Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 6, after recital E

Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market

Vote
Amendment 6, after recital E
Decision
No. 13 of the sitting of 8 May 2025
Result
172 for · 288 against · 11 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
8 May 2025, 13:57
More facts (6)
Position
vote 38 of 40 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
B10-0246/2025 - Après le considérant E - Am 6
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0246
Dossier
2025/2542(RSP)
Vote id
176280
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 172 for, 288 against, 11 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 37 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 26Against 0Abst. 0No vote 20 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 43Against 1Abst. 0No vote 9 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 82Against 1Abst. 0No vote 53 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
RenewFor 4Against 51Abst. 0No vote 20 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.89
EPPFor 3Against 103Abst. 0No vote 82 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
ECRFor 2Against 57Abst. 0No vote 21 of 80Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.95
PatriotsFor 0Against 51Abst. 11No vote 23 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.73
ESNFor 0Against 21Abst. 0No vote 6 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 12Against 3Abst. 0No vote 14 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria010
Belgium020
Bulgaria030
Germany080
Estonia020
Spain010
Finland030
France0100
Ireland420
Lithuania010
Luxembourg010
Netherlands060
Poland010
Portugal020
Romania020
Sweden030
Slovenia010
Slovakia020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 471 members

No vote recorded, 248

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 248 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 11 Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rightsAmendment210 for, 349 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 36 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.93 388 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment219 for, 423 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.93 425 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment217 for, 419 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.93 426 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 Jul 2025Amendment 5 to paragraph 34 EU-Greenland and Denmark Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement: Implementing Protocol 2025-2030 (Resolution)Amendment237 for, 436 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.93 449 voters
27 Nov 2025Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 9 Escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in SudanAmendment206 for, 365 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 35 %r · shared0.93 397 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 5 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment201 for, 390 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.93 405 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 65 — part 1 of 2 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2024Split vote237 for, 416 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 36 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.93 442 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 17 to paragraph 64 Public procurementAmendment224 for, 420 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.92 427 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment226 for, 414 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.92 424 voters
27 Nov 2025Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 9 Escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in SudanAmendment206 for, 353 against, 30 abstained Rejected For 35 %r · shared0.92 398 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/176280
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 6, after recital E — Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market”. Vote, 8 May 2025. votingId 176280, reference 2025/2542(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/176280 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 8 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 8 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-08, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-05-08/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-05-08-176280,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 6, after recital E — Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-05-08},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/176280}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/176280},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 176280, reference 2025/2542(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-08 (CC BY 4.0)}
}