Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 4, after paragraph 48

Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy

Vote
Amendment 4, after paragraph 48
Decision
No. 5 of the sitting of 12 Feb 2026
Result
421 for · 74 against · 83 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
12 February 2026, 12:22
More facts (6)
Position
vote 14 of 27 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Members
Official label
A10-0260/2025 – João Oliveira – After § 48 – Am 4
Text
Report A-10-2025-0260
Dossier
2025/2095(INI)
Vote id
184773
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 421 for, 74 against, 83 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 73 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 39Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 41Against 1Abst. 0No vote 11 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
S&DFor 107Against 1Abst. 0No vote 28 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 55Against 4Abst. 4No vote 12 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.81
EPPFor 139Against 5Abst. 1No vote 42 of 187Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
ECRFor 18Against 11Abst. 33No vote 17 of 79Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.30
PatriotsFor 6Against 46Abst. 17No vote 15 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.50
ESNFor 1Against 3Abst. 21No vote 2 of 27Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.76
No groupFor 15Against 3Abst. 7No vote 7 of 32Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria050
Belgium020
Czechia601
Denmark010
Spain060
France0220
Hungary009
Italy007
Latvia010
Netherlands060
Poland020
Portugal010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 578 members

No vote recorded, 141

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 141 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Dec 2025Paragraph 7 — part 2 Digitalisation, artificial intelligence and algorithmic management in the workplace – shaping the future of workSplit vote469 for, 136 against, 52 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.85 542 voters
17 Dec 2025Paragraph 16 — part 2 Digitalisation, artificial intelligence and algorithmic management in the workplace – shaping the future of workSplit vote471 for, 137 against, 49 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.83 542 voters
9 Oct 2025Paragraph 1 — part 1 Second World Summit for Social DevelopmentSplit vote442 for, 134 against, 38 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.82 505 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
23 Oct 2024Final vote Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member StatesFinal444 for, 179 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 69 %r · shared0.79 512 voters
1 Apr 2025Final vote Re-attribution of scientific and technical tasks to the European Chemicals AgencyFinal482 for, 110 against, 81 abstained Adopted For 72 %r · shared0.79 542 voters
7 May 2025Paragraph 31 — part 2 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Court of AuditorsSplit vote488 for, 109 against, 68 abstained Adopted For 73 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.79 535 voters
11 Mar 2025Final vote — text as a whole European Social Fund Plus post-2027Final432 for, 155 against, 82 abstained Adopted For 65 %r · shared0.79 540 voters
12 Mar 2025Paragraph 17 — part 1 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025Split vote544 for, 109 against, 25 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.78 538 voters
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on citation 27 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Separate vote458 for, 144 against, 39 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.78 523 voters
11 Mar 2026Final vote on the draft Council decision Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of LawFinal455 for, 101 against, 74 abstained Adopted For 72 %r · shared0.78 523 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184773
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 4, after paragraph 48 — Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy”. Vote, 12 February 2026. votingId 184773, reference 2025/2095(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184773 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-02-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-02-12-184773,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 4, after paragraph 48 — Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-02-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184773}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184773},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 184773, reference 2025/2095(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}