Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 24 to paragraph 35

Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market

Vote
Amendment 24 to paragraph 35
Decision
No. 13 of the sitting of 8 May 2025
Result
164 for · 276 against · 22 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
8 May 2025, 13:56
More facts (6)
Position
vote 29 of 40 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR
Official label
B10-0246/2025 - § 35 - Am 24
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0246
Dossier
2025/2542(RSP)
Vote id
176278
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 164 for, 276 against, 22 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 35 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 8Against 14Abst. 1No vote 23 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.41
GreensFor 0Against 43Abst. 0No vote 10 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 2Against 81Abst. 0No vote 53 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
RenewFor 1Against 52Abst. 1No vote 21 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
EPPFor 26Against 76Abst. 1No vote 85 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.61
ECRFor 53Against 6Abst. 1No vote 20 of 80Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.82
PatriotsFor 61Against 0Abst. 0No vote 24 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 3Against 2Abst. 16No vote 6 of 27Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.64
No groupFor 10Against 2Abst. 2No vote 15 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria003
Czechia100
Germany0113
France100
Poland100
Slovakia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 462 members

No vote recorded, 257

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 257 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Sept 2025Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 8 Future of agriculture and the post-2027 common agricultural policyAmendment219 for, 420 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 34 %r · shared0.88 426 voters
10 Sept 2025Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 27 Future of agriculture and the post-2027 common agricultural policyAmendment213 for, 366 against, 57 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.87 417 voters
12 Feb 2025Amendment 4, adding text after recital J Genetically modified maize MON 95275Amendment209 for, 407 against, 32 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.87 427 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Jun 2026Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 4 — part 1 Deteriorating situation of political prisoners in Belarus, in particular the case of Aliaksandra PulinovichAmendment177 for, 369 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.86 374 voters
10 Sept 2025Amendment 6 to paragraph 5 Future of agriculture and the post-2027 common agricultural policyAmendment231 for, 404 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 35 %r · shared0.86 426 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 21, adding text after paragraph 61 2025 Commission report on UkraineAmendment191 for, 414 against, 47 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESN, ECR, EPPr · shared0.86 417 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 22, adding text after paragraph 61 2025 Commission report on UkraineAmendment181 for, 411 against, 51 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by ESN, ECR, EPPr · shared0.86 409 voters
12 Feb 2025Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 5 Genetically modified maize MON 95275Amendment209 for, 408 against, 33 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.86 428 voters
14 Nov 2024Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 48 UN Climate Change Conference 2024 in Baku, Azerbaijan (COP29)Amendment206 for, 412 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.86 419 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 66 to Article 1 Framework for achieving climate neutralityAmendment239 for, 388 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 37 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.86 414 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/176278
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 24 to paragraph 35 — Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market”. Vote, 8 May 2025. votingId 176278, reference 2025/2542(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/176278 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 8 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 8 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-08, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-05-08/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-05-08-176278,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 24 to paragraph 35 — Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-05-08},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/176278}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/176278},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 176278, reference 2025/2542(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-08 (CC BY 4.0)}
}