Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 24, after paragraph 4

The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders

Vote
Amendment 24, after paragraph 4
Result
272 for · 256 against · 77 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
17 September 2026, 13:39
More facts (6)
Position
vote 22 of 138 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens
Official label
B10-0406/2026 – After § 4 – Am 24
Vote id
197100
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 272 for, 256 against, 77 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 45 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 37Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 44Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 49Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 113Against 2Abst. 0No vote 20 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
RenewFor 62Against 2Abst. 1No vote 13 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
EPPFor 1Against 146Abst. 3No vote 34 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
ECRFor 0Against 73Abst. 1No vote 10 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 0Against 6Abst. 63No vote 15 of 84Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.87
ESNFor 0Against 20Abst. 5No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.70
No groupFor 10Against 7Abst. 4No vote 7 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria050
Belgium030
Bulgaria050
Cyprus020
Czechia113
Germany0260
Denmark020
Estonia020
Spain0210
Finland020
France040
Greece010
Croatia030
Hungary050
Ireland010
Italy080
Lithuania030
Luxembourg020
Latvia020
Malta020
Netherlands030
Poland0230
Portugal070
Romania060
Sweden030
Slovenia030
Slovakia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 605 members

No vote recorded, 112

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 112 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 Jul 2025Amendment 4 to paragraph 32 EU-Greenland and Denmark Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement: Implementing Protocol 2025-2030 (Resolution)Amendment304 for, 334 against, 38 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.92 562 voters
17 Jun 2025Separate vote on paragraph 1 Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in SevilleSeparate vote304 for, 305 against, 55 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by S&D, Renewr · shared0.91 550 voters
8 Oct 2025Amendment 143 to Article 1 Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chainAmendment282 for, 360 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.91 542 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 112 — part 3 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportSplit vote284 for, 335 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by EPP, S&Dr · shared0.91 533 voters
9 Jul 2025Request for urgent procedure Final vote European Climate LawProcedural300 for, 379 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 44 %r · shared0.91 570 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point aa — part 3 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote251 for, 296 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.90 484 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 6 to recital J The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equalityAmendment292 for, 348 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.90 557 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 60 2023 and 2024 reports on MontenegroAmendment276 for, 307 against, 64 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.90 538 voters
17 Jun 2025Separate vote on paragraph 44 Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in SevilleSeparate vote280 for, 322 against, 62 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by S&D, Renewr · shared0.90 549 voters
8 Jul 2025Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 34 EU-Greenland and Denmark Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement: Implementing Protocol 2025-2030 (Resolution)Amendment294 for, 334 against, 47 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.90 562 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 24, after paragraph 4 — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders”. Vote, 17 September 2026. votingId 197100, reference 2026/2870(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197100 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-17-197100,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 24, after paragraph 4 — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197100}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197100},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 197100, reference 2026/2870(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}