Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 1 — part 2

The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders

Vote
Paragraph 1 — part 2
Result
435 for · 127 against · 47 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
17 September 2026, 13:35
More facts (6)
Position
vote 2 of 138 on the decision
Requested by
split vote: Patriots
Official label
B10-0406/2026 – § 1/2
Vote id
197080
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 435 for, 127 against, 47 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 71 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “who have long embodied a living example of coexistence between people of different cultures, origins and religions; stresses that this coexistence is not merely a social reality but a daily affirmation of the rule of law, equal rights and the common values that lie at the heart of the European project;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 35Against 1Abst. 0No vote 8 of 44Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 49Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 114Against 0Abst. 0No vote 21 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 66Against 0Abst. 0No vote 12 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 155Against 0Abst. 0No vote 29 of 184Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 7Against 27Abst. 40No vote 10 of 84Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.31
PatriotsFor 1Against 63Abst. 4No vote 16 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.89
ESNFor 0Against 25Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 8Against 11Abst. 3No vote 6 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria500
Belgium300
Bulgaria500
Cyprus200
Czechia500
Germany2700
Denmark200
Estonia200
Spain2100
Finland200
France400
Greece100
Croatia600
Hungary500
Ireland100
Italy800
Lithuania300
Luxembourg200
Latvia200
Malta200
Netherlands300
Poland2300
Portugal700
Romania600
Sweden300
Slovenia400
Slovakia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 609 members

No vote recorded, 108

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 108 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 101 — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote449 for, 141 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.94 546 voters
22 Jan 2026Paragraph 10 — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote427 for, 161 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.93 526 voters
22 Jan 2026Paragraph 11 — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote430 for, 157 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.92 522 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
7 Jul 2026Separate vote on paragraph 14 A new strategy for media literacy and digital learningSeparate vote455 for, 151 against, 41 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.92 554 voters
7 Jul 2026Final vote — text as a whole A new strategy for media literacy and digital learningFinal447 for, 128 against, 78 abstained Adopted For 68 %r · shared0.92 557 voters
21 Oct 2025Final vote on the provisional agreement Re-attribution of scientific and technical tasks and improving cooperation among Union agencies in the area of chemicalsFinal469 for, 126 against, 50 abstained Adopted For 73 %r · shared0.91 540 voters
22 Jan 2026Recital P — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote419 for, 158 against, 25 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.91 518 voters
21 Oct 2025Final vote on the provisional agreement Statute and funding of European political parties and European political foundationsFinal446 for, 162 against, 35 abstained Adopted For 69 %r · shared0.91 538 voters
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European ParliamentFinal441 for, 131 against, 81 abstained Adopted For 68 %r · shared0.91 552 voters
22 Jan 2026Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 3 European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructureAmendment426 for, 180 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriots, Renewr · shared0.91 539 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 1 — part 2 — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders”. Vote, 17 September 2026. votingId 197080, reference 2026/2870(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197080 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-17-197080,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 1 — part 2 — The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197080}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/197080},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 197080, reference 2026/2870(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}