Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 30 — part 1

Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market

Vote
Paragraph 30 — part 1
Decision
No. 13 of the sitting of 8 May 2025
Result
444 for · 32 against · 3 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
8 May 2025, 13:55
More facts (6)
Position
vote 24 of 40 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens · split vote: Greens
Official label
B10-0246/2025 - § 30/1
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0246
Dossier
2025/2542(RSP)
Vote id
176273
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 444 for, 32 against, 3 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 93 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Highlights the need to further combat misleading advertising and greenwashing and to strengthen the second-hand market;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 28Against 0Abst. 0No vote 18 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 43Against 0Abst. 1No vote 9 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 81Against 0Abst. 0No vote 55 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 53Against 3Abst. 0No vote 19 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.92
EPPFor 110Against 1Abst. 0No vote 77 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 60Against 0Abst. 0No vote 20 of 80Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 54Against 9Abst. 0No vote 22 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.79
ESNFor 1Against 18Abst. 2No vote 6 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.79
No groupFor 14Against 1Abst. 0No vote 14 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria100
Belgium200
Bulgaria300
Germany530
Denmark100
Estonia200
Spain100
Finland300
France1000
Ireland600
Lithuania100
Luxembourg100
Netherlands600
Poland100
Portugal200
Romania200
Sweden300
Slovenia100
Slovakia200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 479 members

No vote recorded, 240

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 240 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

The minority on this vote was under 10 % of the votes cast — too small to compare how it split the chamber.

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/176273
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 30 — part 1 — Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market”. Vote, 8 May 2025. votingId 176273, reference 2025/2542(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/176273 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 8 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 8 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-08, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-05-08/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-05-08-176273,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 30 — part 1 — Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-05-08},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/176273}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/176273},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 176273, reference 2025/2542(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-08 (CC BY 4.0)}
}