Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 18, after paragraph 1

The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders

Vote
Amendment 18, after paragraph 1
Result
111 for · 439 against · 51 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
17 September 2026, 13:35
More facts (6)
Position
vote 3 of 138 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens
Official label
B10-0406/2026 – After § 1 – Am 18
Vote id
197081
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 111 for, 439 against, 51 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 18 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 35Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 44Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 49Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 2Against 108Abst. 1No vote 24 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
RenewFor 18Against 43Abst. 0No vote 17 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.56
EPPFor 3Against 151Abst. 1No vote 29 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
ECRFor 1Against 31Abst. 42No vote 10 of 84Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.35
PatriotsFor 0Against 69Abst. 0No vote 15 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 25Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 3Against 12Abst. 7No vote 6 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria060
Belgium030
Czechia050
Denmark010
Spain060
France0260
Greece010
Hungary070
Italy050
Latvia010
Netherlands050
Poland020
Portugal010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 601 members

No vote recorded, 116

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 116 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
31 Mar 2025Tuesday's agenda — Request by the Verts/ALE Group Final vote Tuesday's agenda – Request by the Verts/ALE GroupOther82 for, 357 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 18 %r · shared0.81 384 voters
12 Mar 2026Amendment 4 to Annex, point a Calculation of emission credits for heavy-duty vehicles for the reporting periods of the years 2025 to 2029Amendment81 for, 468 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.81 477 voters
12 Mar 2026Amendment 5 to Annex, point b Calculation of emission credits for heavy-duty vehicles for the reporting periods of the years 2025 to 2029Amendment81 for, 466 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.80 476 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Mar 2026Amendment 17 to paragraph 16 Activities of the European Ombudsman – annual report 2024Amendment98 for, 453 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.80 479 voters
12 Mar 2026Proposal to reject the text Calculation of emission credits for heavy-duty vehicles for the reporting periods of the years 2025 to 2029Rejection81 for, 473 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 14 %r · shared0.79 480 voters
18 Dec 2024Amendment 3 to paragraph 1, after point d Setting up a Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield, and defining its responsibilities, numerical strength and term of officeAmendment106 for, 530 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.79 537 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 35, adding text after paragraph 50 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment94 for, 559 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 14 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.79 556 voters
18 Dec 2024Amendment 1 to recital A Setting up a Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield, and defining its responsibilities, numerical strength and term of officeAmendment106 for, 533 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.79 537 voters
18 Dec 2024Amendment 2 to paragraph 1, after point d Setting up a Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield, and defining its responsibilities, numerical strength and term of officeAmendment101 for, 533 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.78 534 voters
12 Mar 2026Amendment 3 to Article 1, after paragraph 1 Calculation of emission credits for heavy-duty vehicles for the reporting periods of the years 2025 to 2029Amendment90 for, 462 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.78 477 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 18, after paragraph 1 — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders”. Vote, 17 September 2026. votingId 197081, reference 2026/2870(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197081 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-17-197081,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 18, after paragraph 1 — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197081}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197081},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 197081, reference 2026/2870(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}