Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 7, after paragraph 3

The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders

Vote
Amendment 7, after paragraph 3
Decision
No. 9 of the sitting of 17 Sept 2026
Result
136 for · 423 against · 46 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
17 September 2026, 13:37
More facts (6)
Position
vote 13 of 138 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN
Official label
B10-0406/2026 – After § 3 – Am 7
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0411
Dossier
2026/2870(RSP)
Vote id
197091
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 136 for, 423 against, 46 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 22 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 2Against 34Abst. 0No vote 8 of 44Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.92
GreensFor 0Against 48Abst. 1No vote 4 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 0Against 114Abst. 0No vote 21 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 63Abst. 2No vote 13 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.95
EPPFor 1Against 153Abst. 0No vote 30 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 29Against 2Abst. 42No vote 11 of 84Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.36
PatriotsFor 65Against 3Abst. 1No vote 15 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.91
ESNFor 25Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 14Against 6Abst. 0No vote 8 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria600
Belgium300
Czechia131
Denmark100
Spain600
France2600
Greece100
Hungary700
Italy500
Latvia100
Netherlands500
Poland200
Portugal100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 605 members

No vote recorded, 112

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 112 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 11 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAmendment175 for, 446 against, 29 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 547 voters
27 Apr 2026Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the ESN Group — Limiting EU legislation Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ESN Group – Limiting EU legislationOther127 for, 338 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 27 %r · shared0.94 403 voters
16 Jun 2026Amendment 1 Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countriesAmendment150 for, 474 against, 47 abstained Rejected For 22 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.94 572 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
25 Nov 2025Amendment 6, adding text after recital H Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedAmendment182 for, 447 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.93 539 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 29 to paragraph 39 Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience FacilityAmendment150 for, 452 against, 52 abstained Rejected For 23 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 547 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 41, adding text after paragraph 48 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAmendment170 for, 462 against, 35 abstained Rejected For 25 %r · shared0.93 580 voters
25 Nov 2025Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 2 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedAmendment182 for, 446 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.93 541 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 3 to paragraph 77 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment196 for, 422 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.93 528 voters
25 Nov 2025Amendment 12 to paragraph 7 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedAmendment151 for, 443 against, 49 abstained Rejected For 23 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.93 540 voters
16 Jun 2026Amendment 2 to recital A European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment191 for, 467 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.93 571 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197091
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 7, after paragraph 3 — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders”. Vote, 17 September 2026. votingId 197091, reference 2026/2870(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197091 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-17-197091,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 7, after paragraph 3 — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197091}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197091},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 197091, reference 2026/2870(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}