Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 1 — part 1

Second World Summit for Social Development

Vote
Paragraph 1 — part 1
Decision
No. 10 of the sitting of 9 Oct 2025
Result
442 for · 134 against · 38 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
9 October 2025, 13:29
More facts (6)
Position
vote 2 of 25 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: EPP · split vote: EPP, ECR
Official label
B10-0408/2025 – § 1/1
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0408
Dossier
2025/2654(RSP)
Vote id
179588
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 442 for, 134 against, 38 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 72 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘as well as put forward legislative initiatives’”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 39Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 45Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 99Against 0Abst. 0No vote 37 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 51Against 10Abst. 0No vote 14 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.75
EPPFor 161Against 10Abst. 0No vote 17 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.91
ECRFor 32Against 15Abst. 22No vote 10 of 79Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.20
PatriotsFor 0Against 66Abst. 12No vote 7 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.77
ESNFor 0Against 24Abst. 1No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 15Against 9Abst. 3No vote 3 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium200
Cyprus100
Germany300
Denmark100
Spain200
Finland300
France800
Greece400
Ireland300
Italy900
Portugal100
Sweden200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 614 members

No vote recorded, 105

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 105 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Dec 2025Paragraph 7 — part 2 Digitalisation, artificial intelligence and algorithmic management in the workplace – shaping the future of workSplit vote469 for, 136 against, 52 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.84 566 voters
11 Mar 2025Final vote — text as a whole European Social Fund Plus post-2027Final432 for, 155 against, 82 abstained Adopted For 65 %r · shared0.83 572 voters
17 Dec 2025Paragraph 16 — part 2 Digitalisation, artificial intelligence and algorithmic management in the workplace – shaping the future of workSplit vote471 for, 137 against, 49 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.83 565 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Paragraph 3 — part 2 Public procurementSplit vote497 for, 126 against, 23 abstained Adopted For 77 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.82 569 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 19 — part 1 Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rightsSplit vote447 for, 102 against, 30 abstained Adopted For 77 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.82 504 voters
15 Sept 2026Paragraph 83 — part 1 Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth GuaranteeSplit vote518 for, 74 against, 73 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.82 569 voters
8 Jul 2025Paragraph 49 — part 3 Security of energy supply in the EUSplit vote535 for, 122 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.82 577 voters
12 Feb 2026Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 48 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategyAmendment421 for, 74 against, 83 abstained Adopted For 73 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.82 505 voters
12 Mar 2025Paragraph 17 — part 1 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025Split vote544 for, 109 against, 25 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.81 581 voters
1 Apr 2025Final vote Re-attribution of scientific and technical tasks to the European Chemicals AgencyFinal482 for, 110 against, 81 abstained Adopted For 72 %r · shared0.81 580 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-09/179588
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 1 — part 1 — Second World Summit for Social Development”. Vote, 9 October 2025. votingId 179588, reference 2025/2654(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-09/179588 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 9 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-09-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 9 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-09-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-09, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-10-09/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-10-09-179588,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 1 — part 1 — Second World Summit for Social Development}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-10-09},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-09/179588}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-09/179588},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 179588, reference 2025/2654(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-09-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-09-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-09 (CC BY 4.0)}
}