Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 8, after paragraph 4

The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders

Vote
Amendment 8, after paragraph 4
Decision
No. 9 of the sitting of 17 Sept 2026
Result
124 for · 428 against · 50 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
17 September 2026, 13:39
More facts (6)
Position
vote 21 of 138 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN
Official label
B10-0406/2026 – After § 4 – Am 8
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0411
Dossier
2026/2870(RSP)
Vote id
197099
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 124 for, 428 against, 50 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 21 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 35Abst. 1No vote 8 of 44Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 0Against 49Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 114Abst. 0No vote 21 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 1Against 63Abst. 0No vote 14 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 0Against 150Abst. 2No vote 32 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
ECRFor 23Against 4Abst. 45No vote 12 of 84Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.44
PatriotsFor 64Against 4Abst. 1No vote 15 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.89
ESNFor 25Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 11Against 9Abst. 1No vote 7 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium020
Germany010
Denmark001
Spain040
Finland030
France090
Greece010
Ireland020
Italy090
Netherlands010
Portugal010
Sweden020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 602 members

No vote recorded, 115

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 115 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
16 Jun 2026Amendment 1 Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countriesAmendment150 for, 474 against, 47 abstained Rejected For 22 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.94 570 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 29 to paragraph 39 Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience FacilityAmendment150 for, 452 against, 52 abstained Rejected For 23 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 543 voters
25 Nov 2025Amendment 12 to paragraph 7 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedAmendment151 for, 443 against, 49 abstained Rejected For 23 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.92 536 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Jun 2025Amendment 26 to paragraph 34 Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience FacilityAmendment159 for, 445 against, 49 abstained Rejected For 24 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 542 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 19 to paragraph 20 Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience FacilityAmendment152 for, 444 against, 54 abstained Rejected For 23 %Requested by ESN, Patriotsr · shared0.92 540 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 81 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAmendment190 for, 443 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 544 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 4, adding text after recital I EU-Uzbekistan Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (resolution)Amendment122 for, 454 against, 75 abstained Rejected For 19 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.92 554 voters
31 Mar 2025Tuesday's agenda — Request by the PfE Group Final vote Tuesday's agenda – Request by the PfE GroupOther118 for, 326 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 26 %r · shared0.92 385 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 40 Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2024Amendment181 for, 474 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.91 550 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 11 to paragraph 26 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment170 for, 426 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.91 500 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197099
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 8, after paragraph 4 — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders”. Vote, 17 September 2026. votingId 197099, reference 2026/2870(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197099 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-17-197099,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 8, after paragraph 4 — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197099}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197099},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 197099, reference 2026/2870(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}