 8 of 44Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 9Against 3Abst. 34No vote 7 of 53Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.61
S&DFor 113Against 0Abst. 0No vote 22 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 65Against 0Abst. 0No vote 13 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 127Against 4Abst. 21No vote 32 of 184Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.75
ECRFor 72Against 2Abst. 0No vote 10 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 0Against 63Abst. 6No vote 15 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.87
ESNFor 1Against 6Abst. 17No vote 3 of 27Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.56
No groupFor 15Against 4Abst. 3No vote 6 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria500
Belgium300
Bulgaria500
Cyprus200
Czechia410
Germany2600
Denmark200
Estonia200
Spain0021
Finland200
France400
Greece100
Croatia600
Hungary500
Ireland100
Italy800
Lithuania300
Luxembourg200
Latvia200
Malta200
Netherlands300
Poland2030
Portugal700
Romania500
Sweden300
Slovenia300
Slovakia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 601 members

No vote recorded, 116

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 116 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 Jul 2025Final vote — text as a whole EU-Greenland and Denmark Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement: Implementing Protocol 2025-2030 (Resolution)Final561 for, 109 against, 11 abstained Adopted For 82 %r · shared0.83 563 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 134 to Article 6 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment473 for, 154 against, 22 abstained Adopted For 73 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.79 534 voters
28 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 5 The role of ocean diplomacy for the competitiveness of EU fisheries and aquacultureSeparate vote447 for, 74 against, 16 abstained Adopted For 83 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.76 453 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
28 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole The role of ocean diplomacy for the competitiveness of EU fisheries and aquacultureFinal430 for, 107 against, 115 abstained Adopted For 66 %r · shared0.75 547 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 11, adding text after recital 8 — part 1 Framework for achieving climate neutralityAmendment494 for, 128 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 77 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.75 536 voters
8 Jul 2025Paragraph 49 — part 3 Security of energy supply in the EUSplit vote535 for, 122 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.74 554 voters
7 May 2025Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Council and CouncilFinal526 for, 119 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 79 %r · shared0.73 552 voters
12 Mar 2025Paragraph 17 — part 1 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025Split vote544 for, 109 against, 25 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.73 560 voters
20 Jan 2026Amendment 2, adding text after recital G Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug traffickingAmendment499 for, 112 against, 41 abstained Adopted For 77 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.73 542 voters
19 Dec 2024Paragraph 1, point a — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote464 for, 99 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 81 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.73 480 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197102
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 47, after paragraph 4 — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders”. Vote, 17 September 2026. votingId 197102, reference 2026/2870(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197102 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-17-197102,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 47, after paragraph 4 — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197102}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197102},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 197102, reference 2026/2870(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}