Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 23 to paragraph 4

The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders

Vote
Amendment 23 to paragraph 4
Decision
No. 9 of the sitting of 17 Sept 2026
Result
427 for · 156 against · 24 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
17 September 2026, 13:38
More facts (6)
Position
vote 17 of 138 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens
Official label
B10-0406/2026 – § 4 – Am 23
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0411
Dossier
2026/2870(RSP)
Vote id
197094
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 427 for, 156 against, 24 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 70 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 37Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 44Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 49Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 114Against 0Abst. 1No vote 20 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 61Against 2Abst. 1No vote 14 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
EPPFor 7Against 147Abst. 0No vote 30 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
ECRFor 70Against 4Abst. 0No vote 10 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.92
PatriotsFor 66Against 1Abst. 0No vote 17 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
ESNFor 6Against 1Abst. 18No vote 2 of 27Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.58
No groupFor 17Against 1Abst. 4No vote 6 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium200
Germany100
Denmark100
Spain400
Finland300
France900
Greece100
Ireland200
Italy900
Netherlands100
Portugal200
Sweden200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 607 members

No vote recorded, 110

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 110 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Separate vote on paragraph 54 Public procurementSeparate vote440 for, 201 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.87 536 voters
17 Jun 2025Separate vote on paragraph 39 Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in SevilleSeparate vote475 for, 181 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by S&D, Renewr · shared0.83 553 voters
9 Feb 2026Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the Renew Group — Ukraine Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the Renew Group – UkraineOther278 for, 121 against, 16 abstained Adopted For 67 %r · shared0.83 361 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
7 May 2025Amendment 7 to paragraph 21 — part 1 2023 and 2024 reports on TürkiyeAmendment393 for, 182 against, 49 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.79 524 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 53 to paragraph 1, after point aa Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAmendment379 for, 181 against, 78 abstained Adopted For 59 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.79 548 voters
23 Jan 2025Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 4 Systematic repression of human rights in Iran, notably the cases of Pakhshan Azizi and Wrisha Moradi, and the taking of EU citizens as hostagesAmendment456 for, 135 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 75 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.76 520 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 35 to paragraph 1, point ae Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAmendment415 for, 206 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.75 551 voters
30 Apr 2026Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 27 — part 1 Estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2027 – Section I – European ParliamentAmendment410 for, 146 against, 28 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.75 506 voters
9 Jul 2026Amendment 6 to paragraph 7 Joint communication on humanitarian aidAmendment283 for, 216 against, 83 abstained Adopted For 49 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.75 507 voters
9 Sept 2025Separate vote on recital AA Public procurementSeparate vote415 for, 215 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.74 530 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197094
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 23 to paragraph 4 — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders”. Vote, 17 September 2026. votingId 197094, reference 2026/2870(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197094 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-17-197094,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 23 to paragraph 4 — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197094}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197094},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 197094, reference 2026/2870(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}